Friday, August 29, 2014

The Muslim Rape of Christian Nuns


From Front Page:
The latest such attack comes from Bangladesh, which is over 90% Muslim in population. In early July, dozens of men armed with machetes, knives and iron rods attacked the convent of PIME (Pontifical Institute of Foreign Missions nuns in Boldipuku), a village mission in north Bangladesh.In the words of Bishop Sebastian Tudu “the nuns were beaten and molested, ending when police arrived.” 
Catholic Online has the complete story: 
[S]ome 60 men attempted to loot the building and rape the nuns… The attackers first tied the hands and legs of the mission’s two night watchmen and gagged them in the early morning hours. They then broke down the door of the room where the assistant pastor Father Anselmo Marandy was sleeping. 
They then raided the convent located in the mission campus…. 
Three PIME nuns suffered attempted rape and were sent to their provincial house in Dhaka, the national capital where they are trying to overcome the shock and mental suffering. 
“It’s very sad that the sisters cannot continue to work for the people, but our sisters are no longer safe,” Rosaline Costa, a Catholic human rights activist lamented. Local Christians are currently living in fear since the attack. Christians form only 0.8 percent of Dinajpur district’s three million people.

More On Roterham Rapes: 'Muslim leaders fully aware of problem but did nothing': Pakistani community worker makes explosive claims on Rotherham's religious leaders who 'talked in mosques but not to police'


They knew about it for "a long time."

But they did not go to the Police.

They refuse to talk about it publicly.

THAT'S BECAUSE INFIDELS SHOULD NOT BE IN CHARGE OF PUNISHING MUSLIMS.

ONLY SHARIA LAW CAN DO THAT.

And in Sharia/Muslim nations, the courts and the police look the other way on Child Molestation.

So yeah. Why would we expect them to do anything about it?

From the Daily Mail:
Pakistani community leaders in Rotherham were complicit in hushing up the shocking ‘ethnic’ dimensions of the sexual exploitation rather than speaking out, it was claimed yesterday. 
Parveen Qureshi, director of the United Multicultural Centre in Rotherham, revealed the shocking issue was widely discussed between leaders who were privately ‘trying to resolve the problem’. 
She refused to name those who kept quiet, but was certain the problem of Asian men abusing white girls was known ‘for a long time’. 
The abuse of at least 1,400 girls at the hands of Pakistani gangs in the South Yorkshire town for 16 years was shrouded in secrecy. 
Yesterday Lord Ahmed, who has lived in Rotherham for most of his life, said it was now up to the ‘mosques and community leaders’ to teach ‘moral and ethical values’ lost to the younger generation. 
Lord Ahmed, a member of the House of Lords who was Rotherham’s first Asian councillor, said yesterday: ‘I am deeply shocked by these heinous despicable crimes committed by young Pakistani men. ‘I do think that there’s a huge amount of responsibility that lies on the shoulders of the mosques and the community leaders because they are responsible for teaching ethical values and respect. 
‘I came to Rotherham in 1969 when the first mosque was opened and we were taught moral and ethical values and mixed with the community. ‘If someone had a call from the police, people would be embarrassed and ashamed.’ He said he was now ‘worried for Rotherham’ in the wake of the child abuse scandal. 
He added: ‘The majority of British Pakistani men are stuck between criminals involved in these problems and a few hundred that are involved with other issues like terrorism or other criminal activity.’
By the way, lest any of us bask in our offense, feeling proud that we Infidels don't do things like this, I say this:

A Society is judged ultimately by how it treats it's women and children, the weakest among us.

The fact that we do nothing in the wake of such heinous crime means that we are a sick and weak society indeed.

Men should not stand idly by while their women and children are raped.
Davina and the Vagabonds
St Michael vs. The Devil


Lipstick and Chrome

CAIR Lawyer Wonders If ISIS Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdad Isi Really A Jew Working For The Mossad?

