“Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyons France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tour. Had the Arabs won the battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. The Germanic peoples would have become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan empire.
Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking: ‘You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?’ It is remarkable that even before the war he sometimes went on: “Today the Siberians, the White Russians, and the people of the steppes live extremely healthy lives. For this reason they are better equipped for development and in the long run biologically superior to the Germans.’ This was an idea he was destined to repeat in far more drastic tones during the last months of the war.” [ Source: Albert Speer: Inside the Third Reich
]Mark Alexander
7 comments:
This post teaches us two things,
1) Hitler and the Nazis were willing to ally themselves, for the sake of expediency, with people whom they considered to be racially inferior. Let this be a lesson to those who would ally themselves with parties like the Vlaams Belang, BNP, and, perhaps, the SD.
2) Hitler regarded Islam itself very highly, because it was a warlike creed. Note also, Hitler was as clear as Robert Spencer that, indeed, Islam is the opposite of Christianity.
Ignorant cunt!
What can I say? I think, by the way, that calling people names will get us nowhere.
You are a Nazi bfb, you're a "nationalist", a racist and have Marxist leanings. That's pretty clear from your sites listed on your profile.
By the gods man! you link to the National Front on your My link page. Even the BNP distances themselves from those bastards. You have a whole site dedicated to being shocked that Black men and White women are depicted together. Why you're upset to be called a Nazi is beyond me because your sites are no different than David Duke's or Stormfront.
And the single word insult in the comments just proves you're as intemperate as a Nazi.
I placed this blog up because I thought it was interesting. I didn't mean to start an argument.
Hell,
I called Pastorius an 'ignorant cunt' because that's what he is. I can see he's not alone.
For your information I despise Marxists and Nazi's in equal measure, which is why I don't link to IBA (or Stormfront for that matter).
Now that one's views have been aired, can we get back to the topic: Hitler's views on Islam.
Post a Comment