All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
TENEO IS FOCUSED ON WORKING EXCLUSIVELY WITH THE CEOS AND LEADERS OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST AND MOST COMPLEX COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS.
Leveraging the deep global relationships, experience and intellectual capabilities across all 12 of our operating divisions, we sit at the center of information and networks, offering unparalleled execution to capture opportunities and solve complex problems.
One reason Hillary Clinton lost the 2008 primary was the liberal distaste for the corporatism, cronyism, K Street coziness, and flat-out corruption that defined Bill Clinton’s presidency and Hillary Clinton’s Senate tenure. All of that unsavory blending of political clout and personal wealth is still going on in Clinton world, and the crux is a consulting firm called Teneo. Two recent New York Times pieces nicely captured it. The Clinton Foundation, for instance, overlaps significantly with Teneo, the corporate consultancy where Bill Clinton and many friends of bill make lots of money. The Times reports on: Teneo worked on retainer, charging monthly fees as high as $250,000, according to current and former clients. The firm recruited clients who were also Clinton Foundation donors, while Mr. Band and Mr. Kelly encouraged others to become new foundation donors. Its marketing materials highlighted Mr. Band’s relationship with Mr. Clinton and the Clinton Global Initiative, where Mr. Band sat on the board of directors through 2011 and remains an adviser. Some Clinton aides and foundation employees began to wonder where the foundation ended and Teneo began.
Those worries intensified after the collapse of MF Global, the international brokerage firm led by Jon S. Corzine, a former governor of New Jersey, in the fall of 2011. The firm had been among Teneo’s earliest clients, and its collapse over bad European investments — while paying $125,000 a month for the firm’s public relations and financial advice — drew Teneo and the Clintons unwanted publicity.
Interestingly, the Clinton Foundation is now the de facto Hillary 2016 campaign.
Then there’s Huma Abedin, wife to Anthony Weiner and right-hand-woman to Hillary.
Ms. Abedin, 37, a confidante of Mrs. Clinton’s, was made a “special government employee” in June 2012. That allowed her to continue her employment at State but also work for Teneo, a consulting firm, founded in part by a former aide to President Bill Clinton, that has a number of corporate clients, including Coca-Cola. In addition, Ms. Abedin worked privately for the Clinton Foundation and for Mrs. Clinton personally.
The lie that Barack Obama was not born in the US has been fuelled by fringe Republicans — but supporters of Hillary Clinton, now Mr Obama’s Secretary of State, are largely to blame for starting it.
False rumours about Mr Obama’s background first surfaced in 2004, in Illinois, where he was a state senator. Andy Martin, a perennial local candidate and litigant, claimed Mr Obama was secretly Muslim.
Related theories — including that he was radicalised in a “madrassa” in Indonesia — developed after Mr Obama entered the national stage with a speech to the Democratic National Convention later that year.
In 2005, Mr Obama went to Washington as the junior US senator for Illinois.
The rumours about him persisted, but seemingly failed to take hold among political insiders and voters alike.
It was not until April 2008, at the height of the intensely bitter Democratic presidential primary process, that the touch paper was properly lit.
An anonymous email circulated by supporters of Mrs Clinton, Mr Obama’s main rival for the party’s nomination, thrust a new allegation into the national spotlight — that he had not been born in Hawaii.
This is what it said:
“Barack Obama’s mother was living in Kenya with his Arab-African father late in her pregnancy,” it said. “She was not allowed to travel by plane then, so Barack Obama was born there and his mother then took him to Hawaii to register his birth.”
That's over criticism of his policy. Imagine how Obama must have felt about Hillary's questioning of the identity as an American, an attack that goes to the very core of his being?
How did this woman get to be Secretary of State under Obama?
Ponder that for a moment?
Could it be Hillary actually had something on Obama with this Birth Certificate thing?
Could it be that Obama actually has something equally damaging on Hillary, say, like Bill Clinton's Pedophile Island vacations (which also conveniently came out recently)?
Can one reasonably imagine any other kind of working arrangement between these two vindictive monomaniacs other than a truce by Mutually Assured Destruction?
