Why Aren’t We Having a National Conversation About Leftist Violence?

ENVISION HILLARY JUMPING A FENCE TO AVOID THOSE WHO DESPISE HER AND WHAT SHE STANDS FOR. 

What would be the reaction?

What would be hearing? Seeing?

Reading?

From The Federalist:

If a mob of conservatives attempted to shut down a major Hillary Clinton event, as rioters did the other day during a Donald Trump event, America would be thrust into an insufferable national dialogue about the growing violent tendencies of the Right to crush debate. 

There would be a flood of anxious op-ed pieces and cable news roundtables featuring chin-stroking pundits contemplating the future of discourse in America. 

No one would be spared. And you better believe every conservative politician in the country would be asked to comment on this bloodcurdling development. 

Do you, sir, feel that your own rhetoric about immigration and guns has somehow contributed to this ugly trend we’re seeing? 

Does the GOP need to soften its tone on abortion to stop this kind of violence from happening in the future? You might remember that, during the 2009-2010 Obamacare debates, every false and exaggerated claim about Tea Party violence induced a thousand wringing hands to grapple over the fascistic tendencies and ugly underbelly of conservatism. 

You might remember the Democratic leadership in Congress decrying “acts of violence” against House members in concerted effort to create the perception that bloodshed was imminent.

GO READ THE WHOLE THING. 

GUN RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS

THE BILL OF RIGHTS DOES NOT GIVE YOU RIGHTS...

 ... THE BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTS YOUR INNATE RIGHTS AND LIMITS THE GOVERNMENT'S POWER TO ABRIDGE OR INFRINGE THEM..

THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE WITH ARMS;

IT PROTECTS ONE'S RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE WITH ARMS

AND IT LIMITS THE GOVERNMENT'S POWER TO ABRIDGE OR INFRINGE THAT RIGHT. 

PEOPLE WHO WANT OUR 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS INFRINGED ARE NOT ONLY ENEMIES OF THE US CONSTITUTION;

THEY ARE ENEMIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

TREAT THEM ACCORDINGLY.

Just Another Day In Israel: 16-Year-Old Invents New Math Theory

From Israelly Cool:

It’s common for some high school kids to need the help of a math tutor. For others, numbers come naturally. And then there’s Tamar Barabi. The Israeli teenager just invented a new geometric theorem. 

Like most discoveries, the eureka moment happened by accident. Tamar turned in her math homework and the teacher said the theory she used to solve the problem didn’t actually exist. 

“He said if I could prove it, it could be my theory. So that’s what happened,” Barabi told From The Grapevine. 

With help from her dad, who is also a math teacher, they sent the theorem to experts around the world. 

Known as the Three Radii Theorem, or “Tamar’s Theory” for short, it goes as follows: “If three or more equal lines leave a single point and reach the boundary of a circle, the point is the center of the circle and the lines are its radii.” 

Believe it or not, that’s the simple explanation. To compose the actual theorem, Barabi had to write up three proofs, a series of conclusions and some sample exercises. 

“Tamar deserves praise for finding a new twist of stating that a circle has only one center and only one radius,” Professor Ron Livne, who teaches at the Einstein School of Mathematics at Hebrew University inJerusalem, told From The Grapevine. 

Added Ofer Grossman from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology: “It’s cool to see how Tamar’s theorem can give elegant proofs for other important theorems.” 

It’s enough to make Clock Boy explode with rage.

Poll: ‘Total Rejection’ Of Islam In France From All Across The Political Spectrum

From Breitbart:

An Ifop poll for Le Figaro measuring perceptions of Islam has found that people have a growing sense of unease about its role in France. 

What’s notable about the results is that where once such sentiments were perceived as the preserve of the “extreme right”, they are now felt across the political spectrum. 

Back in 2010, 39 per cent of Socialist Party voters felt Islam was too prominent within French society — a majority of 52 per cent feel this to be the case six years on. 

The poll also found that 47 per cent of people consider the presence of Muslim communities a threat to France’s identity, up five points from 2010. 

However, 19 per cent believe Muslims culturally enrich the country. 

Surveys by Ifop going back to 1989 have consistently measured attitudes toward aspects of Islam in French society, and the change over the years paints a picture of a nation whose tolerance has worn thin. 

In 1989 33 per cent of French people responded that they were “in favour” of building mosques, while the figure today is just 13 per cent . 

That year, 31 per cent were opposed to wearing the veil in general, a number that in 2016 has risen to 63 per cent. 

French people’s growing distrust of Islam’s role in the country comes as data from across Western Europe shows that rather than becoming more assimilated over time, the views of second and third generation Muslims have become increasingly hardline. 

Anouar Kbibech, Chairman of the French Council of the Muslim Faith, responded to the survey’s results saying that negative perceptions of Islam cause distress to Muslims living in France. 

