Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Howard Stern Exposes Why So Many People Support Obama



Hat tip to Noel Sheppard at NewsBusters:
Although I imagine most conservatives aren't fans of radio shock jock Howard Stern, the following must-see video (must-hear audio, actually) exposes the dirty little secret about why so many folks are supporting Barack Obama (hint -- it has NOTHING to do with his policy positions.

Frankly, Stern could have sent folks out to most newsrooms in America and gotten the same responses!
Yup- a lot of these people vote.

And-- some of them are given mortgages, as well, which could possibly result in a lot of problems I would imagine.

Related video, below-- Obama supporter: "I won't have to worry about putting gas in my car. I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage. You know, if I help him, he's gonna help me":



(Cross posted on A Deeper Look)


Digg!
(Vote for this article on Digg)

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Example of Blatant Media Bias

Compare how Barbara Walters received McCain versus Obama. Do you detect any bias? Does she work for Obama?

Black Panthers Employ Voter Intimidation Tactics In Philadelphia

Imagine what would happen if this was skinheads wearing McCain buttons.











Michael comments: Anyone still think the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security are good ideas? Those instruments of tyranny are soon to be handed over to Obama. Without those unconstitutional powers our future would look a whole lot better.

Is that the Reichstag I smell burning, or have I left the ovens on again?

Catholics And Muslims Begin Landmark Talks At Vatican

From Reuters:


VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – Senior Vatican and Islamic scholars launched their first Catholic-Muslim Forum on Tuesday to improve relations between the world's two largest faiths by discussing what unites and divides them.

The three-day meeting comes two years after Pope Benedict angered the Muslim world with a speech implying Islam was violent and irrational. In response, 138 Muslim scholars invited Christian churchesto a new dialogue to foster mutual respect through a better understanding of each other's beliefs.

In their manifesto, "A Common Word," the Muslims argued that both faiths shared the core principles of love of God and neighbor. The talks focus on what this means for the religions and how it can foster harmony between them.

The meeting, including an audience with Pope Benedict, is the group's third conference with Christians after talks with United States Protestants in July and Anglicans last month.

Delegation leaders Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran and Bosnian Grand Mufti Mustafa Ceric opened the session with a moment of silence so delegations, each comprising 28 members and advisers, could say their own prayers for its success.

"It was a very cordial atmosphere," one delegate said.

Charles Schumer is the enemy of free speech

Schumer on Fox: Fairness Doctrine 'fair and balanced'
By Bob Cusack
Posted: 11/04/08 11:30 AM [ET]

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday defended the so-called Fairness Doctrine in an interview on Fox News, saying, "I think we should all be fair and balanced, don't you?"

Schumer's comments echo other Democrats' views on reviving the Fairness Doctrine, which would require radio stations to balance conservative hosts with liberal ones.

Asked if he is a supporter of telling radio stations what content they should have, Schumer used the fair and balanced line, claiming that critics of the Fairness Doctrine are being inconsistent.

"The very same people who don't want the Fairness Doctrine want the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] to limit pornography on the air. I am for that... But you can't say government hands off in one area to a commercial enterprise but you are allowed to intervene in another. That's not consistent."
Never mind the incredible reasoning..we are getting you loud and clear
Time for offshore, and satellite braodcasting...and offshore server farms.
You want to have equal response?
START YOUR OWN RADIO SHOW OR BLOG AND ANSWER BACK.
If the market responds, they have voted your response as being valuable.

Everyone who voted for Obama and the dems today.... YOU HAVE A HAND IN THIS.
THE END OF BROADCAST TALK RADIO.

In 2007, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a close ally of Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) told The Hill, "It's time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. I have this old-fashioned attitude that when Americans hear both sides of the story, they're in a better position to make a decision."

Senate Rules Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) last year said, "I believe very strongly that the airwaves are public and people use these airwaves for profit. But there is a responsibility to see that both sides and not just one side of the big public questions of debate of the day are aired and are aired with some modicum of fairness."

Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would cut into profits so significantly that radio executives would opt to scale back on conservative radio programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from the FCC.

They also note that conservative radio shows has been far more successful than liberal ones.

In his Fox interview, Schumer, who heads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, also weighed in on the election, predicting that Democrats will end up with between 56 and 58 seats in the Senate.

