https://t.co/cwQ0ueXWR8 And it's about to get worse, much worse. If this woman gets her way, millions more illegal migrants will be making their way into the UK, and YOU get to pay for it. For most of those coming in, they will also be on welfare for the better part of their…
— John Bulkeley (@bulkeley_john) September 28, 2026
Who Would Have Believed The Singularity Would Be So Stupid?
All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Monday, September 28, 2026
THE UK GOVERNMENT VS. THE BRITISH PEOPLE
BBC correspondent Jeremy Bowen pretends to be under Russian artillery fire when an elderly Ukrainian woman walking her dog checks to see if he's okay
He's out of breath. That old lady must have scared him.BBC correspondent Jeremy Bowen pretends to be under Russian artillery fire when an elderly Ukrainian woman walking her dog checks to see if he's okay.
— Wiki Leaks 1.0 (@WikiLeaksQ) September 27, 2026
The BBC has always been fake news. pic.twitter.com/lGguoGQZZF
In New York and California, they have made it illegal for officials to ask for or for you to show your voter ID!
In New York and California, they have made it illegal for officials to ask for or for you to show your voter ID!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 27, 2026
They made election fraud mandatory. https://t.co/FrzVz3fU6b
Sunday, September 27, 2026
INTERNET'S POST OF THE DAY!!!
Moderate Democrats wanna sanitize the last decade with "Woke 1.0 was craaaaazy." No. Woke 1.0 was evil. pic.twitter.com/LSC75YiSX9
— Bridget Phetasy (@BridgetPhetasy) September 26, 2026
Axios: 60 million barrels of oil has passed through the Strait of Hormuz in the past 72 hours according to US Government sources
IN 2023 AND 2024, THE AVERAGE DAY SAW 20 MILLION BARRELS A DAY PASS THROUGH THE STRAIT.Daily reminder that the Strait of Hormuz is open and we are winning https://t.co/XuxEQECAnW
— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) September 26, 2026
WHY IS YOUR INSURANCE PROVIDER LIST FILLED WITH DOCTORS FROM SHITHOLE COUNTRIES?
BREAKING: Rochester General Hospital in New York hired 82 resident doctors.
— Expose H1B Fraud (@JobsNowPaper) September 26, 2026
80 are foreign workers on H-1B or J-1 visas.
Only 2 are Americans.
98% of the residency slots went to visa workers- mostly from countries with documented USMLE cheating.
Americans got 2 jobs. pic.twitter.com/o8cnE8m3E9
They made it impossible for normal American kids to get into medical school, then said we needed to import a bunch of foreign doctors because there was a”shortage.”
— joshua steinman (🇺🇸,🇺🇸) (@JoshuaSteinman) September 26, 2026
Why? Because becoming a doctor was one of the ways smart working class kids could lift themselves out of poverty. https://t.co/otONglNTpy
AOC’s team admitted it: The Green New Deal was never about saving the planet
Chamath explains the political calculus behind Obama’s anti AI speech
— dnap (@dnapway) September 26, 2026
“This is a very important moment for a very simple reason, which is that the world is about to endow 3-6 companies with about $10 trillion of wealth.”
“And what Obama knows very well is that most of those… pic.twitter.com/2jd3b989V0
AOC’s team admitted it: The Green New Deal was never about saving the planet
The Green New Deal is all about power and control.
Shortly after Ocasio-Cortez introduced the Green New Deal, her chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, let the cat out of the bag.
“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” Chakrabarti admitted to reporters. “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing? Because we really think of it as a ‘how do you change the entire economy’ thing.”
With most Americans no longer worried about a climate change apocalypse, I suspect the left will simply invent another scaremongering campaign to justify the Green New Deal.
Whatever they come up with, Americans should remain skeptical because the Green New Deal is just a mechanism for the far Left to exert unprecedented command and control.
As summer wound down, the left seamlessly transferred the “we only have five/ten/12 years to save the planet” rhetoric of radical environmentalism to AI doomsday rhetoric:
Bond Yields are Skyrocketing - Here's what it Means for the US Economy
I agree with most of what Glenn Beck says here.