The French, he comments, must look upon Muslims as full citizens. He noting that in the past Muslims demanded a right to “difference”, Le Figaro quips that now the Muslims in France will demand a right to “indifference”.

9,000 Photos From 1800’s British Mandate of Palestine, No Trace of Muslims or Mosques

From Pamela Geller:

“Palestinian” is a euphemism for Islamic Jew hatred. Previously I published the actual flag of Palestine before 1948. (above.) 

9,000 Photos from 1800’s British Mandate of Palestine – with no trace of ‘Palestinians’ 

Where ARE all those Palestinians, the proclaimed one million of them who lived in Israel before they were ‘displaced’? 

Nowhere. 

Nowhere, because they never existed. 

And where are all the mosques for those “1 million Palestinians”? With Muslims comes mosques. There can be no Muslim population without a large proportion of mosques. 

If they had been 1 million at the turn of the Century, or even in 1920 after they began immigrating to fight the British, with their rapid population growth Palestine would consist of over 40 million people today and not 4 million. That alone proves the Palestinian jihad lies.

 Flag of Palestine - 1948

Their population is small because they are new invaders and occupiers who arrived late with an aim to commit jihad. They never lost land that was never theirs to begin with! The British army permitted merely a few Ottomans to remain due to religious observations, the rest was Jewish. 

In reality according to eyewitness reports the barren British Mandate had a very small number of people living on it. 

Félix Bonfils (1831-1885) was French photographer and writer who was active in the Middle East. Four years after his arrival he reported 15,000 prints of Egypt, Palestine, Syria, and Greece, and 9,000 stereoscopic-views. He traveled to the region several times and we hear of no mass population of Palestinians, which contradicts everything the Palestinians lie about to the world. 

His pictures did not manage to capture any photographs of a single so-called ‘Palestinian’ who are suppose to have lost land to Jewish occupation, if we believe Arab propaganda. 

All he found was a few bedouines passing through and some remnants of the Ottoman Turks. Guess why? Because the “Palestinian” people as we know them today never existed. 

The original philistines which the Arab jihadi’s named themselves after were a small group of lawless bandits who occupied the region near Gaza by force and died out before the birth of Christ. Islam was created over 600 years after the death of Christ and is the world’s youngest religion. 

Palestinians are a fake creation ordered and constructed by the Grand Mufti Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini [1889-1974]. They were basically discovered (formed and invented) and originate from mass immigration from Egypt and Saudi Arabia with purpose to commit jihad. 

The Egyptian fighters ended up in Gaza and the Saudi fighters ended up in the West Bank according to their rout of entry. This has been well documented by British government reports from the British Mandate and from Transjordan. It also fits the video clips and rants by Hamas leaders, who seem well aware that Palestinians are fake yet continue to argue that they ‘lost land’. 

We are dealing with a terrorist organization here, and not a people who became victims of loss of land.It is also important to pay attention to the fact that once Israel had been assigned to be returned to the Jewish people in 1917, Muslims rapidly began to pour into the region from other countries with a purpose to kill them. 

The first conflict and killing in Israel/Palestine was initiated by the Muslims. At that point to control the population influx the British government stopped Jewish people from entering the area. So for a short span, the Muslim population suddenly became a majority. Not for natural reasons but due to their rapid invasion and occupation. 

Therefore, if we look at timeline of events in history we will quite easily see that the REAL occupiers of the region are the Muslims.

GO SEE THE PHOTOS. 

Stringspace

Bach - Violin Concerto #1 in A Minor

The Way You Look Tonight

Thunderstruck

Ted Cruz Has Only Won Three States Where We The People People Actually Vote

Q: What is the difference between a caucus and a primary?

A: In presidential campaigns, a caucus is a system of local gatherings where voters decide which candidate to support and select delegates for nominating conventions. A primary is a statewide voting process in which voters cast secret ballots for their preferred candidates.

By my count,

TED CRUZ HAS ONLY WON THREE PRIMARIES

Idaho
Texas
Wisconsin

AND, IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN, TED CRUZ HAS NOT WON A SINGLE PRIMARY WHERE ANY VOTER IS ALLOWED TO VOTE FOR ANY CANDIDATE ON EITHER SIDE OF THE AISLE

DONALD TRUMP PULLS DEMOCRAT VOTERS.

Muslim Strong Favorite to Win London Mayor Race

From Reuters:

LONDON (Reuters) - Sadiq Khan, a Muslim lawmaker from Britain's opposition Labour Party, is the strong favourite to win London's mayoral election on Thursday after a bitter contest marked by religious tensions and accusations of racism. 

Polls show Khan, the son of a bus driver, is as much as 20 percentage points ahead of rival Conservative Zac Goldsmith in the race to run one of the world's top financial centres. 

If he wins, he will succeed current Conservative mayor Boris Johnson to become the first Muslim to head a major western capital. London's population of 8.6 million is among the most cosmopolitan in the world and it is rare for identity politics to enter British campaigning. 

