Monday, March 18, 2019

The Shifting Narrative of the Utrecht Shooter: Jihadist Or Not?



Latest shift in narrative:
Lickity split...DailyMailAustralia provides excuses for the shooter:

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Pastorius,

1. The Turkish terrorist Gökhan Tanis appears in this clip of a street interview
by Powned in 2011:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzTZBtJn9Lk

The subject of the interview is the weather.

Fast Fwd to 3:00 where he appears in the white shirt next to his Moroccan (?) friend
in a red and white shirt with a blue cap. They insult the journalist calling her "slut",
"half of your ass is visible". Then calling her "democrat". They allege that the owner
of her publication Powned is a "Jew". And that how she is dressed is not allowed by
Sharia. At the end he grabs the microphone and says that they can publish what he says.

2. President Erdogan of Turkey has said Turkey will do its own investigation into the
attack. https://www.turks.nl/turkije/algemeen/turkije-onderzoekt-motief-gokmen-tanis

Regards,

Snouck

Always On Watch said...

The shifting of the narrative tells me all I need to know.

I grow weary of the constant protection of Islam.

For God's sake! Tell the truth!

Anonymous said...

Actually the authorities tell us that they think the terrorist motive is the most likely one. However, it is clear that the attackers was a confused, coke dazzled individual, with a string of convictions.

Regards,

Snouck

Anonymous said...

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1107963869874540544

Should Islamic terror attacks implicate all Muslims? No.

"Its OK when we do it."

(Based on headline: "The Christchurch shootings should implicate All White Australians"
"Shame and apology is not enough in confronting our country's virulent racism."

Pastorius said...

Snouck, I have a question for you. The guy in the video has medium brown hair, almost reddish, and he looks kind of Jordanian, not Turkish.

Are you sure that's him? How do you know?

Anonymous said...

Hi Pastorius,

The video was shown first in the comments and then in several articles on geenstijl. There is consensus that the person in the video and on the camera footages in the tram where the shooting started is the same person.

Geenstijl is a big website and has millions of viewers. It is the real thing.

One of the links specifically linking the guy in the video to the terrorist is:
https://www.geenstijl.nl/5146785/030-verdachte-gokmen-tanis-is-haatdemocraat/

Regards,

Snouck

Anonymous said...

Actually there was another incident during the weekend, which was not picked up by the media: in Amsterdam, on a market, a Jewish merchant and his son where attacked by their Egyptian neighbour with a cutlass or sword. Both father and son (identified as family C.) were injured.

There is video: https://www.joods.nl/2019/03/was-steekpartij-amsterdam-een-antisemitische-aanval/

It happened Saturday 16 March.

The attacker is a radicalized Muslim according to the laywer of the victims Herman Loonstein.

Regards,

Snouck