Raymond Ibrahim at PJM spells out what is obvious to most of us here. That Nidal Hasan was not a typical nut with a gun, but rather a muslim nut following the rules of Islam.
A Study in Muslim Doctrine (Part 1)
An in-depth look at the Islamic teachings behind the Fort Hood massacre. First up: Hasan's loyalty to Muslims and deception of infidels.
One of the difficulties in discussing Islam’s more troubling doctrines is that they have an anachronistic, even otherworldly, feel to them; that is, unless actively and openly upheld by Muslims, non-Muslims, particularly of the Western variety, tend to see them as abstract theory, not standard practice for today. In fact, some Westerners have difficulties acknowledging even those problematic doctrines that are openly upheld by Muslims — such as jihad. How much more when the doctrines in question are subtle, or stealthy, in nature?
Enter Nidal Malik Hasan, the psychiatrist, U.S. Army major, and “observant Muslim who prayed daily,” who recently went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, killing thirteen Americans (including a pregnant woman). While the media wonders in exasperation why he did it, offering the same old tired and trite reasons — he was “picked on,” he was “mentally unbalanced” — the fact is his behavior comports well with certain Islamic doctrines. As such, it behooves Americans to take a moment and familiarize themselves with the esotericisms of Islam.
Go read it all here.
1 comment:
LOL . . .the facts of Hasan's case must getting under the skin of ol' Ibi Hooper from CAIR.
The following Fox4kc.com blog post was scrubbed before I could capture it. Must have been quite an irritation . . .got this in my google alert - too bad it's gone:
CAIR and North American Muslims; The Truth
fox4kc.com - Kansas City,USA
A panting Ibrahim Hooper said: "Why can't the killer at Fort Hood just be a crazy guy?" "Fighting for freedom, fighting for Islam, that is not suicide…they ...
Post a Comment