Or do you think it is reasonable to say that Obama decided to bury the hatchet with his bitter nemesis, the woman who was willing to question, not only his fitness for office, but his fitness to even call himself an American in the first place?
So yeah, I think it is possible Obama said, "Ok, Hillary, I'll give you what you want, a position of prestige within my Administration that you can use as a springboard towards your election to POTUS in 2016. But you have to play ball with me. You have to pursue my Foreign Policy agenda, and in order to accomplish that agenda, you have to do your job the way I tell you to do your job."
And what was/is Obama's Foreign Policy agenda?
Well, what was Obama's first overseas speech?
It was called "A New Beginning", otherwise known as the Cairo Speech, in which Obama stated:'
I’m proud to carry with me the goodwill of the American people, and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: Assalaamu alaykum (Applause.)
I’ve come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition.
Is it crazy to suggest that Obama's primary Foreign Policy goals as President have revolved around creating a bond between America and the Islamic world?
If that is not reasonable, then what is his main Foreign Policy objective?
Well, let's assume I am correct for a minute. We know that Americans do not trust the Islamic world, and why should we? How are we to find common values with nations who espouse Sharia law, who put apostates and gays to death? Who wrap women up in the chains of the Burqa? Who scream for the death of our nation at the drop of a pin?
So how is a President to achieve such a Foreign Policy objective, such a major realignment of the world order, when it goes contrary to the will of the people?
The answer is, he'd have to run a Black Ops Foreign Policy team. He'd have to go dark. He'd have to create a means of back channel communications that would allow him to stay in constant communication with the major players of the Islamic world at all times?
Private Servers anyone?
And if you're Obama, and you're putting Hillary in charge of such an initiative, well, what is Hillary's major asset? Has she ever done Foreign Policy before? No. Does she know the key players that Obama is reaching out to? Iran's Mullahs? The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt? The leaders of Hamas?
Daughter of Saleha Mahmood Abedin, a pro-Sharia sociologist with ties to numerous Islamist organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood
Longtime assistant to Hillary Clinton
Wife of former congressman Anthony Weiner
Longtime former employee of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, which shares the Muslim Brotherhood's goal of establishing Islamic supremacy and Sharia Law worldwide
Her father, Syed Abedin (1928-1993), was an Indian-born scholar who had worked as a visiting professor at Saudi Arabia's King Abdulaziz University in the early Seventies.
Huma's mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia Law. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood's division for women),
Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief. This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
I believe that, in negotiating their MAD Truce, Obama and Hillary struck upon a working relationship that included Huma Abedin as Hillary's advisor and liaison to the world of the Muslim Brotherhood, and Valerie Jarrett, as Hillary's director for the Iran Initiative.
I think Obama sees the Muslim Brotherhood as being the natural heirs to the Sunni Throne, and the Mullahs of Iran as the natural heirs to the Shia Throne.
I think Obama is an anti-Colonialist, as Dinesh D'Souza theorizes. But he is not merely ANTI-Colonialist. He is sophisticated enough to be for something as well. That is, he is a National Socialist. Or, perhaps better put, he is an Ethnic Nationalist, a person who believes only the indigenous people of a country ought have a say in the national political structure.
I think Obama's vision for the world involves weakening the West (which he sees as a force of oppression and imperialism, militarily, economically, and commercially), while restoring the nation's the West has, to his mind, plundered, to the rule of their natural heirs.
I believe Obama made it clear in the title of his first autobiography that he is pursuing the dream of his father. And what were those dreams?
Barack Obama, Sr. worked under Kenya's elected President Tom Mboya. Tom Mboya was a Pan-Africanist. He believed in Africa for African people, but he did not narrowly define who the African people were. Barack Obama Sr. disagreements with Tom Mboya revolved around the concept of Pan-Africanism vs. what Barack Obama, Sr. saw as a Kenyan Socialism, or National Socialism.
It is true that in most African societies the individual had sole right as to the use of land and proceeds from it. He did, however, own it only as a trustee to the clan, tribe or society. He could give it on loan to someone outside the tribe to use, but he had no right to sell it outside the tribe .. How then can there be a conflict of opinion on communal ownership?
