Tuesday, November 05, 2013

Why America Will Soon Become The #1 Oil-Producing Nation In The World


From the Wall Street Journal:


Over the past five years of business history, two events have shocked and transformed the nation. In 2007 and 2008, the housing market crumbled and the financial system collapsed, causing trillions of dollars of losses. Around the same time, a few little-known wildcatters began pumping meaningful amounts of oil and gas from U.S. shale formations. A country that once was running out of energy now is on track to become the world's leading producer.
What's most surprising about both events is how few experts saw them coming—and that a group of unlikely outsiders somehow did. Federal Reserve chairmen Alan Greenspanand Ben Bernanke failed to foresee the financial meltdown. Top banking executives were stunned, and leading investors such as Bill Gross, Jim Chanos and George Soros didn't fully anticipate the downturn.
Wall Street talks up the importance of being contrarian. But in 2007, most traders subscribed to the mantra that the Fed wouldn't let housing crumble or that the boom would continue, while others couldn't find a good way to short subprime mortgages. They left it for the amateurs to figure out.
Less well known, but no less dramatic, is the story of America's energy transformation, which took the industry's giants almost completely by surprise. In the early 1990s, an ambitious Chevron CVX -0.42% executive named Ray Galvin started a group to drill compressed, challenging formations of shale in the U.S. His team was mocked and undermined by dubious colleagues. Eventually, Chevron pulled the plug on the effort and shifted its resources abroad.
Exxon Mobil XOM +1.04% also failed to focus on this rock—even though its corporate headquarters in Irving, Texas, were directly above a huge shale formation that eventually would flow with gas. Later, it would pay $31 billion to buy a smaller shale pioneer.
"I would be less than honest if I were to say to you [that] we saw it all coming, because we did not, quite frankly," Rex Tillerson, Exxon Mobil's chairman and CEO said last year in an interview at the Council on Foreign Relations.
In 2003, Alan Greenspan warned that the nation's gas fields were running dry and urged Congress to back costly facilities to import gas. Famed investors Warren Buffett andHenry Kravis invested in a record-setting utility-company buyout in 2007, wagering that a dearth of U.S. natural gas would send prices higher. Instead, the U.S. has so much cheap natural gas today that it is set to export it. The country is also pumping 7.9 million barrels of oil a day, up more than 50% since 2006 and the most in nearly 25 years.
The resurgence in U.S. energy came from a group of brash wildcatters who discovered techniques to hydraulically fracture—or frack—and horizontally drill shale and other rock. Many of these men operated on the fringes of the oil industry, some without college degrees or much background in drilling, geology or engineering.
In the late 1990s, George Mitchell, the son of a Greek goatherder, ran a midsize Houston-based company with shrinking natural-gas production. His stock price was falling, the industry was on its back, the 79-year-old had been diagnosed with cancer and his wife was in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. In almost two decades of trying, his men had not been able to coax enough natural gas from Mitchell Energy's DVN -0.47% Texas shale fields. But in 1998, one of Mr. Mitchell's engineers finally figured out how to properly fracture shale, stunning colleagues and larger competitors while launching the American energy revolution.
Harold Hamm grew up dirt-poor in a tiny town in Oklahoma. He began school around Christmas-time each year, once it became too cold to pick cotton, and he started his career raking out oil tanks. Over the past six years, Mr. Hamm and his company have discovered so much oil in North Dakota that he is now worth $14 billion. 
Aubrey McClendon and Tom Ward of Oklahoma were land-leasing specialists; they managed to build the nation's second-largest gas producer by leading the charge into shale fields. Charif Souki, a Lebanese immigrant and former restaurateur who knew more about fajitas than fracking, today runs Cheniere EnergyLNG +0.86% a Houston-based company that is on track to become the first to export gas from the contiguous U.S.
Bucking conventional wisdom is always risky, and many would-be mavericks in finance and the energy industry have failed. But corporate caution and complacency have their costs too, and today's emphasis on short-term performance means that executives are even less likely to take long-term risks, to anticipate the unexpected. For the next great business revolution, it would be smart to bet once again on stubborn, flamboyant dreamers.