He also defended "card check" legislation, claiming there is a strong need to allow workers a private ballot to register their votes on whether to organize a union.
Schumer said "there has to be some counter" to the leverage businesses have, claiming "employers have every leg up on people who want to organize and that's why union workers have gone down from about 25 percent to 6 percent [in the private sector]."

Business groups adamantly oppose the card check bill, which passed the House and fell short of the necessary votes to overcome a filibuster in the Senate.

Charles Schumer:

Enemy of Free Speech, enemy of secret ballot, whore for union money and contributions, unfit to be senator.

The divides in this nation are going to be historic.

Irretrievable.

Sharia Finance - Infidels Financing Their Own Murder

From Frank Gaffney in the Washington Times:

The U.S. Treasury Department is submitting to Shariah - the seditious religio-political-legal code authoritative Islam seeks to impose worldwide under a global theocracy.

As reported in this space last week, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Robert Kimmitt set the stage with his recent visit to Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich Persian Gulf states. His stated purpose was to promote the recycling of petrodollars in the form of foreign investment here.

Evidently, the price demanded by his hosts is that the U.S. government get with the Islamist financial program. While in Riyadh, Mr. Kimmitt announced: "The U.S. government is currently studying the salient features of Islamic banking to ascertain how far it could be useful in fighting the ongoing world economic crisis."


"Islamic banking" is a euphemism for a practice better known as "Shariah-Compliant Finance (SFC)." And it turns out that this week the Treasury will be taking officials from various federal agencies literally to school on SFC.

The department is hosting a half-day course entitled "Islamic Finance 101" on Thursday at its headquarters building. Treasury's self-described "seminar for the policy community" is co-sponsored with the leading academic promoters of Shariah and SCF in the United States: Harvard University Law School's Project on Islamic Finance. At the very least, the U.S. government evidently hopes to emulate Harvard's success in securing immense amounts of Wahhabi money in exchange for conforming to the Islamists' agenda. Like Harvard, Treasury seems utterly disinterested in what Shariah actually is, and portends.

Unfortunately, such submission - the literal meaning of "Islam" - is not likely to remain confined long to the Treasury or its sister agencies. Thanks to the extraordinary authority conferred on Treasury since September, backed by the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), the department is now in a position to impose its embrace of Shariah on the U.S. financial sector. The nationalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Treasury's purchase of - at last count - 17 banks and the ability to provide, or withhold, funds from its new slush-fund can translate into unprecedented coercive power.

Concerns in this regard are only heightened by the prominent role Assistant Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari will be playing in "Islamic Finance 101." Mr. Kashkari, the official charged with administering the TARP fund, will provide welcoming remarks to participants. Presumably, in the process, he will convey the enthusiasm about Shariah-Compliant Finance that appears to be the current party line at Treasury.

As this enthusiasm for SCF ramps up in Washington officialdom, it is worth recalling a lesson from "across the pond." Earlier this year, the head of the Church of England, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, provoked a brief but intense firestorm of controversy with his declaration that it was "unavoidable" that Shariah would be practiced in Britain. Largely unremarked was the reason he gave for such an ominous forecast: The U.K. had already accommodated itself to Shariah-Compliant Finance.

This statement provides an important insight for the incumbent U.S. administration and whomever succeeds it: Shariah-Compliant Finance serves as a leading edge of the spear for those seeking to insinuate Shariah into Western societies.

Regrettably, SCF is not the only instrument of the stealth jihad by which Shariah-promoting Islamists are seeking to achieve "parallel societies" here and elsewhere in the West. The British experience is instructive on this score, too. Her Majesty's government has allowed the establishment of at least five Shariah courts to hear (initially) family law cases. Polygamists in the U.K. can get welfare for each of their wives (as long as all the marriages beyond the first were performed overseas).

Thus far, we in this country may not have reached the point where evidence of this sort of creeping Shariah is so manifest. But Treasury's accommodation to SCF demonstrates that we are on the same trajectory - the one ordained and demanded by the promoters of Shariah, one to which we serially accommodate ourselves at our extreme peril.


The most dangerous thing about Sharia Finance is that it dictates the giving of Zakat; donation to Islamic Charity. 

Zakāh "alms for the poor" (Arabic: زكاة‎ IPA: [zækæːh] is the Islamic principle of giving a percentage of one's income to charity. It is often compared to the system of tithing and alms but unlike these older systems, it serves principally as the welfare contribution to poor and deprived people in the Muslim lands, although others may have a rightful share. 

It is the duty of the state not just to collect it; but to distribute it fairly as well.

