All of us, every single man, woman, and child on the face of the Earth were born with the same unalienable rights; to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And, if the governments of the world can't get that through their thick skulls, then, regime change will be necessary.
Friday, September 28, 2012
Thursday, September 06, 2012
Intelligence Committee Chair Describes Explosive Confrontation Between Netanyahu and American Ambassador
From the Atlantic:
Rep. Mike Rogers, the Michigan Republican who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, says that his much-discussed meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem late last month did, in fact, devolve into an sharp confrontation between Netanyahu and the American ambassador to Israel, the former National Security Council official (and former Obama campaign Jewish liaison), Dan Shapiro.
Rogers told a Michigan radio interviewer earlier this week that he had not previously witnessed such a high-level confrontation, and he described Israeli leaders as being at "wits' end" over what they see as President Obama's unwillingness to provide them with his "red lines" in the effort to stop Iran's nuclear program. He also said that neither the Israelis nor the Iranians believe that Obama would use force to stop the nuclear program. (UPDATE: Rogers said as well he believes the Israelis will "probably" bomb Iran if they don't get clearer red lines from the U.S.)
Rogers description of the meeting directly contradicts repeated Administration assertions that there is "no daylight" on the Iran issue with the Israeli government.
Go read the whole thing.
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Why does Obama get along so poorly with Netanyahu?
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Obama "Humiliates" Netanyahu, Walks Out of Meeting to Have Dinner Leaving Israeli PM Alone
One of the subjects here at this blog, in the comments section, today has been Obama's dislike of white people. It is my contention that Obama's friendship with Jeremiah Wright and Van Jones proves he is inured in Black Nationalism.If a President were inured in White Nationalism, we would have no problem saying he was a racist. But, most people have trouble saying Obama is a racist.
This is not surprising. People in 1930's Germany had trouble seeing how evil Hitler was, even though he gave many clues.
I am not saying that I believe Obama is as bad as Hitler. I don't believe that.
I am saying, however, that the example of Hitler's rise in Germany shows us that people will not recognize evil even as it stares them in the face.
It is clear that Obama does not seem to like Jews much either. Jeremiah Wright is a virulent anti-Semite. Obama's Church honored the anti-Semitic "Reverend Louis Farrkhan."
Given that Obama was willing to sit in a Church for 20 years wherein the "Pastor" spoke of Jews as Conspirators controlling the USA, just as if his words had come out of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
Here's a video which dips into Obama's Pastors anti-Semitism:
Now, given that we know the above to be true, is it really any surprise that Obama would deal with the leader of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, in the way that he did?
(London Times)- For a head of state to visit the White House and not pose for photographers is rare. For a key ally to be left to his own devices while the President withdraws to have dinner in private was, until this week, unheard of.
Yet that is how Binyamin Netanyahu was treated by President Obama on Tuesday night, according to Israeli reports on a trip seen in Jerusalem tonight as a disastrous humiliation.
After failing to extract a written promise of concessions on Jewish settlements, Mr Obama walked out of his meeting with Mr Netanyahu but invited him to stay at the White House, consult with advisors and “let me know if there is anything new”, a US congressman who spoke to the Prime Minister said today.
“It was awful,” the congressman said. One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages”, poisoned by such mistrust that the Israeli delegation eventually left rather than risk being eavesdropped on a White House phone line.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Iranian threat should not to be taken lightly
By Bob Feferman @ American Thinker
Following the election of Benjamin Netanyahu as Prime Minister of Israel, we have seen a growing trend belittling the concerns of Netanyahu over the threat of an Iran armed with nuclear weapons. These commentators contend that Iran is not really a serious threat to Israel or to world peace, and what really drives Iranian foreign policy is self-interest and survival rather than any evil intenions. This assertion flies in the face of reality and ignores basic historical facts. Armed with nuclear weapons, Iran would make the Middle East a much more dangerous part of the world. Israel has every right to be concerned, and so should all of us who value freedom.
The premise that Iran's key motivating factor is survival ignores the events of the past 30 years. Look at the list of Iranian sponsored terror attacks over this period, and you'll understand that these events had nothing to do with the "survival" of the Iranian regime. Indeed, the Islamic Republic of Iran has a much more sinister agenda in mind.
From The Israel Project
It funds terrorist groups in the following manner:
* Hamas: $20 million to $30 million annually. Iran pledged an additional $50 million to the Palestinians' Hamas-led government and lent its expertise as the group prepared to take over the Gaza Strip. Hamas members receive intensive training in Iran and from Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hamas operates in Israel and the West Bank and Gaza;
* Hezbollah: $100 million to $200 million annually, plus a reported $300 million after the Hezbollah-Israel war in the summer of 2006. In violation of United Nations Resolution 1701, Iran has re-supplied the Shia terror group with Katyusha rockets, surface-to-air rockets and anti-tank weapons. Hezbollah uses Lebanon as its base;
* Iraq insurgents: $3 million monthly. Insurgents regularly receive intensive training in Iran. Iran provides explosively formed penetrators (EFP). Weapons captured from both Shia and Sunni groups bear markings of Iranian manufacture as recently as 2006;
* Palestinian Islamic Jihad: $2 million a year. PIJ operates in Israel, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank and Gaza;
* Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command: No direct funding, but the terrorist organization runs Iranian training camps in Syria and Lebanon. PFLP-GC operates in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza;
* Taliban: Rocket-propelled grenades, C-4 explosives, 107mm mortars, small arms and surface-to-air missiles.
No one can claim that U.S. foreign policy during the Clinton era was a threat to anyone, yet Iranian sponsored terror actually increased during this period. In 1996, Iran was responsible for the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Dahran, Saudi Arabia that killed 19 U.S. airmen who were supporting the U.N. mandated "no-fly zones" over Iraq. Few Americans know that it was also during this period that Iran reached out to the new terrorist on the block- Osama Bin-Laden.
Since the goal of Iran is exporting the Islamic revolution through its sponsorship of terror, things will only get worse if we allow the world's leading state sponsor of terror to acquire the ultimate weapon of terror. We ignore this threat at our own peril.
Click here to read the complete article.