Obamacare Might Not Cover Your Preexisting Condition - Just when you think you’ve heard it all

From Forbes, by Fox..it’s utterly incredible
By Robert Book, Contributor to Forbes.com
How many times have we heard, over the last three and a half years, that one of the primary and most popular features of Obamacare is that no one could be denied coverage for a preexisting condition? It turns out that this is just another one of the false claims used to sell the public on a health care reform that seems to move every aspect of health care in the wrong direction.
The Affordable Care Act does indeed specify, in Section 1201, that “a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage may not impose any preexisting condition exclusion with respect to such plan or coverage.” In other words, a health plan cannot deny enrollment, or the plan’s benefits, to someone based on that person’s preexisting.
However, that is not the same as saying that a plan has to include coverage for any particular preexisting condition, and it certainly does not mean a plan has to include coverage for ongoing treatment that a patient started before obtain coverage in an exchange plan on January 1, 2014.
Key to understanding this distinction is that having “health coverage” is not the same as actually obtaining “health care.” The insurance plan has to take anyone who wants to enroll, regardless of their health status or health history – but they don’t have to provide the same treatments, the same doctors, or the same medications that a patient has been receiving.
Last year I could have joined my wife’s cadillac plan as an individual for just a tad less than $1,000/month. BUT… any appt, treatment or Rx for my heart would have to be self pay for 12 months. Now I can do the same thing for $3700 - 6000/month?
Awesome
Apparently, while I cannot be turned away (as indeed I could not, here in Maine BEFORE), that’s not the same as coverage of what ails you. Broken arm, but not what you are sick with.
Is another basic premise of Ocare another piece of bologna?
Do the Ocare team know the answer?
What’s the over/under on that?

Today In Obama's America


ObamaCare website hands out personal information like Halloween candy 

HOLDER: We still might prosecute George Zimmerman

Obama denies health care comments...

Video recordings show him saying them -- at least 29 times!


LOWRY: The Speech He Never Gave...

FOURNIER: Lying About Lies...

OBAMASCARCE: DOCTOR SHORTAGE NEXT CRISIS...

Dem Senator's son has insurance cancelled...

Obamacare forces school district to consider substitute teachers...



Obama Admin Awards More Contracts To Company That Built Healthcare.gov


Obama Admin Gave Itself Waiver From Doing Security Tests On Healthcare.gov, Despite “High Risk”


Wow: Obama Administration Rules Obamacare Exchange Is Not A Federal Program…


The REAL miscalculation

When Barack Obama said Benghazi was because of an anti Muslim movie, it angered a few, but affected almost no one.
When Eric Holder and Barack Obama ran a gun running operation for god knows whatever reason they convinced themselves was of value, it angered a few, but affected almost no one.
When Obama’s justice dep’t. refused to prosecute a clear incident of voter intimidation, it angered a few but affected almost no one.
When Obama miscalculated the entire reason for and effect of the Arab Spring, it enraged a few but really affected us in the USA, very little.
When Obama successfully maneuvered the republicans into the blame for the shutdown it angered them, but it did not exactly send millions of Americans into the streets.
Each of these incidents and many more, since they really had personal impact for Americans at very low levels, but higher theoretical and principle quotients, were susceptible to political-speak, Ministry of Truth parsing dynamics, and press bias.
But now, NOW.. out of the progressive ideological principles, comes Obamacare: an idea which will impact EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN by REQUIRING EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN to PERSONALLY PAY MONEY out of the normal flow of their lives. 
And Americans are now noticing the promises are not just not being delivered upon, but MAY BE bologna.
But Obama and his crew are practiced only with  political-speak, Ministry of Truth parsing dynamics, and press bias. They do not do things like this in the REAL WORLD. They exempted themselves and congress and the SCOTUS system from the REAL WORLD and now they do not understand what is happening to them.
And we have not YET hit the point at which most of the Americans who will need to press [PAY NOW] have examined and looked, and shopped and found themselves at that point.
And then ….
And past that point comes the end of the one year delay in corporate mandated insurance, which will undergo a similar process to what we are seeing in the individual market.
The Obama team has TOTALLY miscalculated. They thought that implementing a system which affects the every day life, and everyday wallet calculations of Americans, and then this program’s mistakes (let alone catastrophe) was no different from Benghazi, and would be susceptible to the same excuse processes.
GOOD LUCK

