This short speech is worth listening to and worth sharing. It's a British man talking about the slow dismantling of freedom and human rights in European countries because politicians are making concessions to the Muslims in Europe.
He's talking about the Shariatization of Europe. America is on the Islamists' agenda too, but you can do something about it, and I urge you to do it and to urge your friends to do it too.
7 comments:
Loud applause...the crowd goes wild.....Bang on! I couldn't agree more.....Logic dictates that Britain is part of the EU for our very survival......But at what cost....Most of Eastern Europe....including a lot Muslims now live in the UK, claiming child benefit for children overseas. The EU can go to hell....America how about giving us official status as the 51st state? America has a permanent foothold in Europe and we are freed from the Morons in the European Parliament. How about it? ....I'm voting UKIP.
Citizen Warrior,
I'm glad you posted this video. You wouldn't believe what happened the last time we posted it. I'll try to find the link.
Here it is:
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2007/08/pat-condells-back.html
Wow Pastorius, what a thread....well I think you dealt with the BNP very well....you were not suckered in by their 'we are not a racist party' line...Various scars on my body testify they are. What they are though is the result of that truly British attitude of sweep it under the carpet....don't make a fuss...now coupled with a sincere desire to combat issues of racism in our society. The latter combined with the former results in a society that prefers to leave immigrant communities to just do their thing..unchallenged, and assimilated. Assimilation would still occur....but at a slower rate, primarily because of the desire of the immigrant to become part of the host culture. The latter waves of Islamic immigration however do not repeat this process, because of a lack of desire to do so....and as such have for some years remained a people apart....The way immigration and assimilation/integration works in the UK cannot cope with the very nature of Islam. It needs to change. Number 1 would be to force the Islamic communities to open up and integrate. Number 2 would be the return to allowing ourselves to say 'NO! WE WILL NOT TOLERATE THAT!' The Islamic communities draw strength and power from the FEAR of the state to interfere with them. The BNP are responsible for disarming us, they HIJACKED our National symbols...AND FLAG, associating them with abhorrent racist violence. Not British Pride. In doing this they weakened our ability to fight Islam....they made a lot of good white British people ashamed to be British in a sense. We don't fly the flag EVERYWHERE as they do in the US, because of it's associations with racist nationalist ideology. So BNP please for the sake of Britain start flying the swastikas you really want to fly and give us back our flag...
Interesting thoughts, Watcher 71. I had never thought of the idea that the BNP might actually be partially responsible for the political correctness and disarming of the British people.
That makes sense.
I must say, however, I don't think the U.S. does a much better job of assimilating Muslims. I think we do fine with assimilating other communities. Even the overly large Hispanic immigrant population is assimilating, though they are doing so at a slower rate than they are actually moving in.
Anyway, I think that much of the Islamic community (Ummah) is impervious to assimilation. Wherever you go, throughout the world, approximately 25-45% of the Ummah will admit that they want Sharia law to be instituted in their host country.
With numbers like those, we have little hope of assimilating Muslims, even in the United States.
This is my opinion. I would love to hear your response.
It seems to me that thugs do not need a majority to gain political power. Their critical mass is achieved at approsimately the 25-35% number.
The Nazis, for instance, gained power with approximately 30% of the vote.
This is why I think the Parliamentary system is a travesty. The two-party Democratic Republic (controlled by an overriding Constitution) is a much stronger form of government in my opinion.
Orthodox Muslims cannot be assimilated...period. Hmmm as far as the 2 party republic, I can see the advantage...insofar as you either support A or B.....But in a society composed of many political views, does that serve 'Democracy'. Having said that, look at the political and social turmoil in Germany that created the conditions that enabled Hitler to seize power. It is true the populace MUST re-engage politically....We certainly need a change, PR is all cool and 'right on man' but in practice is ultimately unstable...and can result in endless infighting...I would have favoured a United States of EuraAsia.....(ambitious HUH?) but the EU has proven to be an unending Nightmare for us....First past the post is only ever really fair in a 2 party state, which we are no longer and the current situation results in Governments being formed by election results that show 60 70% of voters didn't vote for the winner....questions need to be asked...No I think we need a Galactic Federation with me as Senator Palpataine. What we definatly need is an overriding constitution. Most in Britain are surprisingly hostile to this idea...
Watcher 71,
All views are represented in a two-party Democracy. However, they must compromise in order to get their agenda onto the larger agenda. They must compromise relative to their actual power (percentage of voters) within the total strata of voters.
This is appropriate.
In a multiple-party Parliamentary system, a small party 25-35% of the voters can gain and seize power and push their agenda through coercion as was done in Germany, and as has been done recently in France, and other European countries. In fact, to hear my relatives in the UK complain, no one in Britain supports Tony Blair, PM Brown, or the war.
I actually laugh at that, but they are convinced of it.
It seems to me that those are the kinds of vagaries, and suspicions which are easily upheld in a Parliamentary system. Those types of vagaries lead to conspiracy thinking. You know, the Jews control the American government and media and all that.
You've seen the BBC, right?
Post a Comment