MISSOURI VS BIDEN: Judge in Missouri v Biden ain't buying what the government's shoveling

 

If you haven’t been following the case of Missouri v. Biden, you should. It’s probably the most important civil liberties case in the history of the United States. The Biden Administration has been shown in court to have employed a vast censorship apparatus that admittedly suppressed truthful information - and some of the answers given by the Biden team to the judge’s questions are truly chilling.

The Missouri v Biden lawsuit sprang from underhanded censorship dealings the Biden administration began with the social media companies almost the second they ascended to the throne. 

Literally 3 days after Biden took office, the government’s censorship operation was flying. The White House immediately launched a pressure campaign on social media platforms to suppress supposed “COVID misinformation.” 

The Surgeon General launched his signature “disinformation” initiative at a Virality Project event at the Stanford Internet Observatory. And, Biden himself publicly pressured platforms on July 16, 2021—one day after his press secretary Jennifer Psaki and Surgeon General Vivek Murthy did the same, as the plaintiffs describe in their filing. 

Everyone from COVID lockdown, vax and masking critics to scientists who had conflicting data in their hands, and just wanted to present it to the public – such as the signers of the Great Barrington Declaration – were driven from view, pilloried from the public square, many times hounded out of their jobs and livelihoods their long established, spotless professional reputations were in tatters. All to promote the government’s approved narrative, their chosen treatments, and favored pharmaceutical partners. 

There were no allowances made for First Amendment Rights in their dogged pursuit of complete control of the information flow. Posts, memes, papers and tweets that were contrary to that goal, even if correct were flagged as “disinformation,” and smothered or completely removed, and the author blocked from whatever the site was after said “infraction” were theatrically deemed either enough or so serious action must be taken to protect the public. 

Thanks to Joe Biden’s Soviet-style Politburo controlling the airwaves and all media with an iron and unconstitutional fist, the first few years of his term brooked little public discussion. 

…As the evidence proves, there was conspiracy behind the censorship. The White House campaign integrated with the Surgeon General, the CDC, and Census Bureau campaigns drew directly from White House pressure. NIAID and NIH censorship efforts draw from the CDC. CISA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI [Office of the Director of National Intelligence] and other agencies worked together and all participate in meetings together to facilitate pressure and censorship. CISA and the FBI worked together to censor the Biden laptop story. NIAID and NIH conspired together to censor the lab-leak theory and Great Barrington Declaration [co-authored by plaintiffs Bhattacharya and Kulldorff]. NIAID [Fauci’s former division at the NIH] is embedded in White House censorship activities. CISA and GEC [Global Engagement Center, the State Department’s censorship arm] coordinate with each other and with NGOs like the Election Integrity Partnership.  

This isn’t a guess. They have the evidence. This happened.

GO READ THE WHOLE THING. 

#MissourivBiden

If you aren't up on this important case, UncoverDC has been covering it in great detail. The #TwitterFiles gave the info to the public, but this case is proving that taxpayer dollars have been used to violate 1st Amendment protections in federal court. https://t.co/7vNlUz8E7Q

— Robert Patrick Lewis (@RobertPLewis) May 30, 2023