Data.healthcare.gov views of Market Premium Estimated Rates TODAY, 11-5?

image

Demagogue In Action


A tone of desperation in his voice?

An expression of insanity in his eyes?

You decide as you watch and listen to this brief excerpt from Obama's November 3, 2013 speech in Northern Virginia:


Today is the gubernatorial election in Virginia (Cuccinelli, Republican, vs. McAuliffe, Democrat).

In 2009, Obama endorsed the Democratic Party candidate for governor here in Virginia. The result: a GOP sweep.

Today we'll find out if history repeats itself in the Commonwealth.

Meanwhile: Democratic Robo-Calls Claim Cuccinelli Supports Obamacare, Abortion.

UK: 95% of the British public feel the EDL have a view that deserves to be heard

Three killed as knife-wielding man hijacks a bus in Norway

From Vlad:
Man who murdered three Norwegians on a bus is flown safely to a Norwegian hospital to treat wounds “he sustained during the attack”. Reports are he was South Sudanese while Debka reports he was Palestinian. I would bet on Sudan. It is also interesting that he murdered everyone on that bus.

Nice Guys

They're so fucking nice.

There have been a lot of shootings in the news recently. Here's a righteous one, from one of the rougher sections of my hometown this afternoon.

Reading Eagle:

Robbers of Reading store shot dead, police say

Two masked men who allegedly robbed a Reading convenience store at gunpoint were shot dead on the sidewalk by an armed man who stumbled upon the scene Monday, police said.

Police said the two suspects, who have not yet been identified, entered Krick's Korner at Ninth and Exeter streets about 2 p.m., pointed guns at the store owner and demanded cash.

It was unclear if the men got any cash but police said they fled the store with lottery tickets and cigarettes and ran into a man who was leaving an apartment located in the same building as the store.

"He came outside and heard the clerk and knew something was wrong," said Reading police Sgt. John M. Solecki.

District Attorney John T. Adams said that he didn't expect criminal charges to be filed against the man who shot the suspects. Adams said the man had a weapons permit and was within his legal right to shoot the suspects. Adams said he used deadly force before deadly force could be used on him.

The man noticed that the suspects were armed and wearing masks, so he decided to wait outside the store, police said. When the suspects exited the store the man pulled out his own weapon and shot the two men.

One suspect, wearing black sweat pants, a red sweat suit-type jacket and a tan mask, fell dead in a crosswalk just outside the front door of the store. The second suspect, dressed in all black and still wearing a mask, ran about 20 feet south on Moss Street before collapsing in the street.

Carmella Chipperfield, who lives nearby, said robberies are common at the store and she sympathizes with the store's owner.

"That poor man," she said, referring to the owner. "He's very nice and he gets robbed a lot. He's just trying to make a living and this happens."

Chipperfield said her son was visiting her and ran outside when he heard what he thought were shots, then heard sirens.

"He told me someone was walking into the store and he shot those two men who were robbing the place," Chipperfield said.

Carl Gottshall of Mount Penn said he was making a delivery on Kutztown Road about a half-block from the corner when he and his co-workers heard several shots ring out.

"We ran down and saw the guys laying in the street," Gottshall said. "Then all the cops and ambulances started arriving."

The first officers on the scene called the coroner's office after paramedics determined the two men were dead.

DA: Charges unlikely in fatal shootings at Reading store

 
Berks County District Attorney John T. Adams said he doesn't expect criminal charges to be filed against a man who fatally shot two robbery suspects at a Reading convenience store.

The man, whose identity has yet to be released, was leaving a nearby apartment building around 2 p.m. today when he saw the clerk at Krick's Korner at Ninth and Exeter streets being robbed at gunpoint by two masked men, Adams said. The man decided to wait outside the store until the suspects exited through the front door, and then shot both men once each in the chest area after being threatened by them, Adams said.

"I think that this is an incident where the concerned citizen acted justifiably under the law," Adams said.

One suspect, wearing black sweat pants, a red sweat suit-type jacket and a tan mask, fell dead in a crosswalk just outside the front door of the store. The second suspect, dressed in all black and still wearing a mask, ran about 20 feet south on Moss Street before collapsing in the street.

Adams said the man, who he described as a "concerned citizen," had a weapons permit and was within his legal rights to shoot the alleged robbers.

"He told these individuals to stop, and 'I'm calling the police,' and that's when these individuals drew their guns, and there was a scuffle." Adams said during a press conference Monday night. "He used deadly force before deadly force may have been used on him."

Adams said the man is a Berks County resident who works in the neighborhood, as well a friend of the store owner.

Krick's Korner has been robbed at least twice over the past several years, police said.

Monday's robbery was captured on surveillance video.

The alleged robbers walked into the stores with their handguns drawn, Adams said, and then proceeded to terrorize the store owner before stealing money, cigarettes and lottery tickets.

The men also drew their guns on the concerned citizen before being shot, Adams said.



"These two men chose this store as their prize for the day, and it didn't work out very well," he said.

Adams added that the police department is investigating the suspects' involvement in prior robberies.

Reading police said they're also hoping to identity a third suspect who drove the alleged robbers to the store.

When asked if he has concerns over citizens taking such matte

Adams said the man who shot the alleged robbers is concerned for his safety and has been offered protection and relocation services by the Reading Police Department.

"He was put in a situation that none of us want to be put in," Adams said, and later added, "He was very brave, very brave. He could have ran away. He chose not to."

Adams said Pennsylvania's expanded Castle Doctrine, the state's "stand your ground" legislation, didn't weigh into the decision to not charge the shooter.

"It has nothing, nothing to do with stand your ground," he said. "The bottom line is, under the law, this was justified."

The Castle Doctrine, revised in 2011, says a person can use deadly force rather than retreat during a fight. Pennsylvania is one of 22 states with stand your ground legislation.

rs into their own hands, Adams said, "Of course none of us condone violence. However, under the facts and the circumstances of this incident, we believe that the concerned citizen acted well within the law and as a result he was released."


Obamacare: What's Next, and Next, and Next, and Next?


From Ace:

As Jake Tapper reports, documents have leaked showing that Obama's Obamacare "War Room" is panicked about What Comes Next.
Officials expressed concern that the next shoe to drop in the evolving story about the Affordable Care Act would be disappointment from consumers once they are able to get on the troubled HealthCare.gov website – disappointment because of sticker shock and limited choice, according to a new document obtained by CNN. 
“Mike described a general concern of PM (Project Management): getting to the point where the website is functioning properly and individuals begin to select plans; the media attention will follow individuals to plan selection and their ultimate choices; and, in some cases, there will be fewer options than would be desired to promote consumer choice and an ideal shopping experience. 
Additionally, in some cases there will be relatively high cost plans,” say the notes from the Obama administration’s Obamacare 'War Room' from one week ago.
AllahPundit games this out and figures it's going to take a lot of Distractions to draw the eyes away from the months and months of trainwreckage on the horizon.
The point, though, is that horror stories about people losing their doctors en masse are still to come and the White House is preparing for them. Which makes me wonder: 
Given all the political agony that’s in store for red-state Democrats up for reelection next year, how much longer can they afford to stand by the law? 
Even if the website’s fixed tomorrow, they’re staring at a parade of horribles well into 2014. 
Rate shock is the story now; the next story will be whether O-Care can possibly hit its enrollment targets in order to make the program sustainable. (This assumes that Healthcare.gov will begin operating smoothly soon. If it doesn’t, the next story will be all about Democratic panic and Obama’s bad options in minimizing the damage from a busted enrollment drive.) 
The next story after that will be people outraged at how their provider networks have shrunk. After that comes the March 31, 2014 deadline for enrollment; will the administration reach its target on that or will the deadline be extended, raising the risk of an adverse selection problem for insurers? 
And then, as a cherry on top, after a long summer of the GOP showcasing ObamaCare nightmare stories, insurers will release the 2015 rates next October and there’ll be a new flood of small-business employees agonizing publicly about how high the premiums are on their new exchange-bought plans. 
It’s nothing but sh*t sandwiches for Senate Dems until next November. How long before they lose their appetites?
You guys know what happens when Obamacare fails to sign up enough young, healthy Taxable Units and the insurance companies incur major losses? Have you heard?

What happens is, get this, a huge federal bailout already provided for in the law itself:
[T]here are deep-in-the-weeds protections baked into the Affordable Care Act: risk adjustment, reinsurance, and risk corridors… … 
[R]isk corridors will play the biggest role if the individual mandate does get delayed. Their entire purpose is to stabilize premiums during the first three years of Obamacare, when it’s especially difficult for insurers to price plans. 
Here’s how it works: exchange plans (QHPs) projected how much their risk pool would cost overall in 2014, their “target” cost. If they’ve significantly miscalculated—or, say, if a mandate delay causes adverse selection that they couldn’t have predicted—HHS will take action. 
As McIntyre describes in more detail, the “action” involves a 50 percent bailout for costs that exceed 103% of the insurers’ cost target, and an 80% bailout for costs that exceed 108% of target. 
If a plan undershoots its cost target, it has to pay HHS according to a similar formula for costs below 97 percent and 92 percent. Section 1342 of the ACA states that the “target” amount is the total of all premiums paid minus administrative costs — that is, it’s the break-even point for the plan. 
Ideally, the plans that undershoot costs are supposed to pay for the ones that overshoot. But there is no such limit contained within the law, so if an industry-wide problem develops, it has not been been budgeted for. 
As McIntyre puts it: 
Importantly, it doesn’t need to be budget neutral; if the math demands it, the government can pay out more than it collects through the program. This could be expensive—the CBO scored the health law as though risk corridors were budget neutral—but it could also be offset by foregone subsidies. 
This helps explain why Obamacare is attractive enough for insurers to take the risk. They won’t recoup everything if it goes badly, but even if a plan’s costs are twice as great as the premiums collected, its losses are limited by this provision alone to 23.9 percent of premiums collected through 2016. (There are further provisions designed to mitigate losses by having plans with lower costs share the risk with plans that have higher costs, but none of that depends on the taxpayer.) 
What if the mandate is not delayed, but the current enrollment “glitches” cause an adverse selection problem anyway (i.e., the most desperate uninsured are more likely to have the persistence to enroll and enrollment of healthy people just never catches up)? 
An industry-wide bailout might be needed anyway. Either way, next fall, if higher premiums are announced for exchange plans in 2015 and it becomes clear around the same time that a bailout of insurers is on its way, it isn’t going to go over well with the public. 

It Gets Worse… Team Obama Knew Users Would Not Like O-Care Cost and Options



GET THE WHOLE STORY AT GATEWAY PUNDIT.
Joe Satriani
Cryin'

Monday, November 04, 2013

Dear Pastorius,

John Lee & Canned Heat


And furthermore
Nazareth 

CHEERS,DUDE!

The Money Quote In Today's WaPo

The last paragraph of this article about ObamaCare:
“I pay my taxes. I’m assistant chief of the volunteer fire department here in Cedar River and a first responder for Mid-County Rescue,” Prestin said. “You try to be personally accountable and play by the rules, but the more you play by the rules, the more you get beat up on.”