Yet Goldsmith, with the support of Prime Minister David Cameron, has for weeks focussed on Khan's faith and past appearances alongside radical Muslim speakers, accusing him of giving "platform, oxygen and cover" to extremists.

Is it true? Is Khan in league with "Extremists"?

EXCLUSIVE: Sadiq Khan, Labour candidate for London mayor, made a speech while the 'black flag of jihad' was flying and gave his support to groups linked to extremism


The MP for Tooting spoke at a London Islamic conference where flags 'associated with militant jihadism' were waved in the audience

The event was organised by a Muslim TV station which was censured by Ofcom for describing women who wear perfume as 'prostitutes'

The station has also advocated marital rape,

Ofcom says Khan has also supported two other groups linked to Islamic extremism

His brother-in-law also 'preached against non-Muslims at an extremist rally in Trafalgar Square'

"Yo, Barry, you did it, my nigga!”

Larry Wilmore, comedian, closing his monologue last night at the WH press corps dinner(roast)
While we can argue as to the real, and extended cultural significance of that (if any) what really caught my eye was this:

“All jokes aside, let me just say how much it means for me to be here tonight,” he said. “I’ve always joked that I voted for the president because he’s black.”“But behind that joke is the humble appreciation for the historical implications for what your presidency means,” Wilmore added. “When I was a kid, I lived in a country where people couldn’t accept a black quarterback. Now think about that. A black man was thought by his mere color not good enough to lead a football team. And now to live in your time, Mr. President, when a black man can lead the entire free world.”

I cannot speak for anyone else, but I have NEVER, EVER had doubt that there would be a black president (altho under NO circumstances would that be a reason for voting for him/her)
One day there will be a Jewish president (and I look forward to THAT visit to KSA), a Sikh president, a female president, a Hindu president, yadda yadda.
I have absolutely NO DOUBT.
Because there are far more people interested in who can do the job well than in some birth characteristic this future president had no control over.

Cruz And Virginia's Convention Delegates

Cruz wins majority of delegates at Virginia convention

Never mind that Trump defeated Cruz two to one in the primary held here in my state.

One commenter at the above thread opined as follows:

Watch out GOP, you're digging your grave. Maybe you'll win the battle of keeping Trump out of the running but you're going to lose the war when it comes to re-establishing your power. This has sickened me to the point that I'll likely never vote GOP again. I'll throw my vote away on a 3rd party candidate with no chance rather than help keep the establishment GOP in power. Get ready for decades of Democrat control GOP. Cruz will never win as the disenfranchised won't give him the vote, they'll either stay home, vote independent, or write-in Trump. You'll lose the WH in 2016 and have no chance for years to come.

[...]

Cruz? You talking about the same "most grass roots conservative tea party candidate" who would sell us out to the illegals but seeing how popular Trump's stance was changed his tune? The conservative guy who supported expanding the H1B visa program until the political wind changed?

Ted Cruz = the GOP establishment's candidate.

“It Is My Dream to Behead Someone”

Khalil Abu-Rayyan, 21, of Dearborn Heights
HERE
I have a song for this, Richard Rogers and Oscar Hammerstein wrote it for me

Any questions?

Take A Message

Remy Shand (with thanks to Redneck Texan)

Remy Shand - Take a Message (2002) from Carl Sagan on Vimeo.

CNN Beats Fox For First Time In 14 Years, Now Number One Rated News Network On TV

Gee, why do you think this has suddenly come to pass?

CNN ranked #1 in cable news in prime time in April. CNN beat Fox News for the fifth time in the last eight months in M-Su prime time (four of the past eight in M-F prime) among adults 25-54. 

The last time CNN had this many prime time wins in an eight-month period versus Fox News was over 14 years ago (Nov. 2001). 

CNN also handily topped MSNBC this month in all dayparts, with CNN besting MSNBC for the 22nd straight month in Total Day (among both total viewers and among adults 25-54) and in prime time (among 25-54). 

In total viewers, CNN has now beaten MSNBC for the fifth straight month (or seven out of eight months) in prime time. 

CNN continued to top MSNBC by wide margins during the day (9am-4pm) – posting a +36% advantage in total viewers (630k vs. MSNBC’s 464k) and +58% more among adults 25-54 (161k vs. 102k).

AND THEN THERE'S THIS:

Poll: Not A Single White House Reporter Is A Republican

Soul

The Main Ingredient - Just Don't Want to Be Lonely



The Main Ingredient - Everybody Plays The Fool



Bill Withers - Lean on Me



The Stylistics - You Make Me Feel Brand New



Kool and The Gang



Stevie Wonder - I Wish



The Three Degress - When Will I See You Again

Lou Rawls

Natural Man

 

You'll Never Find Another Love Like Mine

Tobacco Road

Nobody But Me