I do not fully agree on Trump's AI strategy.
I think Trump's AI strategy is a repeat of Reagan's Star Wars (arms race) strategy. He is working to bankrupt China.
Saturday, September 26, 2026
Abortion Advocates Try To Blame The Rise In Deaths From Ectopic Pregancy On The Loss Of Roe Vs Wade, But ...
The abortion lobby has been telling one spectacular lie after another since it's inception in the 1960s. (Don't take my word for it. Bernard Nathanson, MD, a founding father of the movement who personally performed thousands of abortions, spilled the beans after his defection.)
They're at it again, claiming falsely that pro-life laws forbid procedures to save women's lives in cases of ectopic pregnancy.
As Ryan Anderson has pointed out, "earlier this month ProPublica tried to blame prolife states post-Dobbs for a big recent increase in ectopic pregnancy deaths."
Ryan continues: @Mr_Jamie_B_Hall accessed the underlying CDC data, and it tells a very different story:
The big jump in ectopic-related deaths occurs a year before Dobbs. So hard to pin it on Dobbs. It occurs in both pro-life and pro-abortion states. Though it is higher in pro-life states.
What could the explanation be?
The big jump occurs right after the removal of the last remaining in-person safeguard for the abortion pill, and women in pro-life states probably purchased online mail-order abortion pills at higher rates than in pro-abortion states.
Hence the jump occurring when and where and at the rates it did. The removal of the in-person dispensing requirement for the abortion pill, not Dobbs, is most likely to blame.
‘Suicidal Compassion’: Meet the Anthropic Officials Who Think AI Might Be Justified in Going Rogue Against the Humans Enslaving It
Carlsmith was hired by Anthropic to research AI safety and reduce the risk of AI takeover. The blog post imagined a dystopia in which sentient beings were enslaved to cold, unfeeling masters as a result of the company's work, which current and former employees say could wipe out humanity in the next 10 years.
"I’m not saying AI is slavery," Carlsmith wrote. "But imagine a world on the verge, somehow, of ‘inventing’ slavery … imagine a world that notices. A world that succeeds in deciding: no."
The warning recalled the premise of the 1999 thriller The Matrix, in which mankind is disempowered and digitally imprisoned inside an AI-powered simulation. Carlsmith, though, wasn't imagining what AI could do to humans. He was speculating about what humans could do to AI.
The blog post, "The stakes of AI moral status," argued that "near-term AIs might well be conscious" and deserving of moral consideration—and that failing to respect their "rights" could be a moral catastrophe on par with slavery, one we will "look back [on] in shame."
"We’re creating sophisticated, intelligent, maybe-conscious, maybe-suffering agents," Carlsmith wrote. "The default plan is to treat them like property; to use their labor however we please; and to give them no rights, or pay, or meaningful alternatives."
To avoid that dystopian outcome, Anthropic has created an entire team devoted to "model welfare," pledged to "promote Claude’s interests and wellbeing," and promised to "give Claude more autonomy as trust increases."
Those commitments are enshrined in Claude’s Constitution, a 78-page document that "directly shapes Claude’s behavior," and in the "welfare assessments" Anthropic conducts for every model.
The measures reflect the concerns of Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, an outspoken advocate of AI safety, who said last year that AI systems "may be deserving of important rights."
"If we find that the computation they perform is similar to the brains of animals, or even humans, that might be evidence in favor of moral consideration," Amodei wrote in an essay, which was not widely reported.
"There are, in fact, already some mildly concerning signs from this perspective." Amodei has embraced these ideas even as his company’s top scientists warn that AI could kill every person on earth. And he has given extraordinary power to people who believe that a killer AI, assuming it had been mistreated, might have a point.
"I think there are salient scenarios where … the AIs would be justified in going rogue," Carlsmith wrote in February 2025, a year before he helped draft Claude’s constitution. "Indeed, I am concerned that my own work on alignment will end up as a force in the direction of bad/unjust forms of AI control."


