'cookieChoices = {};'


The Right of the People to be Secure in their Persons, Houses, Papers, and Effects,
Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures,
Shall Not Be Violated

click.jpg

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Obama, The Hawaiian Judge, and Trump's Executive Order on Immigration from Terror-Exporting Nations



He’s traveling, holding meetings, getting something done. Who knows what it is? No doubt Obama will become one of the leaders of the “resistance,” with occasional statements and plenty of work behind the scenes. Former President Barack Obama was spotted Monday in Hawaii, adding to what has been a busy several days for the 44th president, the Washington Examiner reported.
Lenin touring the US. Before his next October revolution. 

Paul Joseph Watson tweets:

"Main reason for the judge blocking the travel ban is that Hawaiians won't be able to visit relatives in Muslim countries. Incredible."


AND:

Leftist Judge Produces 43 Page Decision Within 2 HOURS of Hearing State’s Request for Block on Trump Refugee Ban

The Hawaii judge issued his decision in less than 2 hours after hearing arguments. His decision is 43 pages long with multiple quotes. In other words, he took what he heard, “deliberated” and researched the quotes, the wrote 43 pages in under 120 minutes – thats a page every 3 minutes. No f’ing way he churned that decision out in that amount of time with enough time to research before and re-read/edit after.
Evelyn Wood+ touch typing lessons - legal thought= decision

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link#

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

it’s looking like Barry handed off the ruling on his trip to HIGatewayPundit: Leftist Judge produces 43 page decision within 2 hours of hearing blocks trump refugee ban
********
1950 SC Decision already addresses the travel ban:
Knauff v. Shaughnessy:
“It is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by [congressional] law, to review the determination of the political branch of Government to exclude a given alien.”
******
In the United States, jurisdiction-stripping (also called court-stripping or curtailment-of-jurisdiction), refers to Congress’ constitutionally-granted authority to determine the jurisdiction of federal and state courts.
Congress may define the jurisdiction of the judiciary through the simultaneous use of two powers.[1] First, Congress holds the power to create (and, implicitly, to define the jurisdiction of) federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court (i.e. Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and various other Article I and Article III tribunals). This court-creating power is granted both in the congressional powers clause (Art. I, § 8, Cl. 9) and in the judicial vesting clause (Art. III, § 1). Second, Congress has the power to make exceptions to and regulations of the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. This court-limiting power is granted in the Exceptions Clause (Art. III, § 2). By exercising these powers in concert, Congress may effectively eliminate any judicial review of certain federal legislative or executive actions and of certain state actions, or alternatively transfer the judicial review responsibility to state courts by “knocking [federal courts]…out of the game.”[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisdiction_stripping

Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:27:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


Older Posts Newer Posts