Not only is there an increased risk of illness with the inoculations, but there’s also an increased risk of death. Advertisement - story continues below On the left, you’ll see a table that shows deaths and causes of deaths that occurred prior to unblinding, meaning deaths that occurred in the first two months of the trial.
As one of the justifications for the inoculations was to protect people from death, you would expect to see a reduction in deaths on the inoculation arm. Instead, their deaths are actually slightly higher at 15 deaths for the inoculation arm versus 14 for the placebo arm.
So that already looks bad for the Pfizer inoculation, but it actually gets worse in the months after on blinding, which is when placebo participants started crossing over and getting the inoculation because five more people died and all of them had received the inoculation. Pfizer didn’t put these deaths in a table like the others.
We actually found them buried in the text of the report, three people from the original inoculation and two people who had originally been in the placebo arm but had crossed over and taken the inoculation died. So that gives us 20 total deaths in the inoculation arm versus 14 in the placebo.
This increase in deaths is level one evidence of harm because it comes from a randomized control trial. Advertisement - story continues below And again, these trials were supposed to prove the inoculation safe, but they didn’t. Instead, they prove that the inoculations cause harm, including death and the kinds of deaths we see here are also concerning.
The Canadian Covid Care Alliance continued to discuss that Pfizer’s six-month report data showed although there is a reduction in COVID-19 cases by the inoculated group compared to the placebo group, the inoculated group also showed an increase in illness and deaths.
On the right, you’ll see Pfizer’s efficacy numbers, which they present quite proudly in their report, and it shows a reduction of positive cases of 91% in favor of the inoculation arm of the trial.
On the left is a table showing the adverse events from the trial. You won’t actually find it in the report itself. You have to dig into the supplementary appendix in order to find it. This table is really concerning because if you recall, the justification for the inoculations was to reduce illness and hospitalization.
Yet here we see that the inoculation arm showed an increase in adverse events in almost every category.
For example, if you look at related adverse events, which are adverse events that the investigators determined to be caused by the investigational product, there were over 5000 in the experimental arm and just over 1000 in the placebo group.
So that was a 300% increase for people who’d taken the inoculation. And when we look at severe adverse events, things that significantly interfere with normal daily function, there was a 75% increase.
And then if we look at serious adverse events, which is anything that involves a visit to the Er or the hospital or any long-term side effects, there’s a 10% increase in the inoculated arm.
So what we’re looking at here is actual level one evidence from a randomized controlled trial that the Pfizer inoculations increase illness rather than reduce it.
This is the opposite of what governments need the inoculations to do, and it means that they have failed to prove that these inoculations are safe. It doesn’t matter if you reduce case numbers. If you are endangering people by making them sicker than they would have been otherwise.