Here he is on the Nationalization of Private Enterprise:
There
is a statement made on nationalization [in Sessional Paper No. 10].
True there are cases in which nationalization is bad, but there are,
likewise, quite a few benefits to be derived from it. On this subject
I would like to refer the authors to Prof. Bronferbrenner’s
[sic] work on the “Appeals for confiscation in Economic Development”*
[sic — the referenced article is titled “The Appeal of Confiscation in Economic
Development”]. Nationalization should not be looked at only in terms
of profitability alone, but also, or even more, on the benefit to
society that such services render and on its importance in terms of
public interest ..
And what is that "public interest"? It is the seizing of assets owned by those outside the tribe:
There is also a statement that nationalization will apply to African enterprise. How can we talk of nationalizing African enterprise when such enterprises do not exit?
If we are going to nationalize, we are going to nationalize what exists and is worth nationalizing. But these are European and Asian enterprises.
One need not be a Kenyan to note that nearly all commercial enterprises from small shops in River Road to big shops in Government Road and that industries in the Industrial Areas of Nairobi are mostly owned by Asians and Europeans.
One need not be a Kenyan to note that when one goes to a good restraurant he mostly finds Asians and Europeans, nor has he to be a Kenyan to see that the majority of cars running in Kenya are run by Asians and Europeans.
How then can we say that we are going to to be indiscriminate in rectifying these imbalances? We have to give the African his place in his own country and we have to give him this economic power if he is going to develop.
And this means seizing the assets of outsiders, the means of production owned by those who are not "folk" to the country.
Does this sound familiar?
Kristalnacht, anyone?
So, back to the point:
Barack Obama is perpetuating the Dreams of His Father.
It is important to understand this if you want to understand his Islamic world policy.
Remember, Obama was heavily instrumental in kicking Mubarak out of power. Obama then helped the Muslim Brotherhood ascend to power, and when they did, he invested heavily in them in Foreign Aid, up to and including military weapons.
At the time, this looked like an investment in Arab Democracy. But my opinion is, to Obama, this was an investment, not in Arab Democracy, but in Islamic Democracy.
(I will explain momentarily.)
Then the people decided they had had enough of the Muslim Brotherhood's pushing of a Sharia agenda. The people agitated for the Muslm Brotherhood to leave.
Did Obama support the will of the people in excising the Muslim Brotherhood?
No, he didn't.
So why was Obama for Arab Democracy in one case, and not in the next?
Why would Obama support Hamas when they were elected once and for all? Is that Democracy? Could we have expected the Muslim Brotherhood to have behaved any differently? Would it have been reasonable to expect that the Muslim Brotherhood ever would have relinquished power voluntarily? Has any Islamist government ever relinquished power voluntarily? Ever?
No.
But it is the Islamist governments Obama has supported.
When, in 2009, the people of Iran stood up and attempted to rock the streets so hard as to unseat the Mullahs, did Obama stand behind the will of the people to unseat the Islamist government?
No.
Barack Obama does not stand for unseating any Islamist government.
Barack Obama DOES stand for Democratic elections that put an Islamist government in power.
Barack Obama does not stand for the orderly transition of power from an Islamist government to another duly elected government of a predominantly Muslim Arab population.
Barack Obama is, therefore, not an Arabist. He is a Muslim sympathizer, or perhaps, better said, an Islamist sympathizer. He does not believe in Arab Democracy. He believe in Islamist Democracy.
And, by his actions and words, we can see he supports the all-but-permanent installation of Islamist governments once elected.
This is because Barack Obama believes Islamist governments embody the will of the volk; the people of the Arab nations.
The Muslim Brotherhood to the Sunni, the Mullahs to the Shia.
It is not out of weakness that Obama has delegated the fight against ISIS in Iraq to the Mullahs of Iran? Obama sees Iraq as a Shia counterbalance to the Sunni world.
I believe Obama thinks of a stable Middle East as a Middle East where the Sunnis and the Shias both have their own Kingdoms, which can then work out a rapprochement only when the Will of the People are represented by a leader which embodies the sprit of the folk; a Caliphate.
Obama, in essence, is pursuing, not merely an anti-colonialist initiative in the Middle East, but a fully-formed National Socialist vision, complete with a mythological dimension born of Islam.