Even Those With The Intelligence of a Rock Will Say,
"There Is A Jew Hiding Behind Me"

From the Investigative Project on Terrorism:
While the world recoils in horror at the brutality shown by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, an attorney for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) apparently gave serious consideration to a wild conspiracy theory alleging that ISIS is a Mossad and CIA “proxy force.” 
Lena Masri, a CAIR attorney in Detroit, linked from her Facebook page Aug. 22 to an article by Iran’s official news agency, IRNA, about ISIS and its rise to prominence. Among its claims, ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the self-proclaimed caliph of the Islamic State, “is really Simon Elliot, a Jewish agent for the Zionist intelligence agency Mossad.” 
The notion rated a “pants-on-fire” from fact-checking site “Pundit Fact,” three days earlier, but Masri chose instead to put the question out to her Facebook friends. “Any truth to this???” she wrote.
Why, of course, this is the kind of question that troubles "Moderate Muslims". Right?

Thursday, August 28, 2014

“I don’t know what to do about the Japs. Beats me”

What Admiral Halsey DIDN’T SAY in 1942
But:

Obama confesses: ‘We don’t have a strategy yet’ for dealing with Islamic State

President Obama said Thursday he doesn’t have a strategy yet for defeating Islamist militants in Syria.
“I don’t want to put the cart before the horse,” Mr. Obama said in a news conference at the White House. “We don’t have a strategy yet. As our strategy develops, we will consult with Congress.”
"Damn I can’t figure out how to get on the continent and get at those Nazis" What Dwight Eisenhower DIDN’T SAY
"Yamamoto sure got us with our pants down, and now the Navy is at the bottom of Pearl, and we’re FUCKED" What FDR didn’t say
"Well, now that the entire Union Army ran off at Manasas, I don’t have any idea what to do next." What Abe Lincoln didn’t say
"How the hell do we get out of here" What Chesty Puller didn’t say at Chosin
What do actual leaders do when confronted by the unexpected, unpleasant and discouraging?
Here is what Puller said: "We’ve been looking for the enemy for some time now. We’ve finally found him. We’re surrounded. That simplifies things."

It Doesn't Fit The Fact Pattern


Photograph from Marie Harf's Press Conference at the local Hot Dog on a Stick.

Comics Bulletin ignores the dishonesty in Muslim Ms. Marvel writing

Comics Bulletin's published their own fawning over the Muslim Ms. Marvel series, and makes the point for anyone who guessed there'd be dishonesty in how it was promoted:
Another enjoyable element is that Kamala's Muslim faith and upbringing plays a big role in the story. So often in comic books a new character will be introduced with a certain religion or characteristic that is just there so that they can bring it up every now and then so the writer can call it a characteristic. But in Ms. Marvel, Kamala's faith is a huge part of who she is – who she and her family are. They go to mosques, they wear headscarves, and she has to seek advice from her Sheika. Her religion is actually an integral element of the story and the character and is woven well throughout the first seven issues.
Obviously again, this rendition does not admit there's an iota wrong with the Religion of Peace, but what this op-ed also confirms is that, despite any claims to the contrary, Islam does play a significant role in this propaganda, proving Marvel doesn't have the courage to admit they're fine with promoting a particular agenda, and the use of taqqiya (deception).
Though the religious aspect of the story is important, the strongest element in this series is its characters. Rarely has a comic book had this strong a set of characters. Whether it be Zoe, the ditzy blonde girl in school who thinks that she is really reaching out as a friend to Kamala when she really isn't or it be Bruno, Kamala's second-best friend, who only tries to look out for her -- even if that means getting her in trouble with her parents. And there's a plethora of other great supporting characters in this book, such as Sheika Abdula, who initially comes off as a grouchy old man who has disdain for Kamala but is actually very kind and understanding to her plight.

