Coronavirus Circus, Round 2

Reports have been coming out of a supposed “second wave” of the coronacircus, which would call for a new round of house arrests, forceful business closures and other liberticide, oppressive and iniquitous measures. Whether people would have to wear their face diapers while locked up at home remains unclear.

Just today, a German district has ordered the “first local virus lockdown since easing” (archive 1, archive 2).

Before we expand on this, we would like to ask a few rhetorical questions.

• Why was Sweden allowed to completely avoid a lockdown? How does the average Brit react to such a video, produced and promoted by the BBC (video archive 1, archive 2)? Why do so many MSM outlets, amidst their fear porn, laud Sweden’s response, saying it’s based on “science” and “trust”? Why do even MSM articles seemingly criticizing Sweden for its policy flaunt pictures of happy Swedes enjoying life? Why did the WHO praise Sweden at all?

• Why would the media give massive publicity to a letter by “health experts” and say the BLM “protests” around the USA shouldn’t be shut down “under the guise of maintaining public health for COVID-19 restrictions“?

• Why would the WHO admit the spread of the coronavirus is “very rare” among the asymptomatic (video archive 1, archive 2), and why would such a statement be given so much publicity? Whether they mildly “backtracked” following “pressure” only served to give even more publicity to the initial statement. CNBC even “involuntarily” uploaded the WHO video with the title “do not make public”, and left it up long enough for it to be seen over 300,000 times, and screenshots to be widely shared on social media.

• Why would the UK MSM give publicity (archive) to the fact more than 20% of Brits openly say Covid-19 is a hoax? Many outlets have reported this piece of information (archive, archive).

• Why would New York governor Cuomo, of all people, state that “most coronavirus cases are from people staying at home”, something he calls “shocking”?

• Why would the German MSM give publicity (archive) to a “leaked report” calling the Covid response as a “global false alarm”, and why would they admit it will benefit “populist parties” such as AfD?

• Why would the British MSM publish articles admitting the “two-meter” rule has no basis in science (archive, archive, archive)? Or that tens of thousands of coronavirus tests have been double-counted (archive)?

• Why would the MSM publish so many countless stories of how billionaires got so much richer because of the pandemic and lockdowns?

• Why would Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News, #1 Iraq war cheerleader, biggest cable news network in the USA, have its host Tucker Carlson claim “we were lied to about coronavirus and the mass lockdowns” (video archive 1, archive 2)?

There are so many other examples we could fill up pages. To summarize, why would the MSM spread the fear of a “second wave” of lockdowns, while government officials are at the same time saying Covid is essentially harmless; that’s indeed what the CDC’s revised numbers state (archive); this article is the Danish equivalent, and the video below is the British authorities saying the same thing.