Thursday, November 26, 2015
Trump's "Hillary Cackling" Ad
The most amazing thing about this ad is HOW ON POINT IT IS.
Each one of these cackles was truly in response to a question on one of the subjects portrayed in the advertisement.
She really does respond like that.
She is insane, and the Democrats believe she is a reasonable choice to be President of the United States.
We live in interesting times.
84%, of Voters Characterize Immigration From The Middle East As ‘Dangerous’
Survey Results: A nationwide survey of 2016 likely general election voters conducted by McLaughlin & Associates for SecureAmericaNow.org finds that more than 4 out of 5 voters, 84%, would categorize immigration from the Middle East to the United States as “Dangerous.” The plurality, 49%, said “very dangerous,” with another 35% saying “somewhat dangerous.” Only 12%, said it was “not dangerous at all,” with the remaining 4%, saying they didn’t know. These numbers are strong across the board as even Democrats (75%) and Liberals (69%) view immigration from the Middle East as dangerous.
Former CIA Director: Obama Didn't Bomb ISIS Because GLOBAL WARMING!
Well, if that isn't a Rebuke to the terrorists, I don't know what is:
The Daily Caller reported: Former Deputy Director of the CIA Michael Morell suggested that Barack Obama didn’t order the bombing of ISIS’s oil transportation infrastructure until recently in part because he was concerned about environmental damage.
Morell also said the White House was concerned about destroying infrastructure that could be used by the Syrian people.
Appearing on PBS’s “Charlie Rose” on Tuesday, Rose pointed out that before the terrorist attacks in Paris, the U.S. had not bombed ISIS-controlled oil tankers.
Morell explained, “Prior to Paris, there seemed to be a judgment that … look, we don’t want to destroy these oil tankers because that’s infrastructure that’s going to be necessary to support the people when ISIS isn’t there anymore, and it’s going to create environmental damage.
And we didn’t go after oil wells — actually hitting oil wells that ISIS controls because we didn’t want to do environmental damage and we didn’t want to destroy that infrastructure, right.”
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
Fears of MAJOR Terror Attack After Hungary Uncovers Bomb Lab – Arrests Four Men with Explosives
Hungary finds car with bombs, uncovers bomb lab
https://t.co/OXJlOQtHFH
-via @inshorts pic.twitter.com/lYHhhvmJwJ
— Harsh Jhunjhunwala (@harsh2290) November 25, 2015
This all ought to work out just fine.
Fucking Treasonous Scumbag Obama Has Already Issued 680,000 Green Cards To Muslims In The Past Five Years
Fuck Obama:
President Obama’s open-door immigration policy is set to accept more immigrants from Muslim nations over the next five years than the entire population of Washington, D.C., according to federal documents.
Figures from the Department of Homeland Security show that the president has already issued 680,000 green cards to immigrants from Muslim nations over the past five years. Unless Congress changes his policy, that number will be repeated in the next five years.Obama is the Pharoah Ramses.
What If The Turkish Shooting Of Russian Fighter Jet Was Also To Protect President Obama?
Look At This, Erdie, I Can Get These Stupid Infidels
To Do Anything I Want Them To Do
The presumption within the controversy (as it is generally discussed by the media) is that CENTCOM bosses changed the intel to give the impression of success to please the White House. But what if that wasn’t the reason? russian fighter planeObama Racine
What if the BIGGER story is that CENTCOM officers actually gave the White House accurate negative outlook intelligence, but the White House itself was ideologically adverse to the content therein? Meaning the White House did not want to take action based on accurate intelligence, because the White House didn’t actually want to fight ISIS; they only wanted to promote the illusion of fighting ISIS.
What if the inept and inadequate response was not ineptitude or inadequacy, but rather an intentional and deliberate ploy to appear inept and inadequate. The faulty intelligence story then is used as an EXCUSE, to hide the real reasoning – plausible deniability.Wouldn’t an investigation into the claims of those providing the intelligence then be a risk to the White House?
FOUR DAYS AGO 11/21/15 – A Congressional task force is being created to investigate whether U.S. Central Command, headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base, manipulated intelligence.The chairmen of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the House Armed Services Committee and the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee “are creating a task force to investigate allegations of intel manipulation at CENTCOM,” said Jack Langer, spokesman for select committee Chairman U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, a Republican from California.CENTCOM received the request from Congress for information on intelligence assessments and, in coordination with the Department of Defense, “has responded accordingly,” said Air Force Col. Pat Ryder, a CENTCOM spokesman.Ryder said that he cannot comment on the information provided because of an ongoing investigation into allegations that CENTCOM altered intelligence reports to provide a rosier picture of the fight against the so-called Islamic State jihadi group.
Wouldn’t such a congressional investigation be considered a risk? Might such inquiry take the conversation in an entirely new direction and expose a hidden, albeit ideological, agenda?
Essentially, the scenario would be: the White House was provided accurate and specific intelligence of ISIS operations, movements, locations, actions and activities, and yet none of that information was every used to carry out the publicly stated objectives….….nothing ever done to destroy those ISIS operations, disrupt those activities, target those locations. Intentionally nothing done.
Two ideological NATO Allies, Turkey and U.S.A., who have leaders with ulterior motives in support of ISIS (aka. for all intents and purposes -politically and ideologically- the Muslim Brotherhood). President Obama essentially aiding his friend and Islamist BFF President Erdogan through “non action” against an entity benefiting the intents of Erdogan. But Obama has to keep up anti-ISIS appearances for domestic consumption.
What if…. say, two months ago, Jordan, via King Abdullah, and Egypt via Fattah el Sisi then frustratingly turned to Russia to discuss how this U.S. anti-ISIS effort is a false fight in media appearance only. Their specific two countries are suffering, and becoming more destabilized as the radicalization grows.What if…. President Obama views Abdullah and el-Sisi as inauthentic Arab leaders who exist only as a result of a centuries old euro-Colonialism. Ideologically illegitimate and unworthy of U.S. support under his leadership.What if…. an agreement is reached between Putin, Abdullah and el-Sisi, and then a few weeks later – all of a sudden along comes an actual military entity (Russia) who DOES TAKE ACTION based in large part on the same intelligence the White House was ignoring.Now, with Russia actually attacking the Islamic State, ISIS is actually and specifically being targeted. Real loses, not the New York Times kind of media losses – but actual, military and economic losses.GO READ THE WHOLE THING.
Listen to what Putin has to say:
-----
AND THEN THERE'S THIS:
Russia bombards Syrian rebels near site of downed Russian jet
From Reuters:
YAYLADAGI, Turkey (Reuters) - Russian forces launched a heavy bombardment against insurgent-held areas in Syria's Latakia province on Wednesday, near where a Russian warplane had been shot down by Turkey the day before, rebels and a monitoring group said.
At least 12 air strikes hit Latakia's northern countryside as pro-government forces clashed with fighters from al Qaeda's Nusra Front and Turkmen insurgents in the Jabal Akrad and Jabal Turkman areas, the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.
A Turkmen commander said missiles fired from Russian warships in the Mediterranean were also hitting the area, as well as heavy artillery shelling. Hassan Haj Ali, the head of Liwa Suqour al-Jabal, a rebel group operating in western Syria, also said there were fierce battles in the area, with Russian aircraft supporting pro-government forces.
Turkey on Tuesday shot down a Russian warplane that it said had entered Turkish airspace, something denied by Moscow.
BY THE NUMBERS: THE UNTOLD STORY OF MUSLIM OPINIONS AND DEMOGRAPHICS
THE UNTOLD STORY OF MUSLIM OPINIONS AND DEMOGRAPHICS
And here's a video about the Islamic perspective:
And here's a video about the Islamic perspective:
Landlord who provided a hideout to Paris jihadis is swept to court before dawn by heavily-armed police where he is expected to be the first person charged with helping them
Yet Another Moderate Muslim
Caught Up In The "Wave of Islamophobia"
The landlord who provided a hideout for the Paris massacre gang was today expected to become the first person based in the French capital to be charged with helping them.Jawad Bendaoud, himself a convicted killer, was appearing before an anti-terrorism judge in a court surrounded by machine-gun carrying police.It came as forensics experts continued to examine a suicide bomber’s explosive belt found dumped in the city.
What the Fuck Is Going On With Turkey Shooting Down a Russian Warplane?
By the way, the chick reporter in this video is HOT HOT HOT! (Her name is even Chickayan which is just a really good name for a Hot Chick like her.)
The problem with choosing a horse in the race over there in Syria is, we get ourselves into bad situations like this, where we are in alliance with Turkey who, apparently, wants to throw the "moderate Syrian opposition" to the wind.
This concept of "moderate Syrian opposition' is EXTREMELY DUBIOUS to me.
And yet, here we are in league with Turkey AND the Moderate Syrian Opposition, while Russia is clearly anti-ISIS (which means theoretically they are on our side) as well as standing against the "moderate Syrian opposition".
And so, what are we supposed to do; oppose Russia because they are going after "moderate Syrians"?
WTF?
Anyway, for several weeks now, I have noticed that some Conservative commentators claim Russia is attacking ISIS, while some claim Russia is not attacking ISIS, but instead that Russia is attack our friends in the region.
Who are these Moderate Syrian Rebels?
Anyone know?
UPDATE -
Here's a comment which was emailed to me:
The problem with choosing a horse in the race over there in Syria is, we get ourselves into bad situations like this, where we are in alliance with Turkey who, apparently, wants to throw the "moderate Syrian opposition" to the wind.
This concept of "moderate Syrian opposition' is EXTREMELY DUBIOUS to me.
And yet, here we are in league with Turkey AND the Moderate Syrian Opposition, while Russia is clearly anti-ISIS (which means theoretically they are on our side) as well as standing against the "moderate Syrian opposition".
And so, what are we supposed to do; oppose Russia because they are going after "moderate Syrians"?
WTF?
Anyway, for several weeks now, I have noticed that some Conservative commentators claim Russia is attacking ISIS, while some claim Russia is not attacking ISIS, but instead that Russia is attack our friends in the region.
Who are these Moderate Syrian Rebels?
Anyone know?
UPDATE -
Here's a comment which was emailed to me:
I remember early on in the Syrian conflict seeing images of crated arsenals in the hands of jihad rebels. The crates, had English lettering. In my mind the stories we have access to are scripted for public consumption. The real stories can be hard to ferret out.
I remember the Elizabeth O'Bagy media blitz - a woman who was a darling and "expert" on Syria until it was found out that she had falsified her CV. After her think tank fired her for fraud, Senator McCain hired her as a staffer. So a woman who is unethical is rewarded for a script which is compliant to the Administration line. What we are reading perhaps has a kernel of truth. What the greater truth is, only a few people know.
So who are the moderate rebels? I haven't a clue.
Obama's Rebuke to Jihadists: Climate Change Summit
By his logic, if we bombard the Jihadists with Climate Change Summit after Climate Change - disproportionate force - we will contain ISIS, or dismantle them, or something ...
Of course, Obama's not concerned with "America winning" or any such useless notion.
Fuck Obama. Fuck him in the ass.
Video of Pres. Obama saying that the climate conference in Paris will be a "powerful rebuke" to the terrorists pic.twitter.com/wzRYGGQot8
— Mike Ciandella Ù† (@MikeCiandella) November 24, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)