'cookieChoices = {};'


"Anyone can act presidential. "
It's a lot harder to do what I do.
Trump

click.jpg

Friday, June 08, 2018

The FBI is Ordering Witnesses Not to Bring Documentary Evidence About the Awan Clan IT Swindle, So It Can Claim There's Nothing There to Investigate


From Ace of Spades:
He says that witnesses in this case have documentary evidence of Awan's fraud -- the false prices he'd claim to keep the stuff he was buying off the inventory lists -- but the FBI keeps telling witnesses not to bring that evidence, and that they just want to talk. 
So far, Awan has only been charged with a misstatement on a loan application -- and if Gohmert's charge is accurate, the FBI is deliberately avoiding seeing any evidence that would force them to charge him with more than that, and do additional investigation. 
.@replouiegohmert just said on the House floor that the FBI is ordering witnesses NOT to give it evidence in the Awan case, so it can say that there's no evidence anything occurred. Must-watch speech https://t.co/rWe93uJfNq — Luke Rosiak (@lukerosiak) 6. lipnja 2018. 
Here's a direct clip of the speech: https://t.co/qDltsXV5Ki 
'We need someone assigned to the Awan case that will protect Congress from further breaches and from the Awan crime family... for heavens sake, we need someone in the FBI to step up and do their job' — Luke Rosiak (@lukerosiak) 6. lipnja 2018. 
And from Ed Driscoll at Instapundit: 
SOURCES: DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ SCREAMED AT HOUSE OFFICIALS TO KILL HACKING PROBE, INTERVENED IN PAKISTANI CRIMINAL MATTER. 
That cites, of course, Luke Rosniak, one of the only reporters covering this story (as opposed to covering it with a fire-retardant blanket). 
Ex-Democratic National Committee head Debbie Wasserman Schultz said she intervened in a Pakistani land deal involving her then–IT aide Imran Awan, according to two House employees. 
The dispute came after Awan's father was charged with fraud in relation to the deal, and the mysterious exertion of political influence resulted in Pakistani authorities instead targeting the elderly alleged victims, according to a local report. 
And when a House Office of Inspector General cybersecurity investigation found that Awan made "unauthorized access" to House servers, including the House Democratic Caucus’ shortly before the election, Wasserman Schultz became "frantic, not normal," "making the rounds" to House officials in an attempt to kill the investigation, one House employee told The Daily Caller News Foundation. 
Awan told people Wasserman Schultz chose the name for his daughter, Leza -- a Jewish name -- and that the Florida congresswoman's daughter regularly rode a horse that Awan kept at a boarding facility, sources with knowledge of the relationship told TheDCNF. 
Wasserman Schultz cornered House Chief Administrative Officer Phil Kiko and called him a "fucking Islamophobe," saying "you will not so much as take away their parking spots," the two House employees said Kiko told them. 
The congresswoman also told Kiko she had invited Awan's whole family to her daughter's bat mitzvah and said she had "helped him with a land deal," the sources said. A spokesman for Kiko declined to comment on this story.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link#

3 Comments:

Anonymous thelastesnglishprince said...

Here is my principle:

"Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful."

If you walk "with", you might then stand "with", and culminate in sitting "with".

Within Islam, I have always "walked with" but I have never stood, nor been seated with in a manner which smacks of collusion or criminality. That oath is still on my lips.

Wasserman Schultz did not heed the warning. She is at fault, if nothing else, for severe lapses in judgment.

Friday, June 08, 2018 1:23:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

There is a difference between walking with - as in, next to - the enemies of God, to gain information

vs

"walking in the counsel of the unGodly."

BIG DIFFERENCE.

Friday, June 08, 2018 1:33:00 pm  
Anonymous thelastenglishprince said...

Agreed. And guess who did not sleep her way into the information chain?

With the news breaking about this:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/08/james-wolfe-former-senate-intel-panel-security-director-indicted-for-allegedly-lying-to-fbi.html

No wonder there was an investigation launched. What senior student in a university journalism track is capable of breaking news stories such as the ones put out by this young woman without have a "leg up" (from-and-for) a powerful entity. Nothing quite like young flesh to get a powerful man to spill state secrets. Disgusted.

In all honesty, it took a solid five years of research journalism before I ventured into the field of investigative journalism regarding terrorism activities on U.S. soil. It has been quite the trip. One never regretted.

Friday, June 08, 2018 4:44:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Older Posts Newer Posts