And, to dovetail back to the beginning, that is what the Private Email Servers are about. Obama can not allow the people of the United States know what is this monomaniacal vision he pursues.
We are the crew, he is Ahab. We will not truly understand the voyage we find ourselves upon, until we are ringed by leviathans, and the White Whale is bearing down on us.
To summarize: according to DomainTools.com, the domain clintonemail.com has been hosted by Confluence Networks since 12/22/2011, more than three years. Confluence Networks, based out of the British Virgin Islands, has only existed as a domain (confluence-networks.com) since April 2011, appears to be closely related to a Dubai-based media advertising firm, and has always had its domain name managed by PrivacyProtect.org, a registration privacy firm that lists addresses out of Luxembourg and Australia, but gives a phone number apparently out of Denmark, and that shows up repeatedly in connection with fraud, scam, and spam-related domains.
No, no questions or issues there.
UPDATES --- You think by any chance Huma would use the same E Mail server? My guess is negotiations over what I will call "The Huma Initiative" were the reason for this Private Server.
-----
Tie this in with the essays "The Betrayal Papers" over at Gates of Vienna...RICO and TREASON are the first words that come to mind...unfathonable treason which Jekyll Islanders couldn't achieve alone, may actually succeed with Muslim Brotherhood tactics.
Haaretz's Barak Ravid tweeted this photo of Hillary Clinton arriving at the Regency Hotel in New York for her Thursday meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu. In a tweeted response, Laura Rozen identified the other people in the picture. That's Hillary in the front.
The lady to her left (our right) in the blue pantsuit and pink wrap is Wendy Sherman, the United States' Iranian negotiator. The tall, thin guy behind her is policy planning chief Jake Sullivan. And the woman to Sullivan's right (our left) with the brown shirt, white necklace and off white pants is Hillary's administrative aide Muslim Brotherhood representative Huma Abedin.
What the heck is Huma doing there? Taking notes? For whom?
Is there anyone in this 'group' that is pro-Israel?
"The Plot Thickens" - Explosive Exclusive: The Abedin “Affairs” with Al Saud(Shoebat).The one entity left-wing media outlets are twisting themselves into pretzels to avoid explaining is the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA). This is the one organization that is covered with Huma Abedin’s fingerprints; she served as Assistant Editor for at least 12 years.
What we bring to you today is the force behind the IMMA and make no mistake; it is a force. It is the House of Saud. The Royal family gave birth to the IMMA and has nurtured it to further one sole purpose – to turn Muslim minority nations into Muslim majority nations. This document is historic; it is explosive; and it will unequivocally demonstrate that when the West seeks to find the source of radical Islamic fundamentalism, it need look no further than where its heart is – Saudi Arabia.
If you’re the same person after reading this, you should pinch yourself because you may still be asleep.
Huma Abedin's mother, Saleha Abedin Edited and Translated a book titled Women in Islam: A Discourse in Rights and Obligations, which was published by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) in 1999.
“It is unlawful to kill a Muslim except under three conditions. The Prophet (s) said: “The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshiped but Allah and that I am His Messenger, cannot be shed except in three cases: In retaliation for murder, a married person who commits adultery and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims.”
So, you might say to me, "Who cares, Pastorius? That's Huma Abedin's mother, not Huma herself."
Yes, but, Huma Abedin also sat as an Editor for the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, from 1998 to 2006.
In other words, Huma Abedin was an editor for the Institute during the exact time period that the Institute published the above book with the above quote.
Would you sit as an Editor for a publisher material calling for the death of apostates?
Huma did. And she did so while she was working as Hilary Clinton's assistant.
Yesterday, we commented on the news that President Barack Obama defended Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's closest adviser, Huma Abedin, at the White House Iftar dinner on August 10th.
What we didn't know is that Huma was seated next to the President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Mohamed Magid. The two seemed to be engaged in some friendly conversation and quite comfortable with one another. This is the same ISNA that was not only listed as a Muslim Brotherhood front group that seeks the overthrow of the U.S. Government from within, but also an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial. A 1991 document, penned by a Muslim Brotherhood leader identified the ISNA as a member group.