Zakat is one of the Five Pillars of Islam.

It is an obligation on Muslims to pay 1/40th (2.5%) of the wealth which they have had for a full lunar year, 2.5% of goods used for trade, and 5% or 10% of certain type of harvests depending on irrigation. Exempt from Zakat are a person's house and personal transportation.

The reality is the prohibition against the paying of interest in Islamic Finance is not real. In Islamic Finance, the bank buys the home, and you pay them rent on it for a pre-determined number of years, at which point, the home is yours. Over the years, the bank makes money by charging you more rent (in total) on the home than if you had bought the home outright with cash.

There is no fundamental distinction between that and our system of finance, wherein the bank buys the home for you and you pay the principle pluspre-determined interest.

So, if there is no difference between Islamic Finance and our system of Finance in that way, then why is it that Muslims want us to "submit" to Sharia-compliant finance? In my opinion, the primary reason is, precisely, that the institution of Zakat, which, as Wikipedia makes clear, is Islamic taxation.

Follow the money. So goes the wise dictum.

The Muslim world wants America to pay taxes to Islamic Charities. And, let us be clear, Islamic Charities are known to finance the Jihad. And, of course, that would be the Jihad against Infidels like you and me.

They want us to pay for them to kill us. Do you understand?

By the way, I ran an article on the subject of Sharia Finance by Ilana Friedman yesterday. Today, I am running this article from Frank Gaffney. Both Friedman and Gaffney are known to be brilliant students of the problems we face with the Jihad.

Yet, neither dealwith Zakat, which is the primary affront we face with regard to Islamic Finance.

The purpose of Sharia-compliant finance is to get Infidels to pay for their own murder. If our best minds do not understand, or are not clear about this fact, then we are in trouble.

By the way, let us take note of one other thing here. Zakat is, in its stated essence, Socialism. Indeed, many Islamist parties in the Muslim world are Socialist. 

As Wikipedia states, Zakat is, "the welfare contribution to poor and deprived people in the Muslim lands," and, "It is the duty of the state not just to collect it; but to distribute it fairly as well." 

That fits very well with Barack Obama's plans for America, doesn't it? Whether he means for his economic policy to be Sharia-compliant or not, the temptation would be there for him to make agreements with Muslim countries, to do what he has already states he intends to do, and to call it Islamic Finance. 

After all, what could it hurt, as long as no one is pointing out the dangers of Zakat being diverted to Jihad?


2004 , Philly rigged voting machines that showed nearly 2,000 votes for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry before the polls had opened ..and now ..monitors EJECTED

Townhall:
A Repeat of 2004 Philly Voter Chaos, Fraud
Posted by: Amanda Carpenter at 7:46 AM
EXCLUSIVE, DEVELOPING--

GOP Election Board members have been tossed out of polling stations in at least half a dozen polling stations in Philadelphia because of their party status.

A Pennsylvania judge previously ruled that court-appointed poll watchers could be NOT removed from their boards by an on-site election judge, but that is exactly what is happening.

It is the duty of election board workers to monitor and guard the integrity of the voting process.

Denying access to the minority (in this case Republican) poll watchers and inspectors is a violation of Pennsylvania state law. Those who violate the law can be punished with a misdemeanor and subjected to a fine of $1,000 and sent to prison between one month and two years.

Those on site as describing it as "pandemonium" and there may be video coming of the chaos.

Some of the precincts where Republicans have been removed are: the 44th Ward, 12th and 13th divisions; 6th Ward, 12th division; 32nd Ward, Division 28.

"Election board officials guard the legitimacy of the election process and the idea that Republicans are being intimidated and banned for partisan purposes does not allow for an honest and open election process," said McCain-Palin spokesman Ben Porritt in a statement to Townhall.

The City of Brotherly Love was roiled in controversy during the 2004 election because of rigged voting machines that showed nearly 2,000 votes for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry before the polls had opened. A man also used a gun to intimidate poll workers at Ward 30, division 11 in 2004.

A Good Point

"Perhaps the greatest of all ironies in the present-day Middle East, as David Horowitz has pointed out, is that Arab Israelis enjoy more social, legal and political freedom than do Arabs in any one of the fifty-three Muslim countries."

- From an article on TROP, Understanding the Arab-Israeli Conflict.

Obama-Farrakhan Ties Are Close, Ex-Farrakhan Aide Says


From Kenneth Timmerman:

A former top deputy to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan tells Newsmax that Barack Obama’s ties to the black nationalist movement in Chicago run deep, and that for many years the two men have had “an open line between them” to discuss policy and strategy, either directly or through intermediaries.

“Remember that for years, if you were a politician in Chicago, you had to have some type of relationship with Louis Farrakhan. You had to. If you didn’t, you would be ostracized out of black Chicago,” said Dr. Vibert White Jr., who spent most of his adult life as a member and ultimately top officer of the Nation of Islam.

White broke with the group in 1995 and is now a professor of African-American history at the University of Central Florida in Orlando.

White said Obama was “part of the Chicago scene” where Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. and radicals would go to each other’s events and support each other’s causes.

“Even though Chicago is the third-largest city in the country, within the black community, the political and militant nationalist community is very small. So it wouldn’t be uncommon for [Obama and Farrakhan] to show up at events together, or at least be there and communicate with each other,” White told Newsmax.

The Anti-Defamation League has denounced Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam as a “hate group.”

Farrakhan has called Jews “bloodsuckers,” “satanic” and accused them of running the slave trade. He has labeled gays as “degenerates.” In a 2006 speech, the ADL again condemned Farrakhan when he said: “These false Jews promote the filth of Hollywood that is seeding the American people and the people of the world and bringing you down in moral strength. … It's the wicked Jews the false Jews that are promoting lesbianism, homosexuality. It's wicked Jews, false Jews that make it a crime for you to preach the word of God, then they call you homophobic!"

Obama was careful to “denounce” Farrakhan’s comments – but not the man -- during the Democratic primary season earlier this year, but only after Hillary Clinton called him out for benefiting from Farrakhan’s support.

Farrakhan endorsed Obama in a videotaped speech to his followers at Mosque Miryam in Chicago in February. “You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth,” Farrakhan said.

He told the crowd that Obama was the new “messiah.” See Video: Farrakhan Endorses Obama, Calls Him Messiah.

Once the news media and the Clinton campaign got hold of those comments from Farrakhan, demands mounted from all sides that Obama “renounce” Farrakhan.

But as he has done repeatedly throughout this campaign, Obama was careful to parse his words.

“You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan's anti-Semitic comments,” he said during one appearance on “Meet the Press.” “I think that they are unacceptable and reprehensible.”

Obama hastened to point out that Farrakhan had been praising him as “an African-American who seems to be bringing the country together. I obviously can't censor him, but it is not support that I sought. And we’re not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with Minister Farrakhan.”

But Obama, once again, was less than candid.

In 1995, according to a profile of Obama that appeared in the Chicago Reader newspaper, Obama “took time off from attending campaign coffees to attend October’s Million Man March in Washington, D.C.”

At the time, Obama was running for the Illinois Senate from Chicago’s South Side, a seat he won after getting surrogates to challenge the signatures on nominating petitions for his chief rival, the incumbent Alice Palmer.

The march, which fell far short of attracting the million men it advertised, was organized by Farrakhan and by Obama’s then-pastor, the anti-white black nationalist Wright.

Obama spoke at length with the Chicago Reader upon his return from the Million Man March. “What I saw was a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for African-American men to come together to recognize each other and affirm our rightful place in the society," he said.

“These are mean, cruel times, exemplified by a ‘lock ’em up, take no prisoners’ mentality that dominates the Republican-led Congress,” Obama said.

“Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn't care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing."

“Black nationalism” is a current of thought and political action in the African-American community that has been championed by the likes of Farrakhan, Wright, Malcolm X, the Black Panthers and Khalid al-Mansour. Obama discussed his attraction to black nationalism at length in his 1995 memoir “Dreams of My Father.”

Obama further parsed his words in a Feb. 25, 2008, presentation to a Jewish community meeting in Cleveland, Ohio, where he insisted that Wright “does not have a close relationship with Louis Farrakhan.”

And yet, just months earlier, Wright’s Trumpet magazine gave Farrakhan its Lifetime Achievement Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award, saying that Farrakhan “truly epitomized greatness.”

That award was the fruit of a long and deep relationship between the two men, White told Newsmax. In 1984, Wright accompanied Farrakhan on his much-criticized trip to meet Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, at a time when Gadhafi was considered an enemy of the United States.

Wright also accompanied Farrakhan and Jackson to Syria in 1986, where they successfully negotiated with Syrian strongman for the release of downed American pilot Robert O. Goodman.

