Tuesday, February 04, 2014

Maybe we messed up on Benghazi, IRS repressions, Iran treaty, etc.. BUT NOW WE HAVE A REAL CULPRIT, GUILTY!!!

From WABI in Bangor Maine:

Oakland Woman Pleads Guilty To Stealing from Social Security Administration

Posted Tuesday, February 4th, 2014 at 7:40 am.
Updated 1 hour ago
An Oakland woman has pleaded guilty to stealing more than one-thousand dollars from the Social Security Administration.
Court documents indicate 50-year old Laura Mathieu submitted a false statement regarding her eligibility for Supplemental Security Income.
She claimed it was just she and her children living in the home and they had no financial help, but prosecutors say Mathieu is married and her husband was contributing financially.
Mathieu faces up to 10 years in prison and a 250-thousand dollar fine.
  • Oakland
    Town in Maine
  • Oakland is a town in Kennebec County in the U.S. state of Maine. The population was 6,240 at the 2010 census. Gateway to the Belgrade Lakes region, Oakland is 4 miles west of Waterville and approximately 18 miles north of Augusta, the state capital
    Don’t you feel protected, safe and ready to go out and vote now that you know the feds know who the dangerous culprits are?
    $1,000 for her kids? Federal crime? Pour encourager les autres?
    This is where we are spending our resources?
    Look what this woman did was wrong. And she plead guilty. But people, in a word of limited govt resources is this where we want to see them spent?
    Isn’t more appropriate to have these human resources looking for large scale medicare fraud?
    Isn’t more appropriate to have these human resources looking for IRS malfeasance in political repression of free speech of groups the president doesn’t like?
    Isn’t more appropriate to have these human resources looking for waste such as the C27J freighter aircraft FLEET the Air Force sent straight from the factory to the boneyard at Davis Montham?
    Or are we paying so many people that we can cull out mothers of families with children at home for $1,000 of fraud?

No comments: