Sunday, March 25, 2018
Historic churches install metal detectors to prevent terrorism
And the Globalists say, the only solution to this problem is MORE MUSLIMS!Historic churches install metal detectors to prevent terrorism https://t.co/wfD7NI2HNT via @nypost— Jewhadi™ (@JewhadiTM) March 25, 2018
FOX NEWS POLL: AMERICANS HATE THE SECOND AMENDMENT
This is what happens after 50 years of the Government-Media/Academia Complex, and the importation of Third World citizens who lust after oppression and free handouts.Fox News Poll: Which is more important to protect? https://t.co/GBFEtQnnmL pic.twitter.com/MIr3umHnxQ— Fox News (@FoxNews) March 25, 2018
By the way, our rights are given to us by God, not by men, or by Governments (which are just groups of men).
Therefore, I am willing to fight and die before these rights are taken away from me.
Who's with me?
Devin Nunes: The Only Collusion We Found Was DNC and Clinton Campaign with the Russians
Rep. Devin Nunes: We also found no collusion between the Trump campaign but we did find links between the Clinton [campaign] and the Democratic Party to the Russians… Fusion GPS was paid by the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign to collude and interact with Russians to get dirt on President Trump.
BREAKING: Police officers slashed with sword in Manchester - area on LOCKDOWN
BREAKING: Police officers slashed with sword in Manchester - area on LOCKDOWNhttps://t.co/EVVOrZK815— Defend Europa (@DefendEvropa) March 25, 2018
Jordan Peterson Is Driving His Critics to Desperate Attacks
From the American Thinker:
Jordan Peterson, the Canadian clinical psychologist, is having an enormous impact on our culture. His refusal to use legally mandated language has reverberated around the world. He is obviously rattling leftists as they continue to make hysterical claims about him.
The most recent and long-winded example comes from Nathan J. Robinson, the editor of Current Affairs. He published an almost twelve-thousand-word essay in that journal. It's hard to believe, but even with all those words he lands not a single blow on Peterson. He does manage to make a complete fool of himself.
His essay begins by listing an impressive group of people, including the head of Harvard's Psychology Department, who praise Peterson's work. He then sets out to try to prove them all wrong. He also lists a large number of writers who have treated Peterson unfairly. He then supersedes them all.
There is no way to cover all the silliness in this piece, but I can explain a few of the problems in it. If you think I'm making this stuff up, by all means, read the whole messy, wordy essay. Robinson has a long windup.
There are many long paragraphs with snide remarks and hand-crafted editing designed to make Peterson look vague. The man is anything but vague.
Finally, we arrive at the first factual disagreement with Peterson. In the famous interview with Cathy Newman, Jordan said that you now have more female than male doctors, and the trend in that direction is accelerating. Robinson tells us there are not more female than male physicians either in the U.S. or Canada. (In context, you can hear the rim shot.)
It's worth dwelling on this supposed killer line. Peterson was in England being interviewed by Newman. His English interviewer is pelting him with questions about the lack of female executives in England. Jordan explained that women are often drawn to alternative professions. For example, you, in England, have more female doctors than male. That's what he said, and he is correct.
Don't take my word or his. Invest thirty minutes to watch a truly intelligent and, under the circumstances, gracious person at work in that half-hour interview. While it's worth noting that trends in the medical profession in North America are moving in the English direction, the current ratios are not germane to the conversation Jordan and Ms. Newman had about England.
It is fair to ask: was Robinson trying to slip one by, like a Clintonian lawyer, or is he just sloppy in his thinking? I think it's a combination of both in roughly equal measure. He, like many of his peers on the left, is half-cocked. That phrase will come in handy later.
The original basis for Peterson's worldwide notoriety is his objection to being compelled to use legally mandated language. This is a huge step beyond the current Canadian laws, which prohibit and criminalize certain speech.
Robinson denies that the law does any such thing and that it's crazy to think speech would be criminalized. The link he provides looks moderate enough. It's the text of the law that simply adds gender pronouns to existing hate speech law. Robinson is careful not to link to the existing law, but we easily grasp its content by noting that the amendment is to the Criminal Code.
I'm not a lawyer, so instead of the legal text, here is Wikipedia on that criminal code. Peterson is right. Again, I don't think Robinson is lying. There is a funny space that some people on the left occupy that blinds them to facts. They are just very odd people.GO READ THE WHOLE THING.
Remember The Palm Sunday Massacre in Egypt
As we celebrate #PalmSunday tomorrow, let's remember the 44 dead and over 100 injured in last year's Palm Sunday church bombing in Egypt. Never forget those being persecuted by jihadists. https://t.co/wF1Ll5aOl3 pic.twitter.com/aNBPBMsSmQ— Stefanie MacWilliams (@StefMacWilliams) March 25, 2018
Saturday, March 24, 2018
Ann Coulter: ‘In One Generation’ U.S. Will Be ‘South Africa,’ Trump ‘Betrayed’ Voters with ‘Paul Ryan Republicanism’
From Breitbart:
New York Times best-selling author and populist conservative columnist Ann Coulter says the United States will, “in one generation,” become South Africa after President Trump signed off on House Speaker Paul Ryan’s omnibus spending bill that does not include a single provision from the president’s 70-point list of pro-American immigration reforms.
In an interview with Fox News Radio’s Tom Shillue, Coulter slammed Trump, saying he has “betrayed” his base of supporters by signing the omnibus without it including any border wall funding, increasing the “Catch and Release” program, and not adding any new deportation agents to help deport illegal aliens living in the interior of the country.
“I can’t imagine how it could be any worse,” Coulter said. “There’s zero funding for the wall, and in fact, he’s prevented from putting up even one little inch from those prototypes. No, all he can do is build a little pedestrian fence. Nothing that he’s been looking at. None of the prototypes, totally banned.”
Coulter is referring to a provision in Ryan’s spending bill that specifically bans Trump from using any of the new border wall designs his administration has commissioned, only allowing instead for previously-used fencing barriers to be constructed.
Trump has previously noted how that fencing has not been effective in stopping illegal aliens from pouring across the southern border.
“No, the bill actually prohibits him using any of the prototypes,” Coulter continued. “It states what kind of ‘barrier’ can be used, i.e. one that we’re absolutely sure Mexicans can get across.”
“He can repaint some fences,” Coulter said. “There’s a fence down by the San Diego border and he can repaint that.”
Coulter said that unlike her previous pleas to voters to vote for Republicans over Democrats, when it comes to the 2018 midterm elections “there’s no point.” because GOP and Democrat lawmakers “seem to all agree: They want open borders, cheap labor for the Koch brothers, voters for the Democrats. I think we’ll all be in happy unison for the end of America.”
Trump’s signing of the omnibus that does not provide any reforms to the current legal and illegal immigration system — even though Republican voters say reducing immigration is their top priority — is “Paul Ryan Republicanism,” Coulter said.
“This is it. This is it. In one generation this country is going to be South Africa,” Coulter said. “We had this one chance to save it and we were betrayed.”
Deep State Whistleblowers Form Group to Support President Trump, Describe How Orwellian Surveillance Is Used To Destroy People
BINNEY: “If you really want to get away from their surveillance, you basically have to stop using any electronic device, even your credit card. They know where you are, what you bought and fundamentally have a good idea when you left.
OAN: “Binney said another abuse is the practice of Parallel Construction, where an intelligence agency can comb through an individual’s life until they find something illegal. Because this search is without a warrant, it is up to the police to contrive an investigation where they look for what they already have.”
BINNEY: “They pass that information to state and local police for them to go arrest those people and when they do that, they have another set of rules that come down from the DOJ that they can’t talk about the source of information that allowed them to direct the police to do the arrest.”
OAN: “Binney said when it came to the Obama administration’s surveillance of the Trump campaign, the reason the FBI only needed FISA warrants on two people, Carter Page and Paul Manafort, is that President Barack Obama signed an order making two-hop surveillance the default. Two-hops mean that surveillance can start with Paul Manafort and then go one hop more to everyone he had contact with. The second hop means the government can also monitor everyone those people had contact with. Binney said JTFMAGA is coming together now to encourage other members of the Deep State to come forward and expose more abuses of the NSA surveillance program and to support President Donald Trump.”
BINNEY: “[Trump] is the best opportunity to have this chanced.”
OAN: “Binney and his fellow members of JTFMAGA say they are motivated by the conduct of the FBI and other government agencies during the 2016 election cycle. They don’t deny they are ‘Deep-Staters,’ but they would say they are ‘Deep-Staters,’ wearing the white hats.’All this Orwellian bullshit is paid for by our tax dollars.
HIDDEN MOTIVE: Hushed FBI Intel Report Reveals Vegas Shooting Triggered by Paddock’s Anti-Trump Politics
From True Pundit:
In public, the FBI will tell you they still have not pinpointed a motive for the deadly Las Vegas massacre at Mandalay Bay. That was well over six months ago, on Oct. 1. If this is true, the FBI is not very good at its job.
Few believe that to be the case as far as the investigative prowess of rank-and-file agents who do the grunt work for such an investigation. Privately, however, FBI insiders and intelligence officials talk a different game.
A major motivating force behind the murder of 58 people in Las Vegas was Stephen Paddock’s disdain for Donald Trump’s election. Trump’s politics. Trump’s America.
And whomever else was involved in possibly helping Paddock — and there are many theories on accomplices and co-conspirators — likewise shared Paddock’s disdain, FBI sources said.
The concert crowd was targeted because it was packed with Trump supporters and likely GOP voters who helped propel Trump into the White House, FBI insiders maintain. Country music. America. Apple pie. A predominantly white audience.
Differing from the official FBI and Las Vegas Metro Police Department narrative, revelations pinpointed by a True Pundit investigation include:
- The FBI uncovered specific evidence showing that Paddock was anti-Trump and had an affiliation with ANTIFA, though it never was divulged to the public and agents did not follow such leads, per orders of their superiors.
- The FBI & Vegas police worked hard to conceal Paddock’s politics and a classified report linking his ideologies to the massacre.
- FBI and intelligence officials believe Paddock and associates chose to strike the Las Vegas country music concert with over 22,000 people because they likely supported President Trump. FBI agents said they were instructed to keep that key motive quiet too.
- When FBI agents and agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives informed FBI bosses that Paddock didn’t start buying dozens of guns until after Trump’s election, they were told to keep that fact quiet and shrouded
The LVMPD leaked several photos of Paddock’s hotel suite in the days following the attack. These photos depict what appears to be Paddock, deceased and on the floor of suite 32-135.
The official narrative is that Paddock acted alone, bought numerous semi-automatic weapons for some unknown reason, and employed these weapons by himself in the attack on the Route 91 Festival. Several of the firearms pictured were configured with “bump stocks” in order to maximize each weapon’s lethal prowess.
However, the narrative does not account for the number of weapons procured or the escape plan of Paddock.
Also, this narrative does not align with the photos that have been leaked to the media.
Regarding the massive number of weapons and ammunition magazines, Paddock may have been preparing for some sort of conflict, sources said.
From the evidence collected it appears Paddock planned to fight his way out of the Mandalay Bay if necessary. Not die by his own hand.
A portion of a classified intelligence report obtained by True Pundit — used to debrief FBI brass and LVMPD — confirms Paddock’s behavior and purchase of guns after the 2016 presidential election were triggered by his politics.
“Mr. Paddock’s purchasing pattern reflects a violent behavior profile that appears to be inspired by political or ideological bent.” the confidential memo reads. “One possible domestic/political group would be ANTIFA related.
“Mr. Paddock’s first weapons were reportedly purchased in October 2016, with numerous additional weapons (more than 40) purchased in the run up to the attack. The coincidence of such an escalating ramp of weapon procurement is, all beginning just after the election, compelling and cannot be ignored.
“Moreover, the behavior ‘baking period’ from point of first procurement to final act of terror is extremely short and the election appears to have been the trip wire, with the final act inspired by other unknown factors. Key is trying to understand what his purpose was in doing dismounted surveillance in Chicago and Boston, and apparently without any weapons on hand.”
Why has this been so difficult for officials to acknowledge and reveal to the public? Even if it were a hypothesis, shouldn’t the public know about the mere possibility Paddock was triggered by Trump’s election?
Why would the FBI want these pieces of the Las Vegas massacre puzzle withheld from the public? Kept hidden from the loved ones of the victims?
Some FBI veterans and intelligence officials believe Paddock may have been planning additional mass shootings — to be waged either by himself or others — or both. Hence, his escape plan to vacate the Las Vegas hotel following the shooting.
Such a wider conspiracy would reveal a much larger scheme and shatter the FBI’s official narrative that Paddock was a lone wolf, a mysterious man who has stumped law enforcement and went to great lengths to do so.
But as we all now know, there is finally a revealed motive. Even if FBI brass and Las Vegas officials and police keep trying to tell folks they have yet to nail one down.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)