Ron Paul accepted money KNOWINGLY as it turned out from Don Black of Stormfront, who appeared (s) weekly with David Duke on his radio show espousing what Duke espouses HAPPILY.
Ron Paul refused to return it.
Ron Paul's refusal and his dalliances with the racist at birth John Birch society will UNQUESTIONABLY draw a sure defeat from likely victories in 2010 and 2012.
His backing, movement, backers, CULT LEADERS and money men should be publicly held to task for this.
He will NEVER get my vote for his actions which put him as outside the mainstream of America as is Barack Obama.
His election if such a calamity ocurred would be the rebirth of progressivism just as Obama's absurd excesses have given life to everything to their right
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uF7v6Ro4RXvPRczPYoYrK465o8hQR2rYRL12QnR3Mj7zvDaCIMIUH2F_7Y1Bl1e_juPHCnQGDCcyw0FqvbwAJnlUEjJuq5gyERWvc4tvJvDculdQykateA1yFBjT4HNmN6YwaoYId00WOIWDzBSj30=s0-d)
19 comments:
HEY. I wanna be an Infidel Babe. I won't vote for Ron Paul, I promise.
I'm in Eddington, Garnet and you get my vote this week.
My name is Inigo Montoya....
Ron Paul will never be president.
The opposition managed to screw with the last presidential primaries & gave us McCain.
IT
WON'T
HAPPEN
AGAIN!
?-did Kissenger 'help' the mccain campaign?
is the JBS really 'racist'?
those whom I know from the JBS are not---
Ron Paul is a disgusting creep, and his followers are just as creepy. I would literally vote for Obama over Ron Paul, and I would send Obama money. That how disgusting I find Ron Paul.
The man is a terrible threat to the tea party movement, conservatism, and the GOP in general. I wish Liz Cheney would beat him a little bit and make him cry on camera so that everyone would see it.
While people like Andrew Breitbart and Marco Rubio fill me with hope for the future, Ron Paul fills me with a sense of dread.
Just listen to him in this clip from a few months back at Jihad Watch, and note the comments section.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/12/ron-paul-theyre-terrorists-because-were-occupiers.html
In an age of biological terrorism, nuclear weapons, cyber warfare, and GLOBAL JIHAD he thinks everyone will be safe if America throws up a few walls and doesn't offend anybody. Oh, and muslims love him so there's your clue.
RP vs. RINOs-Hmmmmm can't decide!!!
Anon somewhere above.. and there are HAMAS member who are not killing jews everyday.
Do some research on the organization's origins, aims, members and methods
It's a definitnion of fringe, failure and marginalized WHACKJOBS whose prime member is Genl Jack D Ripper and his prime complaint.
I'm an old guy, and I remember.
They formed as a rich, old fart's aryan nation, then claimed it was about the constitution, and promptly tried to insist fluoridating water was a commie plot to kill the USA.
Paul is someone I would be HAPPY to WORK AGAINST in a genl election, and I'd go out and work for almost EVERY other repub.
Is it simply a coincidence that Ron Pauls initials remind one of RoP (Religion of Peace)
Take Dr. Seuss' advice Ron Paul - Go away Now.
The time has come,
The time has come
The time is now
Just go go go
I don't care how
You can go by foot
You can go by cow
Ronald Ernest Paul, Will you please go now!
You can go on skates
You can go on skis
You can go in a hat
But PLEASE GO PLEASE!
I don't care
You can go by bike
You can on a zyke bike
If you like
If you like
you can go in an old blue shoe
Just GO GO GO!
Please do do do
Ronald Ernest Paul
I don't care how
Ronald Ernest Paul
Will you PLEASE GO AWAY NOW!
You can go on stilts
You can go by fish
You can go in a KRUNK car if you wish
If you wish, you may go by lions tail
or
Stamp yourself and go by mail
Ronald Ernest Paul,
don't you know
the time has come
to GO AWAY GO!
Get on your way, please Ron Paul ok?
You might like going in a zumble zay
You can go by balloon,
or a broomstick
or
by camelback in a bureau drawer!
You can go by bumbleboat or jet
I Don't CARE HOW YOU GO - JUST GET!
Get yourself a GAZOOoom
You can go with a BOOM!
Ronald RONALD RONALD
Will you LEAVE THIS ROOM!
Ronald Ernest Paul I don't care how
Ronald Ernest Paul, JUST GO AWAY NOW!
I SAID GO! AND GO I MEANT!
The time had come
SO Ron Paul. GO, GET BENT!
Gah!
Ron Paul winning the straw poll is not a good sign.
If conservatism does go in that direction, I'm going to be mighty pissed.
RON PAUL? Who the hell are the people at that CPAC and are they out of their cotton-pickin' MINDS?
And please tell me the JBS hasn't crept out into the daylight again. What's next, the anarcho-capitalists with their black flags?
If these people are seizing control of the Tea Party movement it is in imminent danger of being turned into a grotesque caricature of itself.
And please tell me the JBS hasn't crept out into the daylight again.
I didn't see any evidence of that. However, I was at CPAC only briefly -- to attend FDI.
Now, I do predict that the pendulum will swing too far away from BHO. I've seen such swings before.
Do we have a William F. Buckley out there?
Boy we need one ... only now do we recognize the value of men like Buckley for what he did
Buckley worked as an editor for The American Mercury in 1951 and 1952, but left after perceiving anti-Semitic tendencies in the magazine.[25] He then founded National Review in 1955, serving as editor-in-chief until 1990.[26][27] During that time, National Review became the standard-bearer of American conservatism, promoting the fusion of traditional conservatives and libertarians. Buckley was a defender of McCarthyism. In McCarthy and his Enemies he asserted that "McCarthyism...is a movement around which men of good will and stern morality can close ranks."[28]
According to Buckley, when he first met philosopher Ayn Rand through mutual friends, she greeted him with the following: "You are much too intelligent to believe in God."[29] In 1957, Buckley published Whittaker Chambers's review of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged[30], ostensibly "reading her out of the conservative movement".[31] Objectivists have accused Chambers of merely skimming the novel.[32] Buckley said that Rand never forgave him for publishing the review and that "for the rest of her life, she would walk theatrically out of any room I entered!"[10]
Also in 1957, Buckley came out in support of the segregationist South, famously[33] writing that "the central question that emerges... is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas where it does not predominate numerically? The sobering answer is Yes – the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race."[34] In 2004, he clarified the statement, saying, "the point I made about white cultural supremacy was sociological and linking his usage of the word "Advancement" to its usage in the name NAACP, continuing, "The call for the 'advancement' of colored people presupposes they are behind. Which they were, in 1958, by any standards of measurement."[33] Buckley changed his views and by the mid-1960s renounced racism. This change was caused in part because of his reaction to the tactics used by white supremacists against the civil rights movement, and in part because of the influence of friends like Garry Wills, who confronted Buckley on the morality of his politics.[35]
By the late 1960s, Buckley disagreed strenuously with segregationist George Wallace, and Buckley later said it was a mistake for National Review to have opposed the civil rights legislation of 1964–65. He later grew to admire Martin Luther King, Jr. and supported creation of a national holiday for him.[36] During the 1950s, Buckley had worked to remove anti-Semitism from the conservative movement and barred holders of those views from working for National Review.[36]
In 1960, Buckley helped form Young Americans for Freedom and in 1964 he strongly supported the candidacy of Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater, first for the Republican nomination against New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller and then for the Presidency. Buckley used National Review as a forum for mobilizing support for Goldwater.
In 1962, Buckley denounced Robert W. Welch, Jr., and the John Birch Society, in National Review, as "far removed from common sense" and urged the GOP to purge itself of Mr. Welch's influence.[37]
Epa,
only now do we recognize the value of men like Buckley for what he did
I clearly recall the change in Buckley's philosophy over the years.
Now, THERE was a man.
Okay, I just found this in a comment to a blog I frequent:
"Only 2,935 votes were cast in the straw poll out of the approximately 10,000 people who attended CPAC."
and,
"As the results were displayed on twin large screens in the ballroom – and even before Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio could announce who won – a cascade of boos came down from a crowd that views Paul and his fervent supporters as an irritant."
Check this posting at Right Truth.
Is the Tea Party Ron Paul's own political machine? Is that why they don't like Sarah Palin, or anyone else who is different from them?
It's like how Obama took the Chicagho political machine into the White House, only this is worse because they are lying stating that they care about your views when they don't.
Ron Paul is great, he delivers a consistent message of freedom and individual liberty. He made it very clear what the money is being used FOR (see previous sentence) so it doesn’t matter where it comes FROM. He is the strongest defender of the us constitution, and will hopefully lead this country towards a smaller more fiscally responsible government.
Post a Comment