Here is the exact quote from that document that is perhaps the most alarming:
The Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.
In this photo, Huma is at the far left (resting hand under her chin) and Magid is the man she's talking to on the right.
The U.K. Daily Mail has the video from which the screen shot above was taken. CLICK HERE to view the video. Footage of guests begins at the 1:24 mark.
In light of the firestorm surrounding the issue of Huma's background...
Why would the White House have her seated next to the leader of a group that is part of the concerns raised by Reps. Bachmann, Gohmert, Franks, Westmoreland, and Rooney?
Why would the president of a Muslim Brotherhood group in America be invited to the White House (responding that it's been going on for years is no excuse)?
How well does Huma know Magid?
Does Huma know that Magid leads a Muslim Brotherhood group?
We have entered some extremely surreal territory.
Magid was, in fact, named in one of the letters sent by Bachmann, et. al. to various Inspectors General. In particular, the letter sent to the Acting IG for the Department of Defense said, in part, the following:
...the Defense Department - among other federal agencies - has used a liaison with the Muslim-American community named Mohamed Magid. Imam Magid is the president of the largest Muslim Brotherhood front in America, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). In this regard, we note that the "Supreme Guid" of the international Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammed Badie, in September 2010, openly called for jihad by all "the Arab and Muslim peoples" against the United States.
As recently as February 2012, Department officials met with Imam Magid to apologize for the inadvertent burning of Qurans in Afghanistan.
It's safe to say that former 'Blind Sheikh' prosecutor Andrew McCarthy is more than just a little alarmed about Huma Abedin's access to State secrets as Hillary Clinton's closest advisor. He explains the origins of the term 'Islamophobia' (Muslim Brotherhood) and points to Abedin's connections to al-Qaeda financier Abdullah Omar Nasseef.
Watch it all if you can but fast forward to the 29 minute mark if pressed. McCarthy actually says that Reps. Bachmann, Gohmert, Franks, Westmoreland, and Rooney have "understated" their case. McCarthy goes into great detail about Huma's involvement with the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) and Nasseef's role in other Brotherhood groups.
Yes, this is Huma. Yes, Huma Weiner. I don't see why that's so funny.
STOP CALLING HERE!!!
From Andrew McCarthy at PJM:
Senator John McCain’s claim that concerns about Huma Abedin are a smear based on “a few unspecified and unsubstantiated associations” proves more embarrassing by the day. In fact, to the extent it addressed Ms. Abedin, the letter sent to the State Department’s inspector general by five House conservatives actually understated the case.
The letter averred that Abedin “has three family members — her late father, her mother and her brother — connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.” It turns out, however, that Abedin herself is directly connected to Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure involved in the financing of al-Qaeda.
Abedin worked for a number of years at the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs as assistant editor of its journal. The IMMA was founded by Naseef, who remained active in it for decades, overlapping for several years with Abedin. Naseef was also secretary general of the Muslim World League in Saudi Arabia, perhaps the most significant Muslim Brotherhood organization in the world. In that connection, he founded the Rabita Trust, which is formally designated as a foreign terrorist organization under American law due to its support of al-Qaeda.
You ought to be able to stop right there.
A person is not required to have done anything wrong to be denied a high-ranking government position, or more immediately, the security clearance allowing access to classified information that is necessary to function in such a job. There simply need be associations, allegiances, or interests that establish a potential conflict of interest.
Government jobs and access to the nation’s secrets are privileges, not rights. That is why the potential conflict needn’t stem from one’s own associations with hostile foreign countries, organizations, or persons. Vicarious associations, such as one’s parents’ connections to troublesome persons and organizations, are sufficient to create a potential conflict.
In this instance, however, before you even start probing the extensive, disturbing Brotherhood ties of her family members, Huma Abedin should have been ineligible for any significant government position based on her own personal and longstanding connection to Naseef’s organization.
Specifically, Ms. Abedeen was affiliated with the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, where she was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. The journal was the IMMA’s raison d’etre. Abedin held the position of assistant editor from 1996 through 2008 — from when she began working as an intern in the Clinton White House until shortly before she took her current position as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff.