The best set of characters in this book, though, are Kamala and her family. G. Willow Wilson does a fantastic job injecting her family with humanity and believability. They don't feel like cartoonish over-the-top stereotypes they feel like real people. Kamala's brother Jamir is very religious but you understand that he has a deep interest in the teachings and ideals of his faith, Kamala's mother Disha is very shrill and hysterical but it's because she doesn't really understand what the American teenager is like, compared to her upbringing. And Kamala's father Abu-Jann is very stern but clearly cares about Kamala and understands her better than the rest of her family. None of them come off as completely annoying and you really care about Kamala's relationship to all of them and how much they all care for each other.
Curious how the writer says the characters don't feel like stereotypes when, as noted before, the non-Muslim whites (and probably Blacks and Latinos too) come across terribly, and the blonde student is apparently just one of those examples of poor focus on "kuffars" (infidels), if she's portrayed negatively. He fails to consider how the surreal depiction of the family is all done at the expense of some of the guest characters. Yet the mother's rendition is eyebrow raising. Why must the father be portrayed as "caring", yet the mother characterized more as a hothead? And how interesting that this, of all books Marvel could be publishing, is the one allegedly featuring the "brightest" viewpoint, scuttled by how it only serves to mask an ideology thriving on darkness. I've often had the feeling a lot of so-called reviewers do these positive takes deliberately, and wouldn't be surprised if the same applies here. At the end, it says:
Ms. Marvel is a great read for kids, adults teens, women, Muslims, everyone!
It's very dishonest to say it's great for women and children if it's not transparent about the religion's content, yet, as earlier research shows, not every Muslim is enthused either, the propaganda angles notwithstanding. The idea of a girl with powers is not something hardcore Muslims appreciate. And I just remembered: G. Willow Wilson claimed earlier that polymorphs are portrayed negatively, yet Big Bertha is one heroine in the MCU whose power of inflating her structure to huge proportions is very much like polymorphism, which makes Ashley Crawford another character of that kind who's been depicted positively, and Wilson failed to take note of.

Maybe the worst part of this book aside from the politics and artwork is the lowercase lettering that overran Marvel books in the early 2000s and continues to this day. It doesn't look very appealing and makes me realize how much more effective past output was with its largely uppercase lettering.

United Nations To Hold Emergency Meeting On Ukraine


The United Nations Council on Unity, Neutrality and Tolerance (UN-CUNT) will be formulating a strongly worded Flowergram to Mr. Putin.


Russia Invades Ukraine; State Department Pronounces Itself "Concerned"


The Ukrainian PM says that the invasion as begun.

Putin's plan is apparently to not disturb Obama's golf, as he takes over the country bit-by-bit, rather than in one grand offensive.



Morocco Bans The Burkini?


We put up with the Muslims and their shit, while Morocco which is essentially a Muslim country itself, just says NO.

What is wrong with us?

What is right with Morocco?
Muslim Fury as Burkini Banned in Top Hotels 
Thinking of jetting off to Morocco for a last-minute end-of-summer getaway while staying uber modest? Well now you can’t — because hotels across the traditionally Muslim country have banned the burkini. Scores of resorts across the state have slapped a ban on the halal swimsuit, which covers the body and has a head covering attached, because they claim it’s unclean.

This Week On The Gathering Storm: Open Mic

Listen to The Gathering Storm Radio Show, hosted by WC and Always On Watch.

The show broadcasts live for 30 minutes every Friday beginning at noon, Pacific Time.

The call-in number is 646-915-9870. Callers welcome!

Listen to the August 29, 2014 edition of The Gathering Storm Radio Show, live or later, by CLICKING HERE.

UPCOMING SHOWS:
10 Acts of Jihad in America That Americans Haven’t Heard About

A Good Idea: Muslims flee Northern Ireland to escape anti-Islam violence


(This is from June 3 2014. I would like to know if this trend has continued or was it an isolated thing which has been crushed. But it is instructive either way. A minimal amount of fighting back appears to have a large impact.)
WASHINGTON, June 3, 2014 — Some Muslims in Northern Ireland have announced plans to leave the country to avoid anti-Islamic violence. The announcement comes after an attack on a Muslim family in the city of Belfast, when crazed rioters broke into their home and assaulted them.
IF PEOPLE ARE ATTACKING MUSLIMS, AND ARE DEMONSTRATING THEY DON'T WANT MUSLIMS TO LIVE IN THEIR COUNTRIES ANYMORE, IT IS A GOOD IDEA FOR THE MUSLIMS TO LEAVE.

