Bret Baier reporting that in July 2016 the FISA court turned down a request from the White House(?) to wiretap the Trump campaign and its officials as TOO BROAD. This was refined and then approved.
The information of this wiretap was PROVIDED to the White House on January 19th.
Baier states the wiretaps turned up NOTHING (which MIGHT be why the FBI went to Trump and told him they knew the NY Times story was “BULLSHIT”)
Make no mistake, to do this in the midst of a campaign, is POLICE STATE behavior and this is ABSOLUTELY Watergate level.
WATERGATE LEVEL.
This is something that DOES bear the requirement of a special prosecutor and I would suggest a civil liberties expert:
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
7 comments:
The Dersh would be good. He is one of the few Democrats with his integrity intact.
WTF?
Wow.
http://i.imgur.com/GE0tXCB.png
link to image of series of recent Trump Tweets, related to tapps
Note also: "The first meeting Jeff Sessions had with the Russian Amb was set up by the Obama Administration under education program for 100 Ambs..."
Why would the Obama Admin ever have had a reason to wiretap a Presidential candidate of the other party?!!?!!?!?!????
That is insane.
Because they thought they could get away with it? That is there MO. Look at how they conducted business in the Middle East. Everything done half-assed to see what sticks. If Trump plays this right, Obama and everyone associated with him is f*cked.
TLEP,
May your last sentence turn out to be true!
Um,
My comment should have been addressed to TDR. Damn the small font on this device.
Post a Comment