The Vice appears to be tightening on Joe Biden.
The New York Times Confirms That David Weiss Said He Was Being Blocked From Pursuing Charges Against Hunter Biden By the DOJ; CBS Actually Reports on BagmanGate
The NYT's report is critical because Merrick Garland testified before Congress that he didn't have to appoint a special prosecutor, with a level of independence from him and the ability to investigate crimes without the need of permission from a boss, because he'd already given David Weiss complete authority to act independently and investigate whatever he wanted without need of additional permission.
He said this to Congress. That means it's a crime if he's found to have been lying.
Which he was. Because both of the IRS whistleblowers say that David Weiss explained to them that he couldn't charge Hunter Biden with more crimes, and couldn't even start investigations on some crimes, because Merrick Garland the FBI were blocking him from doing so.
The NYT has a third source -- independent of either of the two whistleblowers -- who says that yes, David Weiss said that Merrick Garland was blocking him from fully investigating and charging the president's crackhead son.
NYT buries in the 21st paragraph that it has an independent source who confirms the two IRS whistleblowers' claim that David Weiss said he was blocked from bringing charges against Hunter Biden in California.
Note that the New York Times is hiding and undermining its own scoop:
In any situation not involving a major Democrat, that would have been blared in the headlines as a bombshell. In what was presented as a passing mention in a broader piece, the Times independently sourced the damning allegation that AG Merrick Garland committed perjury before Congress (and repeatedly lied to the press and the American people). That's the story here, not the idea that there are "competing accounts," as the headline reads. One side is pretty obviously not telling the truth, and it's not the side that contains the two IRS whistleblowers.
Ironically, despite the aforementioned whistleblowers being technically such and being protected under the relevant statutes, the very same Times that has now confirmed the key component of their testimony is still putting scare quotes around the word whistleblowers.
AND THEN THERE'S ALL THIS:
Biden Bribery Investigation: Comer Demands Burisma Suspicious Activity Reports from Treasury Dept
IRS Whistleblower Reveals How DOJ Gave Sweetheart Deal To Hunter Biden, Who Received $8.3 Million From China, Ukraine and Romania Between 2014 – 2019 (VIDEO)
No comments:
Post a Comment