You may think this idea is crazy, but the fact is, it's completely logical if you buy the eco-leftie/Anthropogenic Global Warming paradigm.
And, if you do believe in AGW, it is incumbent upon you to kill your dog immediately.
From the Telegraph:
Owners should consider doing without, downsizing or even eating their pets to help save the planet, according to a new book.
It claims that the carbon footprint left by domesticated animals is out of proportion to the size of their paws.
A medium-sized dog has the same impact as a Toyota Land Cruiser driven 6,000 miles a year, while a cat is equivalent to a Volkswagen Golf.
But rabbits and chickens are eco-friendly because they provide meat for their owners while a canary or a goldfish has little effect on the environment.
At the same time a pair of hamsters do the same damage as running a plasma television, suggests the book Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living.
Stop the snickering and start the slaughtering.
Once again, if you buy the eco-leftie/Anthropogenic Global Warming paradigm, and you don't kill and eat your dog, you are destroying the Earth and you are a hypocrite.
1 comment:
I have heard that shooting your own dog was part of the training for the SS in the Third Reich.
And for anyone who hasn't read "One Second Later", do. You will find a poignant refererence to this. During real conditions of war, not eco-mental hysteria.
Ought to make the Muslims happy. On the other hand, I wonder what the equivalent of a camel is in automotive terms.
Post a Comment