These two photographs pretty neatly sum up everything we are trying to say:
"Two unidentified Afghan Women chat with each other a few minutes before they were executed by Taliban in Ghazni province, Afghanistan, on late Saturday, July 12, 2008. Taliban fighters told Associated Press Television News that the two were executed for allegedly running a prostitution ring ..."
"Local people watch two Afghan women shot and killed by Taliban in Ghazni province, Afghanistan, on Sunday, July 13, 2008. Taliban fighters told Associated Press Television News that the two were executed for allegedly running a prostitution ring ... "
Sharia law calls for death for
1) Adulterers (prostitution falls under that ...)
2) Homosexual (carpet-munching and bicycle-racing are forbidden)
3) Apostasy (no making up your own mind as to whether to believe in God, or which God to believe in, or how to believe in Him, or Her, or It)
Sharia law is an abomination on the Earth. It is, quite literally, against every Constitution of every government in the Western world.
The advocacy of Sharia law is sedition, because it is calling for the overthrow of our Constitutions.
We will know we are serious about winning this war against "Islamofascism" when we actually make a law which proclaims the advocacy of Sharia to be sedition.
10 comments:
Pastorius,
Ideally every western democracy should pass a constitutional amendment specially banning Sharia law in addition to calling its advocacy sedition. That way, even the rare parts of Sharia that are not clearly in violation of human rights could be stopped. Kick the camel's noise out of the tent, before the rest of the beast can enter. You might argue that amending any constitution is unnecessary, but if the constitution specifically forbid any Sharia Law, it would make it much more difficult for Muslim groups to start things like Sharia courts here in the west. Could you imagine how much more difficult it could be for the cultural Jihadists in a nation with a constitution that was not only incompatible with Sharia Law, but specifically forbid all Sharia Law?
Pastorius,
Not to mention it might make it a little harder on us to tolerate the establishment of Sharia in other countries once we have defeated their former government.
Pastorius,
The only real problem I can think of is what would be the best wording for an anti Sharia constitutional amendment? I am thinking specifically of an amendment for the United States constitution, since that's where I live. But other countries could draft their own. We would have to make it very clear and very specific. Any unintentional loop hole, no matter how small could be used by Islam-o-Fascists to try to defang the amendment. We would have to make it very clear that no court should ever be allowed to use Sharia as a basis for a legal decision. Also it would have to spell out exactly why sharia is so incomparable with individual rights.
Also we would need to make it clear in the amendment, why the amendment was necessary.
Pastorius,
Speaking of anti-Sharia, check this out! Did you see the Frontpagemag article on this guy before?
Anti_Sharia_for_Congress
Do you think he could be the American Geert Wilders? Too bad he wasn't a natural born U.S citizen, otherwise, he might make a good president. If you want, maybe you could post this on the Infidel Bloggers Alliance.
The “before” photo has this caption with it:
Two unidentified Afghan Women chat with each other a few minutes before they were executed by Taliban in Ghazni province, Afghanistan, on late Saturday, July 12, 2008
Whoever wrote that is completely morally bankrupt - here is a photo of two women, kneeling for the purpose of being executed and awaiting the shot that will kill them, and the person who wrote the caption says they are “chatting” as if they just met over coffee . . . the whole episode with those photos is disgusting.
Anyone doubt that the items on the foreground are the entirety of their meager life possessions?
That the "Taliban" continue to exist at all is an abomination to all mankind.
Islam delende est
Annoymous,
The photos do say it all, don't it?
The only question I have is why does it appear to be nightime in the first photo and morning in the second one? Any answers?
Damien,
Thanks for that article.
I will post it.
Speechless...
Infuriated..
Shocked...
yet
numb
Not shocked at all...
where area the human rights abuses protesting fuckin liberal loons from Ringo's flicks now?
CRICKETS pappy
thug hugging perverted freaks
I'll cross post this tomorrow
Pastorius
it's the whole
shot at dawn thing
they were probably raped all night..
then shot at dawn , nu?
Post a Comment