Monday, August 24, 2009
The Parallel Government
Of The Entire World
All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
.
Infidel Babe Of The Week

IBA Quote of the Week.
"The problem is if they think they )the citizens) are not doing anything that’s wrong, they don’t get to define that. The central government does, the central government defines what is right and wrong and whether or not they target you. So, it’s not up to the individuals. Even if they think they aren't doing something wrong, if their position on something is against what the administration has, then they could easily become a target." --- William Binney, National Security Agency
Sharia is Sedition
The Infidel Bloggers Alliance Radio Show
Gathering Storm Report Radio Show
"An Islamic regime must be serious in every field," explained Ayatollah Khomeini. "There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam."
****************
"I want to be very, very clear, however: I understand and agree with the analysis of the problem. There is an imminent threat. It manifested itself on 9/11. It's real and grave. It is as serious a threat as Stalinism and National Socialism were. Let's not pretend it isn't."
~~~~~Bono~~~~~
"I want to be very, very clear, however: I understand and agree with the analysis of the problem. There is an imminent threat. It manifested itself on 9/11. It's real and grave. It is as serious a threat as Stalinism and National Socialism were. Let's not pretend it isn't."
~~~~~Bono~~~~~
****************
IMPORTANT VIDEOS
An Infidel MessageTo Moderate Muslims
OBSESSION
UNDERCOVER MOSQUE
GERT WILDER'S
FITNA
****************
Original Artwork By Bosch Fawstin
Previous
- DisturbedDeify
- The WaPo Addresses Self-Censorship
- Liberty cannot be guaranteed by Law. Nor by anythi...
- But don't take my word for it
- Meanwhile, In The Land of the Infidel
- Islam: Mainstream Media Coverage
- Obama planning attack on Israel at UN assembly
- I'm Telling You, The Tea Party Movement Is A Centr...
- New Fidel Sighting....and Sunday Fun House Video
- Washington Post Editorial Asks, Is Obamacare UnCon...
NOTICE!



9 Comments:
Fast track to becoming the filling in a Mack truck sandwich.
Not so smart after all. I'm sure he/she died feeling very progressive and smug.
Yeah? Who you calling Smug?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5rQM_HAcfA
Somewhere I heard that the crushed car in that photo isn't actually a Smart Car.
And had the smartcar been hit by two other smartcars, chances are the damage would be very minor.
People who drive large cars needlessly may be protecting themselves, but only by endangering other people. Yes, they are safer for whoever occupies them - but only because they will crush anyone else involved in an accident. Choosing a large vehicle for 'safety' strikes me as a very selfish act.
Preserving your own life is a "selfish act"? What are you, a moron?
Suricou Raven,
My questioning mind has drifted off in the same direction as yours has on occasion.
But, here's what I always come back to:
There have to be cargo trucks on the road.
That is not something we can not have. It would not be feasible to load 1000 Smart Cars with the load one Cargo truck carries.
And, therefore, it ought to be everyone's right to choose what type of car they, essentially, want to defend themselves with.
Not to mention, it really is a freedom issue to begin with.
That isn't a Smart Car. The lug nut pattern is wrong. I'm thinkin' GM.
Now there's a good comment.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home