Monday, April 06, 2009

Obama's Multiculturalism Endangers the West

President Obama’s being a multiculturalist endangers the West. In a speech in Turkey he announced, “The United States is not and will never be at war with Islam.” He also called for Turkey to become a part of the EU. Both of these statements reflect a very poor understanding of history and cultural diversity. It is dangerous for our president to be multiculturalist instead of culturist.

His call to have Turkey join the EU shows that he does not respect the sovereignty of the Western world. His ability to do so stems from multiculturalists’ failure to recognize diversity. He announced his desire to join Islam in “rolling back the violent ideologies that people of all faiths reject.” This statement indicates that all cultures are the same and hold the same basic values. None are different. Diversity does not exist. This multiculturalism needs to be challenged by culturism if the West is to survive.

Culturists know that diversity exists. Anyone with any familiarity with history knows that not all peoples are polite humanists. Obama carefully said we will never be at war with Islam and left out declaring that we have never been at war with Islam. Islam has been at war with Christendom in the name of cultural supremacy for most of the last 1300 years. Secular multicultural Europe has trouble understanding that Muslims really believe in Islam and its supremacy. Turkish entry into the EU would invite massive immigration of a non-western, different and hostile culture. Because diversity exists, we must be culturist.

Names are important. In Obama’s speech he spoke of the “Muslim community” and the “Muslim world.” Neither of these phrases implies borders. It signifies their cross-border unity. But, there is a non-Muslim world as well. We often speak of this space as Europe and call it multicultural. This indicates that it is just a geographic location with no particular tradition. We need a phrase that implies cultural content in the way that Christendom did for centuries. In a post-Enlightenment world, that phrase is “the West.” Using it implies Jerusalem and Athens, shows our cross-border unity, combats multiculturalism, and lets the world know that a non-Muslim world and community also exists.

Obama said, “We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world.” But, again, as a multiculturalist he must flatten and lie about history. He cannot acknowledge that Islam has stood for a theocratic mode of governance as it still does. He thereby fails to acknowledge the struggle against theocracy and freedom of thought as a major theme of the West since Greece took on Persia. Since the Islamic world is not multiculturalist, this philosophy does not impact them. But it undermines our sense of self as it blinds us to diversity. Our sense of culturism must be dedicated to preserving “the West.”

If Obama is strategically flattening history in order to create global stability and cooperation, I am afraid his plan is doomed to failure. It is doomed because the Islamic world has not forgotten history and denied diversity in the name of multiculturalism. They are culturist. The current existence of theocracies should key us into the fact that secular humanism has not swept the planet and ended history. Diversity still exists. Obama says he wants to “strengthen opportunity for all people.” He is not President of all people. He is the President of a Western nation with a specific history, culture and agenda for which to fight. His not being clear on the fact that diversity exists is dangerous. We need our president to be a western culturist, not a multiculturalist.

www.culturism.us

6 comments:

Damien said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Damien said...

Culturist John,

I know you don't agree with my view that the Jihadists are barbarians, but we both agree that they're dangerous. It looks like the Turkish authorities foiled an attempt by someone who might be one of them, to murder our president according to this AOL_News_article , right before he made his speech.

Andre79 said...

Not only he hasn't a clue about protocol but history as well. And he doesn't even speak Austrian.

Unknown said...

Damien,

Just a slight subtlety, culturism does acknowledge they are barbarians or wrong or what have you, when they practice what they do in our nations. We also do not have to trade with nations whose values we disagree with. But, yes, recognizing and accepting that different values exist internationally is a culturist belief. And, not assuming we're the progressive future all strive for is a practical stance.

I just hope no Americans assassinates the Prez. That would destabilize us terribly.

ANDRE 79, Sorry, I don't know what you mean by his not speaking Austrian!

Thanks! John

Anonymous said...

Culturist John -

In several comments you have expressed anxiety about an attempt on the President's life. I am curious - since what is being said about Obama is, frankly, no "worse" than what was said about GWB, were you worried about an attempt on G. Bush's life as well?

Or is it that you believe an attempt on the current President would be more destabilizing than an attempt on GWB because the current President is essentially an object of worship for a significant portion of the population?

Thx,

Ro

Andre79 said...

@John-lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAmaGgBrDAs

Australians speak Australian, Canadians speak Canadian, USA speaks American and Austrians speak Austrian. Not there's something wrong with that.