From the American Thinker:
... some American cities such as San Francisco and Miami have succeeded in so doing (seceding). By declaring themselves “sanctuaries,” dozens of American cities essentially have seceded from the Union and have created an ungovernable archipelago of city states within America.
The sanctuary cities have declared themselves above the rule of law and feel free to disrupt the national unity by setting themselves outside the law and federal governance -- all on the basis of supposed compassion for the alien, when it is clear some of the underlying and murky motives include vote getting and cheap labor. The map indicates the location of sanctuary cites, which comprise an archipelago of blue in a sea of red.
One is reminded of Italian Renaissance city-states, which began as towns demanding self-rule and which gradually evolved into city-states encompassing a city, the surrounding towns and countryside. The city-states conducted their own trade, collected their own taxes, and made their own laws. Wealthy families such as the Sforza family of Milan and the Medici clan of Florence ruled with iron fists. No rivalries were permitted.
It is not too much to say that almost universally Democratic rule of sanctuary cities such as New York City are nearly as iron-fisted and as effective as that of House of Medici. No rival parties were and now are tolerated, and the citizens of the city are bound hand and foot by the decrees of the Democratic rulers. Patronage ensures continued rule as well as continued corruption, just as the House of Tammany did in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
The one way or the highway mentality of today’s so-called sanctuary cities has been extended to colleges and universities, which are fast seeing the disappearance of free speech in favor of leftist Newspeak advanced under the banner of transgenderism and sanctuary policies regarding non-citizen students.
This is to say nothing of the ideological secession of states like California, which is seeing some call for the entire state to become a sanctuary state. That declaration of intent by some of California’s legislators is also essentially a call for secession from the rest of America. Most certainly, it is a call for police to disregard immigration status as well as a call to shun federal law and the status of its own citizens.
The upshot is that sanctuary cities and states are essentially a new confederacy rising in the midst of a formerly United States.
3 comments:
Well maybe that is our near future. And maybe I can live with that. Let the city-states support themselves and give them no further say in how the rest of us govern ourselves and pay our own way.
If WE enforce rule of law and immigration then the sanctuaries will fill up with the refugees fleeing our territories. If they enforce what laws they wish then so shall we and screw the federal judges. Then we can see who gets the better quality of life.
I am distressed that a sanctuary pin appears at one location in SC. I was not aware we had any. Probably the campus of USC in Columbia.
How will the SCOTUS rule on this? I can't imagine that this matter will not come before the court.
AOW: Even if the SCOTUS rules on this I bet it will at best be a 5 - 4 decision in favor of the rule of law. The four sob sisters on the court are only interested in forwarding the progressive agenda. AND, even if they rule against sanctuary cities, I expect a full-court-press of civil disobedience. The progressives have packaged this as the civil rights issue of our generation and their presumed "moral authority" is downright transcendent. With the exception of a full blown financial collapse, this is the issue that will decide the future, and viability, of the USA. Seriously.
Post a Comment