William Grigg posting at Lew Rockwell outlines yet another outrage in regards to the second amendment:
Paramilitary Thugs Steal Private Arms Collection
I wrote the following in the 90's though it is relevant today. Additionally I would like to clarify the following: any attempt to force the registration and/or licensing of privately held (see Blair Holt Firearms Act H.R. 45) weapons and/or any attempt to relieve the U.S. population of lawfully held weapons via confiscation will result in war. I can only assure you that should our so called servants find it necessary to pass such hideous legislation that they will be held personally responsible. Let me make this clear. I and those like me won't be slugging it out on our doorstep. We won't wait for you to send whatever foot soldiers are foolish enough to execute an unlawful order. We'll be bringing the fight to you. We'll be coming for those that sent them. You soft handed politicians sleep well now.
The lesser men....
Man posses certain natural rights. He is endowed with these rights at birth and under no circumstance can any man or group nullify these rights. Among these natural rights lies the right to self defense. In the United States we find this right codified within the Bill of Rights under the second article in amendment to the United States Constitution. Now let us suppose for the sake of argument that this natural and inherent right which lies within all men was not codified within our federal or state constitution. Would you the individual still posses the right to self defense? Rational man at this point would answer in the affirmative. However, our society is no longer made up of rational individuals. We are plagued by the nihilists or, as I have come to call them the lesser men. Lesser men in that they are members of the metaphysical mob and have lost their individuality having sacrificed it to the mob god of democracy which is an absolute sign of cowardice; thus certifying them as men lesser than the rational individual who wishes to exercise his inherent rights.
Individuals who have a basic understanding of liberty understand that liberty has no master. Liberty does require responsibility, but to the rational individual this responsibility in no way inhibits the exercise of one’s freedom. The collectivists, however, hate individual liberty and believe it to be an abhorrent concept. Their nanny state mentality leaves no room for individuality or the exercise of freedom. They believe rights are a commodity best managed by the regime and doled out to those apparatchik that the regime finds to be deserving. Read that as civil rights. The right to self defense, (to bear arms), is under continual assault by the regime and its support apparatus of drooling mindless sycophants. They understand that in order to destroy individual liberty, the individual must first be disarmed. A concept as timeless as tyranny itself but still misunderstood by many of our so-called fellow citizens.
In the arena of gun control appeasement invites certain death, as the collective enemies of liberty will not stop until gun ownership is a tale in our future history books. Time and time again the gun lobby has groveled at the feet of their future masters appeasing away your individual liberty while whining about tolerance and compromise. Yet many continue to support these quislings while bellowing about lost rights and unconstitutional actions. You have relieved yourself of your responsibility. You and you alone are responsible for your freedom or lack thereof. Countless times I have engaged in various debates about the so-called constitutionality of various government actions. Each time I want to tear the hair from my head in frustration as these debates are for the most part, conducted with liberty-loving Americans whose sole defense is “they can’t do that it’s unconstitutional”. After baying in a laughter born of frustration my only reply is “So what!” “Who cares what the constitution says!”
Gentle reader, you must understand the constitution both federal and state. They are nothing more than the exportation of an ideal. That ideal being individual liberty. The constitution is a limit upon the government, not the individual, and for all intensive purposes whether or not it guarantees any individual right is irrelevant. We the citizens posses these rights codified or not.
In closing I would like to impart this message to the lesser men who are working so diligently to deprive me of my natural rights. You have a right to your corrupt, irrational, collectivist, ideology that notwithstanding try to inflict your insanity on me in any way whatsoever and I will busy myself littering the landscape with your bleached white skulls. As for you freedom-loving individuals in closing I will say in the tone of the most irreverent Jesse Jackson, “Defy don’t comply” Appeasement is a tool of the coward. No one can relieve you of your natural rights. NO ONE!
and you'll never even see us coming......
More at Five Feet of Fury
2 comments:
That is some damn good camo.
It is because, as Obama and all other Rousseau to Marx Democrats say, the interests of community are more important than are the interests of individuals. It is as simple as that, and people were attracted to "feel" good about the herd and hate the pebble dropping producers of jobs and prosperity, as cited in Save Pebble Droppers& Prosperity on Amazon and claysamerica.com.
Post a Comment