Thursday, February 11, 2021

"My New Vagina Won't Make Me Happpy": New York Times Reveals Painful Truths About "Sex Change" Surgery

 

In Sunday’s New York Times, Andrea Long Chu writes a heartfelt and heartbreaking op-ed on life with gender dysphoria. Titled “My New Vagina Won’t Make Me Happy,” the op-ed reveals painful truths about many transgender lives and inadvertently communicates almost the exact opposite of its intended argument. 
Next week, Chu will undergo vaginoplasty surgery. Or, as Chu puts it: “Next Thursday, I will get a vagina. The procedure will last around six hours, and I will be in recovery for at least three months.” 
Will this bring happiness? Probably not, but Chu wants it all the same: 
“This is what I want, but there is no guarantee it will make me happier. In fact, I don’t expect it to. That shouldn’t disqualify me from getting it.” 
Chu argues that the simple desire for sex-reassignment surgery should be all that is required for a patient to receive it. No consideration for authentic health and well-being or concern about poor outcomes should prevent a doctor from performing the surgery if a patient wants it. 
Chu explains: “No amount of pain, anticipated or continuing, justifies its withholding.” This is a rather extreme conclusion. Chu writes: “Surgery’s only prerequisite should be a simple demonstration of want.” 
This is quite a claim. And we’ll come back to it. But as the op-ed builds to this stark conclusion, Chu reveals many frequently unacknowledged truths about transgender lives—truths that we should attend to. 
Sex Isn’t ‘Assigned,’ and Surgery Can’t Change It 
First, Chu acknowledges that the surgery won’t actually “reassign” sex: “My body will regard the vagina as a wound; as a result, it will require regular, painful attention to maintain.” Sex reassignment is quite literally impossible. 
Surgery can’t actually reassign sex, because sex isn’t “assigned” in the first place. As I point out in “When Harry Became Sally,” sex is a bodily reality—the reality of how an organism is organized with respect to sexual reproduction. 
That reality isn’t “assigned” at birth or any time after. Sex—maleness or femaleness—is established at a child’s conception, can be ascertained even at the earliest stages of human development by technological means, and can be observed visually well before birth with ultrasound imaging. 
Cosmetic surgery and cross-sex hormones don’t change biological reality. People who undergo sex-reassignment procedures do not become the opposite sex—they merely masculinize or feminize their outward appearance.

GRTWT.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have no problem with this individual living out their dream/fantasy so long as it does not impact anyone else and is not funded by unwilling taxpayers. This individual can/should enjoy/suffer the fruits of their labors and not impact anyone who doesn't agree with this individual.

Most Likely II said...

Watch the movie "Dead Ringers" (1988) and you'll note the "problem" isn't all with the patients. There's some real sick phuxsticks out there that get off on doing mutilations, and thinking up new mutilations. And they can't get paid enough to do them so they got the satanic-communist evil (D) to get the DoD to pay for them.

The rest of us are only going to give GOD a little bit more time to unfux those mfrs, before we have to.

Let's all pray HE hurries.

Pastorius said...

Yes, I appreciate the Dead Ringers reference. Good one. Thanks.