Wednesday, January 16, 2019

Signs Of The Times


PJMedia: H.R. 1: Democrats Act to Strip State Powers Over Elections
The bill is a 571-page dreamscape of wild wishes and federal mandates on states. The Constitution decentralizes power over American elections and puts states in charge. 
H.R. 1 would undo that.* It forces states to implement mandatory voter registration. 
If someone is on a government list -- such as receiving welfare benefits or rental subsidies -- then they would be automatically registered to vote.* mandates that states allow all felons to vote* force states to have extended periods of early voting* 
H.R. 1 also undermines the First Amendment by exerting government control over political speech and undoing the Supreme Court’s Citizen’s United decision.
H.R. 1 mandates same-day voter registration and would obliterate state registration procedures.  
H.R. 1 limits the ability of states to cooperate to see who is registered in multiple states at the same time.  
H.R. 1 would nullify state laws that permit election observers to work as partners with election officials to file a formal challenge to a suspicious voter registration. 
H.R. 1 would criminalize protected political speech by making it a crime to “discourage” someone from voting or to use deceptive practices in politics. 
But the biggest prize in H.R. 1 is to restore Justice Department approval powers over state election law changes, known as “preclearance.” 
Also consider the recent implications at "Ranked-choice voting in Massachusetts" and "Ballot Harvesting" in California.

AND THEN THERE'S THIS:

Beto O’Rourke: I’m open to a conversation about whether America can still be managed under its original principles (i.e. THE CONSTITUTION!)
"Does this still work?” O’Rourke said. “Can an empire like ours with military presence in over 170 countries around the globe, with trading relationships . . . and security agreements in every continent, can it still be managed by the same principles that were set down 230-plus years ago?”
AND THIS:

Poll: Solid majority of Americans support raising highest income tax rate to 70%

AND THIS:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Explains Her Rationale for Confiscatory Tax Rates: Take Money From Billionaires Because They’re ‘Making Tons of Money’ Underpaying Their Workers


AND THIS:

De Blasio Goes Full Commie – Introduces Plan to Allow Government to Seize Private Property

11 comments:

Always On Watch said...

Has our republic already died?

thelastenglishprince said...

O'Rourke answered his own question with his question:

"Does this still work?” O’Rourke said. “Can an empire like ours with military presence in over 170 countries around the globe, with trading relationships . . . and security agreements in every continent, can it still be managed by the same principles that were set down 230-plus years ago?”

The man doesn't probably doesn't even understand the basic acronyms (M.O.A. and M.O.U. come readily to mind) which precede our treaties and legal frameworks with nations.

The Republic is alive and well.

Always On Watch said...

TLEP,
You're looking for consistency in him. Probably not there -- and his cognitive bias will not allow him to consider any contrary evidence.

Pastorius said...

The cognitive bias of those who think this man, Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, etc., are viable American leaders is what really concerns me.

The cognitive bias of the huge numbers of people who believe we should tax at 70% is what bothers me.

Even the Constitution can not survive an overwhelming generational consensus against itself.

Always On Watch said...

Pasto,
Even the Constitution can not survive an overwhelming generational consensus against itself.

The generational thing is what disturbs me the most about our present political scene.

And more such "believers" are being created by the educational-informational complex.

Always On Watch said...

To paraphrase BHO:

the fundamental transformation of America.

thelastenglishprince said...

O'Rourke is just a news product - useful to fill the time in a 24/7 news cycle.

I like to remember that he lost an election. Who wants to give credibility to a man who probably still does bunny ears to tie his tennis shoes? The man is an absolute simpleton.

Always On Watch said...

TLEP,
O'Rourke is just a news product - useful to fill the time in a 24/7 news cycle.

At the moment, that may be true. I wouldn't count on that in a few years. The electorate voted for BHO, you know.

Pete Rowe said...

And they are doing this as the minority party. What do you think will happen next time they control both chambers of Congress? Or worse yet, Congress and the Presidency?

thelastenglishprince said...

Pete,

We will be governed as much of the third world countries in the world. We will have Mugabe, Zuma and Bashir personalities oppressing "We the People".

2020 can't come soon enough. The People will speak again, and with louder voice.

Pastorius said...

If Ocasio-Cortez can get elected, then O'Rourke can.