Obama’s Speaking Style

In addition to the ideological affinity Obama expressed for the black nationalist movement, White believes that Obama owes much of his success as a public orator to speaking techniques that Farrakhan developed over the years, and exploited for years to great success.

“If you listen to the rhetoric and you take away Obama’s political jargon, you hear a religious tenor to it that is very much Nation of Islam-like. I don’t know if anyone has ever touched on it, but Obama’s speaking style is very Malcolm-like, very Farrakhan-like,” White said.

Any American who has listened to early radio or television interviews of Obama can hear how dramatically Obama’s speaking style has changed since he became a United States senator.

In clips dating from 2001 and even early 2004, Obama speaks haltingly and in long, rambling sentences packed with legalese and dense pseudo-academic rhetoric. But not today.

“As a former minister of the Nation of Islam, I know how they speak,” White told Newsmax. “I don’t know who was training Obama. But that style is not a ministerial style like in the Christian church. It’s a Nation of Islam style.”

White began in the late 1970s as a foot soldier in the Fruit of Islam, the military branch of Farrakhan’s Black Muslim group, then rose to become a minister of the Nation of Islam and a top deputy to Farrakhan himself.

Known initially as Brother Vibert L.X., and later as Minister V.L. Muhammad, he parted ways with Farrakhan not long after the Million Man March, after nearly 25 years within the organization.

White’s 2002 book “Inside the Nation of Islam” prompted death threats by Farrakhan loyalists, so he left Illinois and moved to Florida to teach at the University of Central Florida.

He told Newsmax that Obama’s remarkable speaking style, even his manner of standing at a podium to appear larger than life, is directly copied from Farrakhan.

“If the Nation of Islam can’t do anything else, it can train people how to speak. And nobody can outspeak a Muslim minister,” he said.

Earlier this year, a pro-Clinton blog run by former CIA officer Larry Johnson unearthed a 2004 photograph showing Michelle Obama and Farrakahn’s wife, Mother Khadijah Farrakhan, at an event hosted by Jackson’s Citizenship Education Foundation.

Newsmax queried Obama’s U.S. Senate office, his Chicago office and his campaign press office about his ties to Farrakhan, but did not receive a reply.

Ever since he appeared before the annual policy conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee in June, Obama has attempted to convince the Jewish community that he is pro-Israel.

But his longstanding ties to Farrakhan, Wright and Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi, among others, have disturbed many Jewish community leaders.

Sen. John McCain publicly chastised The Los Angeles Times on Thursday for not releasing a videotape the newspaper said it possessed of a 2003 dinner for Khalidi, where Obama reportedly accused Israel of carrying out a “genocide” against the Palestinians.

Mullahs With Nukes


Iran says it tested nuclear bomb

An senior Iranian source has told Israel Insider that a weekend earthquake in Iran measuring 5.0 on the Richter scale was actually an underground nuclear bomb test.

The source, who claims he is a scientist aiding Iran's uranium enrichment efforts, also said that the tremor was the second in a series of nuclear tests. He said the first was recorded as a 4.8 earthquake on October 21 with its epicenter just three miles from the center of the more recent seismic event.

He said that China and North Korea have helped Iran accelerate its nuclear program far beyond where Western powers believe it stands.

The source went on to reveal that Iran now has two nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles ready for use against Israel, possibly in the coming months.

Monday, November 03, 2008

A Short Video For Your, Uh, Entertainment?

Is Sharia Banking Set To Emerge From the Fallout of the World Economic Crisis?


Thanks to Michael Travis for sending this over to me:


Economic Crisis Fallout
Shari'a Banking

By Ilana Freedman; Editor & CEO, Gerard Group International, Inc.

A dangerous trend is arising from the failing financial markets, as some of our leading financial institutions look to shari'a financing as a possible substitute or addition to our open market system.

Shari'a banking refers to a system of banking activity that is consistent with the principles of Islamic law (shari'a) and forbids earning or paying interest ('riba') on loans. Also included in the prohibitions of Islamic banking is investment in any business that provide goods or services considered contrary to Islamic beliefs, such as businesses which relate to forbidden foods like pork and alcohol, or forbidden activities such as gambling and commercial sex.

The Short History of Shari'a Banking
Proponents of shari'a finance claim that its principles are based on the teaching of the Koran, and that therefore it is more moral, more ethical, more spiritual, and more fair than conventional banking. In reality, the development of Islamic economics is a relatively new concept invented in the 1940s.

