The F.B.I. and the Garland Terror Attack: Troubling Questions Which Merit Rigorous Review
From The Last English Prince:
The Last English Prince was there along with CNN, Fox News, Daily Beast and many other representatives of the press corps.
Author K.M. Lessing was there
Amil Imani was in attendance
Jews and Gentiles mingled.
And let’s not forget about the young red-headed little girl who was also inside the Curtis Culwell Center the night of the attack.
What we did not know was that an F.B.I. agent was also present. He was present in the vehicle immediately behind the terrorists when they came out of their car with guns blazing.
This was the same agent who incited Mr. Simpson to “Tear up Texas”. The same agent who took a grainy image of a Garland Police Officer and Security Guard who faced down the gunfire when the doors of the vehicle opened and the terrorists brought their gun powder to life.
I note incitement and not entrapment in his actions. Entrapment would have provided the men with disabled weapons and non-lethal ammunition. These men came to kill. And they had the weapons to do it.
Did the F.B.I. want a “let it play” scenario?
Let it play… see how the dumb Garland police and Irving SWAT members perform with an authentic live fire attack?
As the bodies are receiving an autopsy, the F.B.I. is debriefing with their own forensic autopsy?
Would an allowable body count have included this headline?
“Three Police Officers, Five Adults and One Young Girl Killed in Garland, Texas Terror Attack.”
Could my image in this video have been the last glimpse of me in living state?
Of course, after the headline about the massacre, the citizens of America would have been relieved to read this: “The F.B.I. is on the scene….”
They were already on the scene. Like flies on a steaming pile of caca.
But what about the young red-headed girl? Was she also expendable?