AFTER ALL, THEY HAVE 57 NATIONS TO RETURN HOME TO.

AND MANY OF THOSE NATIONS ARE SHARIA NATIONS, RULED BY THE LAW OF ALLAH.

WHY MUSLIMS WOULD WANT TO LIVE WITH US SCUMMY INFIDELS, I'LL NEVER KNOW.

GOOD ON YOU, MUSLIMS.

LEAVE.

THAT'S THE SMART THING TO DO. 

LOL Syrian Imam: “Hillary Clinton, That Whore, Gave Birth To ISIS From Her Filthy Womb”


AWESOMENESS:
Sheik Muhammad Ma’moun Rahma: After over three years of this world war, which was waged against us and against the entire Arab world, the tables have been turned overnight.  
The Mufti of Saudi Arabia shows up and tells the world and ISIS and Al-Qaeda are the sworn enemies of Islam and that it is permissible to kill them. 
Then their American master, Obama, shows up and tells the world that ISIS is a dangerous and criminal gang, and that the world must fight and kill it wherever it may be. 
Then Cameron admits that there are French [sic] terrorists fighting in Syria. America admits this too. 
Belgium admits this too.   
Didn’t Hillary Clinton, that whore, admit that she had given birth to ISIS from her filthy womb? Obama, what made you kill your spoilt daughter, ISIS?

In Case You’re Looking For Someone to Blame for ISIL


From Weaponsman:

Remember, we had the top ISIL leader under lock and key, until the seas stopped rising and the planet began to heal:
The leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS,) Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was formerly held by the U.S. military at Camp Bucca in southern Iraq from 2005 to his release in 2009.
Hmmm. The US Department of Justice wanted page for Abu Bakr doesn’t mention that, to steal a construction from the Man Who Would Be King, but wound up as Secretary of State: we were for al-Baghdadi before we were against him. But now we’re definitely against him, to the tune of ten million smackers’ reward.
We have always been at war with Eastasia, brother.
Note that we’re all that against him, like we were in the bad old days of Cowboy Bush. We’re not offering the reward for the head of this clown, FOB Fallujah, in a cooler with some dry ice. Somewhere, old KGB officer Vladimir Vladimirovich is shaking his head at American amateurishness, remembering how his service solved the problem of jihadi kidnappings of a random Russian in Lebanon. (Messy KGB wet-work applied to random jihadi leaders. Message received, jihad out. The Russian captive was released with an apology). No, we’re looking for the guy so that Covington and Burling can pocket millions in Gulf Arab jihad money, to tie the US courts up with him wink-nod “pro bono”.
Yet we had the guy, perfectly neutralized in a small, uncomfortable cell. Hmmm. What happened in early 2009 that led to mass releases of terrorists? We seem to recall some calamity or other that gave rise to this.
Why such a dangerous man was slated for release in 2009, or who made the decision is not known. The Telegraph offers that “one possible explanation is that he was one of thousands of suspected insurgents granted amnesty as the US began its draw down in Iraq.”
In 2010, shortly after his release, al-Baghdadi was announced as a new al-Qaeda leader. When bin Laden was killed in 2011, Baghdadi pledged to revenge his death “with 100 terrorist attacks across Iraq” – but with al Qaeda leaders dropping like flies in Pakistan and Afghanistan, no one took him seriously.
Exercise for the reader: How many Italian POWs from the Desert Campaign were ordered released after Italy sued for peace in 1943? (Hint: it’s the number of White House officials who attended the state funeral of MG Greene. But they sent three to the funeral of the wannabe cop killer who started the Ferguson riots).
How many Japanese POWs from Guadalcanal were let go because the war had moved on to Iwo Jima?
But just about everybody we had in the bag on 20 Jan 09 is back in the jihad business today (if they weren’t so incredibly unlucky as to get whacked in the interim).
The country’s in the very best of hands.