'cookieChoices = {};'


The Right of the People to be Secure in their Persons, Houses, Papers, and Effects,
Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures,
Shall Not Be Violated

click.jpg

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Comey testifies tomorrow, but we need to hear Michael Schmidt, Matt Rosenberg, Adam Goldman, Matt Apuzzo, and Judge Andrew Napolitano

During the week(s) ahead, aside from the 3 phase monty schlemiel contest of health care, we are going to find out just much Trump exists in opposition to BOTH parties by their action in the House investigation of Putin>Trump>NSA/FBI/CIA Wiretaps.
If this investigation calls Comey who goes all Sgt Schultz, saying they could find no 

‘conclusive’evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign, and Putin and saying he can also find no evidence of a ‘wiretap’ (whose exact definition has fallen into the same category as Trump’s OBVIOUS joke about inviting Russia to find the 30k emails) , and the investigation really GOES NO FURTHER in  any significant way, then we can all conclude the Republicans want to bring Trump to heel with the political class as much as the Dems, just not as disgustingly, and publicly.
We all know the NYT published on Jan 20th the story of the wiretaps (and WE ALL KNOW THAT MEANS ELECTRONIC OBSERVATION OF ANY TYPE). We know who wrote the story AND the subsequent story after Trump called attention to his being wiretapped on March 4th.
All three reporters need to face the American people and testify.
We also now all have heard about Judge Napolitano REPORTING that he has been told by 3 separate sources in the IC that Trump Tower servers HAD BEEN observed (THEY ALL ARE) and the detailed content of those records, part of the NSA electronics vacuum cleaner, and despite a 5 nation agreement not to use each other to violate their own domestic laws had been REPORTED back to the Obama administration by Britain’s IC.
The NYT could not have reported as it did on Flynn, unless the story of wiretapping is true or the sources are liars. The same for a US Judge.
LET’S FIND OUT.
We have a public example of how it’s done.

 But if the investigation calls Comey and then a bunch of nebbishes or others like the new DNI Chief, you can bet this is not and was never intended to be an honest uncovering of REALITY.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Epaminondas at permanent link#

9 Comments:

Blogger Pastorius said...

Shep Smith made a huge deal of attempting to undermine Napolitano just yesterday:

Shep Smith: 'Fox News Cannot Confirm Judge Napolitano's Commentary'

http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/shep-smith-fox-news-cannot-confirm-judge-napolitanos-commentary/324136

Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:34:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

The way he phrased that sounds to me as if he was ORDERED to say that on air.

Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:34:00 pm  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

Smith is out of control, IMO. I beliwve he has full editorial control, and I am thinking 3PM eastern is the low audience point of the day.

I actually STOP watching fox if it's on at 3PM

It's a good time to scratch my ass

Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:37:00 pm  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

BTW I never used to feel this way,, but Smith has LOST IT over Trump.

Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:43:00 pm  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

BTW, 'Fox news cannot confirm' can also just as easily mean Napolitano won;t tell them who his sources are as well as 'we can;t find these guy' or 'we don't believe our own JUDGE'

If Smith was personally refused by Napolitano then Smith's statement is also 'true'

Sunday, March 19, 2017 12:45:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

Right.

And, Shep Smith is an idiot.

I have always had the feeling with him that he was hired to be a pretty boy, got older, and convinced himself that, since he wasn't pretty anymore, he must be smart. And his way of convincing himself he's smart is to lock in rock solid with the things the people in DC tell him to be true.

Sunday, March 19, 2017 2:14:00 pm  
Blogger Always On Watch said...

if the investigation calls Comey and then a bunch of nebbishes or others like the new DNI Chief, you can bet this is not and was never intended to be an honest uncovering of REALITY.

I expect "the investigation" to do exactly that.

I've lost faith in the Congress critters.

Sunday, March 19, 2017 3:54:00 pm  
Blogger Pastorius said...

I have not read anything that indicates that Trump has actually presented any logical evidence to back up his claim of wiretapping.

If that is so, then I am giving up on Trump too. It it is so, he will not be a success as President.

Sunday, March 19, 2017 4:01:00 pm  
Blogger Epaminondas said...

If Napolitano is correct in his sources and reporting, there will be NO EVIDENCE since an ally will have simply LOOKED/listened at/to files available to them via the NSA's collection of everything, identified by metadata they have admitted they have previously, and then reported the contents informally back to the WH.

Unless someone flips, it is an invisible crime.

It's like you can access files of software license numbers on my network, and the world knows I allow you connections to those files I have spent years collecting, and you always have the directory information (metadata). You can at any time get the files and the data and extract the information you want, and give it to a third party. There may not even be records of the connection to get the file.

Unless there is an audit record which is pertinent and legal (FOR SPY AGENCIES?) there is no evidence at all that the files were even accessed, ket alone given to a 3rd party

Sunday, March 19, 2017 6:03:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Older Posts Newer Posts