Make no mistake about what is being threatened.
It’s the Constitution, which in the same sentence, protects speech and religion, versus evil’s definition of BLASPHEMY.
Even if one thinks Pamela is a provocateur supreme, even if one thinks she is a reprehensible human for her public, and unrelenting attitude and speech about CERTAIN muslims, Islamists, and Sharia .. how can we apply LESS protection for her speech that than of the ACLU, and their attorney David Goldberger, who, over the Skokie case said “In order to protect our own rights, we must protect the rights of the most obnoxious among us”.
The 1st amendment which is, in fact INTOLERABLE to the sunni and shia fundamentalists because it will ALWAYS result in blasphemy to them, is ALSO the protection under freedom of religion which prevents arbitrary deportation of those we don’t care for, and TOLERATE BY LAW, just because they are unpopular and obnoxious in the public mind of the day.
3 comments:
Don't the American Islamists call their faith, the "religion of peace and tolerance"? .....
Geller didn't need to "provoke" Muslims with a cartoon escapade. She provokes Muslims simply because she is a Jew. That is all the reason ISIS needs to kill her or any Jew. They do not hesitate to say so.
US media has reached the nadir of its existence. They are stupid, they are lazy, they are cowardly, they are worthless.
A loud, assertive, convincing, female american who happens to be jewish would have a certain, 'je ne sais croix', for these clowns, wouldn't she?
Post a Comment