The creator of this system was Syed Abul Ala Mawdudi, a radical Pakistani Islamist whose global aspirations for Islam formed his message: "We cannot expect the rest of mankind to embrace Islam without any effort on our part". According to Alex Alexiev, Vice President for research at the Center for Security Policy in Washington, DC, Mawdudi's objective "was to convince the Muslims that Islam was a complete system of guidance in life in all things temporal or sacral and that the West had nothing useful to offer the Muslims. This was an essential part of his agenda for Islamization, which he pursued vigorously for decades." Reference here.

By the late 20th century a number of Islamic banks had been formed to apply these principles to private or semi-private commercial institutions within the Muslim community. Today, some are calling shari'ah banking called Islamic finance "the fastest-growing of all the financial sectors around the world". In order to avoid the one of the latest trends is one more closely allied to public relations than economics.

When referring to Islamic banking proponents of shari'a banking are encouraged to use the word 'ethical' instead of 'shari'a'. Promotion for a full-day event at Dubai International Finance Center in November 2007, held in association with The Wall Street Journal, was called Islamic and Ethical Finance . called Islamic finance "the fastest-growing of all the financial sectors around the world".

How It Works
Islamic banking principles forbid the paying or receiving of interest, so profits must be derived in different ways, largely through fees and contributions. With the rise of Islam to prominence in world affairs, shari'a banking principles have been more widely adopted throughout the world. In both Iran and Pakistan, the entire banking systems have been Islamized. The phenomenon has been spreading rapidly by global financial institutions. The recent upsurge in efforts by Islamic financing groups to control the US capital markets has reached an estimated $1 trillion.

Competing in the Free Market
In shari'a financing, home mortgages represent a creative adaptation of conventional mortgages. It works like this: a shari'a bank buys a house and then sells it back to the 'buyer', who pays a rental fee on the use of the house plus a monthly payment that is applied to the eventual purchase price. At the end of the term of the mortgage, the 'renter' becomes the 'buyer' and owns the house.

Likewise, savings accounts follow a shari'a compliant formula. A shari'a compliant bank invests the money deposited in savings accounts by its customers in shari'a approved investments (investments that do not involve forbidden products or activities). The returns are dividends and capital gains which are put in a fund that pays out the regular market savings account interest rate. This is similar to a standard bank savings account, but the money is not insured.

Shari'a finance is largely based on equity markets, excluding, of course, interest bearing instruments, such as bonds. The stock of companies whose product relates to pork, alcohol, and corporations are also excluded from these portfolios. Hedge funds are particularly well suited to the rules of Shari'a finance.
The current global economic malaise presents an opportunity to proponents of shari'a finance that is unparalleled. In "Shari'a Finance: a gift from Islam to the world".

Swati Taneja, director of the International Islamic Finance Forum,suggests that, "Now is a golden opportunity for Islamic finance to provide an alternative model which, by its very nature, binds both the real and financial economies - just what the world needs right now . . . There has never been a more interesting time for cautious investors burned in the conventional credit crunch to begin looking at what the Islamic markets have to offer . . Islamic finance is set to make the world a better place".

Shari'a banking is a well-established and rapidly growing industry, which claims to be different from 'regular' banking (which indeed it is), and promotes itself as the financial redeemer that the West, (which it certainly is not).
Most significantly, shari'a banks boast about their charitable activities, while hiding the shadowy links between such charities and the global support to terrorist organizations, which is carried out through the shari'a banking system.

For example, several of the 9/11 terrorists were financed through the banks in Dubai, and Palestinian suicide terrorists have been systematically supported by contributions from the national Saudi Bank. Closer to home, the Safa Group, working out of Virginia until they were shut down several years ago, strung together over 100 'not-for-profits' and 'legitimate' commercial enterprises, provided massive financial resources through shari'a fundraising and money laundering. Organizations like the Holyland Foundation in Richardson, Texas were shut down because of their use of charitable contributions to support terrorist activities.

According to shari'afinancewatch.org, some of the largest American banks and investment houses are now shari'a compliant, including Barclays PLC, Citibank, N.A., Dow Jones & Company Inc., Goldman Sachs Group, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and Morgan Stanley.

As we watch our Western institutions - universities, the military, government agencies , prisons, even our elementary schools and local governments - slowly eroded through the well-organized infiltration by radical Muslims, it should come as no surprise that our financial institutions, which were built on the concepts of free enterprise and free markets, are already threatened by a foreign and dangerous form of economic corruption. The funds that used to go to fire the engines of commerce are now also firing the demons of terrorism and global warfare.

Barack Obama And The Destruction Of The U.S. Constitution

Yesterday, I asked the question, why is it that Barack Obama wants to institute a "Civilian National Security Force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded (as the U.S. Military) ..."

Here's the video:



Why would he say that? Why do we need a separate security force to achieve "national security objectives"? 

What are these national security objectives? Barack Obama is not telling, and no one in the media is asking?

Does he mean this civilian national security force to be a new Peace Corps? If so, why did he not explain it that way?



Basically, what Obama is talking about is creating a Committee for the Defense of Liberal Ideology and Political correctness funded by a half trillion taxpayer dollars. National Security for this crowd is not about stopping terrorists from killing our children. National Security means to teach our children to understand the terrorists and their motivations so that our children can learn how to live their lives submissively so as not to offend the sensitivities of the very sensitive America haters.

Their version of National Security is to force you to act for the common good of society and not in your own best interest. Since this goes against human nature, the half trillion dollar “Civilian National Security Force” will have to force Americans to change their nature and create a new citizen that is self sacrificing and collective in nature-an ant-like new man, like Che's and Fidel's new man.

This concept is eerily similar to the Castroite CDR block snitch network that I grew up with only better funded and more ideologically pure. Next thing you know Barry O. will set up “field schools” where middle school children will have to go on month long stays to cultivate the bio fuels that will replace gasoline...

So when I'm President, I will set a goal for all American middle and high school students to perform 50 hours of service a year, and for all college students to perform 100 hours of service a year. This means that by the time you graduate college, you'll have done 17 weeks of service

No wonder Fidel calls him the more "advanced" presidential candidate.

Be afraid, be very afraid.


Taking into account the fact that Barack Obama has also spoken out about his belief that the American Constitution is a  fundamentally flawed document, Ken Taylor at the Minority Report makes the case that Barack Obama is interested in destroying portions of our Constitution:


The audio that has been front and center over the past few days in the 2008 Presidential election in which Barack Obama outlines how redistribution of wealth could be accomplished, and how the Supreme Court failed in the rulings concerning Civil Rights to bring about redistribution is also a telling showcase in how Obama views our Constitution.

Several times during the interview Obama talks of what he believes as Constitutional short comings and even mentions that the Court in its ruling failed because it chose to adhere to Constitutional constraints.

So the question must be asked does Barack Obama even believe in our Constitution especially in light of the fact that he running for President and that the primary responsibility of the office is to ,"preserve and protect the Constitution."

When referencing the Supreme Court and the Court rulings concerning Civil Rights in the sixties Obama in his own words believed that the court failed to address redistribution of wealth because the court, "didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution." In other words Obama believes that the court should over step Constitutional limitations or legislate from the bench regardless of whether that which is before the Court is in adherence to the Constitution.

This one statement reveals Obama's idea as to what he believes is the duty of a Justice of the Supreme Court. To ignore the constraints that are placed in the Constitution on the responsibilities of the court and use the power of the court to create law rather than administer law as defined in the Constitution.

Obama as stated in the audio does not believe that the Constitution is adequate in addressing the idea of not only redistribution of wealth but government intervention in the lives of the people. He stated, "the Constitution is a document of negative liberties [that] says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you but it doesn't say what the federal government or state government MUST DO ON YOUR BEHALF."

Does he not understand that the reason that the Framers of the Constitution did not state, "what the federal and state government must do on your behalf," was because the Founding Fathers believed that government was not the solution or the fix and that the people should have the right and ability to achieve without government intervention ?




No, I think Barack Obama does indeed understand that fundamental truth about our nation's founding. After all, he's not dumb. You learn this stuff in seventh grade Civics class.

But, Barack Obama is promising Change. And, his words would indicate the Constitution is one of those things he intends on changing.

And, by the way, has anyone every heard him talking about "Amending the Constitution" to institute change? You know, going through the whole legislative and ratification process?

No, I've never heard him talking about such a process.

But, I have heard him talk about having a "Civilian National Security Force which is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as the American Military.

I ask again, what does he intend to do with that security force? And, why is it that no one in the our paternalistic media is asking?

Tomorrow's News Today - Barack Obama, President Of The United States

What To Do If You're A Democrat And Obama Loses