It doesn’t take any kind of IQ to realize that the Obama Administration is the most amateurish, incompetent, non-transparent, unethical even criminal administration this country has ever seen. Even his mental state is called into question.
Case in point. If not him but at least the rest of his Administration must know that his dealings with Iran will lead to nukes in the hands of the most fanatical nuts since Hitler. Yet, he stays that course. What does his Administration know that we don't. They can't all be fools.
The question is WHY?
I'll pose an answer. First – we know of the Sunni Muslim influence on him.If he is a Muslim he is a Sunni.
1. His biological father is Sunni (the majority of Kenyan's are Sunni)
2. His mom converted to Sunni
3. His biological brother Malik says he was raised Sunni
4. His grandmother is Sunni
5. His second dad, the Indonesian oil exec, was Sunni
6. He employs Sunnis to work directly for him in DC
2. His mom converted to Sunni
3. His biological brother Malik says he was raised Sunni
4. His grandmother is Sunni
5. His second dad, the Indonesian oil exec, was Sunni
6. He employs Sunnis to work directly for him in DC
If Obama is a Sunni, why is he siding with Iran that is Shia? Why does he want Iran to be the dominant power in the mid-east? He knows he can’t control them and their dominating power of having nukes will most certainly force the Gulf States – i.e. Saudi Arabia – to get the bomb too that will set off a dangerous arms race in the region.
So why is playing with nuclear fire?
Could it be that he WANTS a war between Sunnis and Shia? That, to me, is one explanation. But to what end? Is he hoping that the two sects would kill each other off and remove the threat of Islam? He may be a Manchurian Candidate for us in America but he might turn out to be the same for Muslims.
I understand such an idea is far fetched but why is he supporting a sect that is an enemy of his upbringing?
Anyone have a different explanation?
5 comments:
Hey, WC, good article.
Here's my take on it:
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2015/03/the-huma-initiative-hillarys-two-top.html
If Obama still holds any of his Sunni beliefs, there could be a darker, more sinister thing at play here.
As Rush (and also WND,) point out, the mullahs (possibly being prodded by Obama) may be trying to force the return of the Mahdi and bring about the Apocalypse.
You don't have to believe in this "prophecy" (I don't) but as long as they do the consequences for humanity could be dire and cataclysmic.
We've raised this very same idea a number of times at IBA over the past few years.
Islam's tripartite alliances are: Traditional autocratic Sunni, Islamist Sunni, and Shia. Obama identifies with the Islamists. The Islamists cannot coexist with either of the other two branches (or anyone else for that matter).
The Islamists seek to arrange a conflict between the Autocrats and the Shia to their mutual destruction, laying the Muslim world open for Islamist domination.
The Islamists are essentially leaderless. They consist of one state (Turkey), a far flung group of sub-state actors (Boko Haram, Hamas, ISIS, the PA), and a world wide network of fellow travelers. Al-Bagdadi has claimed the Caliphate and Erdogan has fantasies of a renewed Sultanate but both are bit players with outsized egos and no nukes.
Remember Obama is a radical, a destroyer, and there is no more destructive force in the world today than Islamism. Also Obama is a very backward looking man. His motivations are the nightmares from his father: anti colonial, anti-imperial, proto Marxist. A vision at least two generations obsolete.
Obama has no grand plan. He dreams only of demolishing a world order he despises. He is a sick man, a madman. His political party is blinded. They dream only of ultimate power here and abroad. The see Obama as their best bet to achieve that end. But they are riding on the back of a tiger that will consume them too.
Hold on there buckaroo.
Where do you get these ideas?
The Mullahs are clearly both Islamist and Shia.
Likewise, the Wahabbists and the Muslim Brotherhood are clearly both Islamist and Sunni.
The word Islamist is a Western definition for "extremist", or person who does not believe in the separation of Mosque and State.
To the Muslims, in general, this definition would mean MUSLIM, or simply ISLAM (FOLLOWER OF ISLAM, as the Koran does not recognize a separation of Mosque and State.
I would like you to tell me where you're getting these ideas.
You are very off in your assumptions.
Very off.
It's Rasputin's fault or would that be Rasputina?
We all need to look at the child's life history, people who have and do wield great influence upon this tool.
Seriously spend 15 minutes investigating her and him.
Post a Comment