The Day The Empress’ Clothes Fell Off

To MIT President Kornbluth & Corporation.

Your brilliant PhD student, Liyam Chitayat is asking:

"When you look at the mirror, what do you see? Are you proud of your 'excellent' moral compass?"

"When is the right 'context' to?

Respond to antisemitic reports telling students… pic.twitter.com/az129Q3w5q

— Retsef Levi (@RetsefL) December 10, 2023

 One of the questions posed in the video above is this:

"When is the right 'context' to llow an MIT Chaplin advisor to repeatedly call Israelis “racist white European colonizers”, right before asking students to raise their hands in front of everybody if they eat Kosher..."

Part of my answer is, this is the kind of slander and hatred that has been directed at white people, in general, for years now. It is hard for me to feel sorry for any group, when that group will stand by and allow this kind of racism to be directed at white people.

And before you ask, "What white people?", I will answer, "Well, how about my kids for instance?" They learned this shit at school, and I have had it directed at me, by members of my own family. I repeat, they learned it at school ... and in the media of course.

All this being said, I believe that Jew-hatred is a particularly noxious kind of hatred, as it is spiritual in nature. And it's appearance is a warning that all manner of chaos is about to be loosed upon us. 

The Jews are, as has been said, the canary in the coalmine.

The Day The Empress’ Clothes Fell Off

It may be too much to expect that the Congressional hearings this week, starring the three presidents of Harvard, MIT, and Penn, will wake people up to the toxic collapse of America’s once-great Ivy League. But I can hope, can’t I? In the immortal words of Hitch (peace be upon him), as you listen to these people, “You see how far the termites have spread, and how long and well they have dined.”

The mediocrities smirked, finessed, condescended, and stonewalled. Take a good look at them. These are the people who now select our elites. And they select them, as they select every single member of the faculty, and every student, by actively discriminating against members of certain “privileged” groups and aggressively favoring other “marginalized” ones. They were themselves appointed in exactly the same way, from DEI-approved pools of candidates. As a Harvard dean, Claudine Gay’s top priority was “making more progress on diversity,” i.e. intensifying the already systemic race, sex and gender discrimination that defines the place.

Thanks to the recent Supreme Court case, the energetic discrimination against Asian-American candidates for admission at Harvard is no longer in doubt. But countless other candidates for admission have little to no chance, regardless of their grades, or extracurriculars, because they belong to the wrong race, sex, sexual orientation, and “gender identity.” As soon as students are admitted under this identity framework, they are taught its core precepts: that the “truth” — or, in Harvard’s now-ironic motto, “Veritas” — is a function not of logic or reason or of open, free, robust debate and dialogue, let alone of Western civilization, but of inimical and evil “power structures” rooted in identity that need to be dismantled first. Identity first; truth second — because truth is rooted in identity and cannot exist outside of it.

In the hearings, President Gay actually said, with a straight face, that “we embrace a commitment to free expression even of views that are objectionable, offensive, hateful.” This is the president whose university mandates all students attend a Title IX training session where they are told that “fatphobia” and “cisheterosexism” are forms of “violence,” and that “using the wrong pronouns” constitutes “abuse.” This is the same president who engineered the ouster of a law professor, Ronald Sullivan, simply because he represented a client, of whom Gay and students (rightly but irrelevantly) disapproved, Harvey Weinstein.

This is the same president who watched a brilliant and popular professor, Carole Hooven, be effectively hounded out of her position after a public shaming campaign by one of her department’s DEI enforcers, and a mob of teaching fellows, because Hooven dared to state on television that biological sex is binary. This is the president of a university where a grand total of 1.46 percent of faculty call themselves “conservative” and 82 percent call themselves “liberal” or “very liberal.” This is the president of a university which ranked 248th out of 248 colleges this year on free speech (and Penn was the 247th), according to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Harvard is a place where free expression goes to die.

The critics who keep pointing out “double standards” when it comes to the inflammatory speech of pro-Palestinian students miss the point. These are not double standards. There is a single standard: It is fine to malign, abuse and denigrate “oppressors” and forbidden to do so against the “oppressed.” 

GO READ THE WHOLE THING. 

OH, AND BY THE WAY, WATCH THIS VIDEO AT THE 3:00 MINUTE MARK: