The Times: ‘Jailed rapist given chance to see his victim’s child’.— Sammy Woodhouse (@sammywoodhouse1) November 27, 2018
Rotherham council have offered convicted rapist access to my son.
This is happening all over the UK and must stop! An investigation and change in law is needed. https://t.co/dxSnGt29Is pic.twitter.com/7nJ1jnvJGN
IN another outrageous betrayal of the many Rotherham grooming gang victims and rape survivors across backward Britain, councils are now forcing women who have had children as the result of being raped by Muslim paedophile gangs to add the name of the ‘father’ to their children.
The issue is a grave one; with the end result being that paedophiles who rape children are being given protection by the establishment to have rights to children – yet another backward, illogical policy in 21st century PC Britain.
In 2018, grooming gang rapist Arshid Hussain, who was jailed for 35 years in 2016 for raping Woodhouse, was contacted by Rotherham Council about care proceedings and his parental rights as the ‘father’ of Woodhouse’s child.
At the time, Sammy told the BBC that she was “shocked” when she was informed of the council’s approach.
Ms Woodhouse rightly described Hussain as “a danger to myself and to other children”.LONDON TIMES: JAILED RAPIST GIVEN CHANCE TO SEE HIS VICTIM'S CHILD
A council invited a jailed sex offender to play a part in the future of the child of a woman he raped, The Times has learnt.
The rapist, who was part of a grooming gang, had no parental responsibility for his son but the local authority contacted him in jail and gave him a chance to seek visits from the boy.
Campaigners said that the “perverse” decision amounted to an offer to “retraumatise” his victim.
The Ministry of Justice said that it was investigating whether it was the result of a social worker’s error or systemic failings.
To protect the child, this newspaper is not naming the council or his parents. They featured in a criminal trial in northern England in which several men of…This is not "England". This is like something out of Dante's Inferno.
GO READ THE REST.
10 comments:
Tell me again why it is "moral" to force a girl or woman to give birth to the result of a rape? Or should obedience to the sacred dictates of self-sacrifice include making the rapist a "partner" in its upbringing? Did any consideration for the suffering of the woman forced to bear this child ever enter the brains of those "community" stooges?
You would punish the child for the sins of the father? Here, we allow the mother to terminate the father's rights if conception results from sexual assault.
I do not believe women should have to carry the child of a monstrous rapist within their bodies.
Ok, but I am still not clear what the child did to deserve summary execution.
This story has little to do with abortion, since this young lady chose to have the child, she could very well have aborted.
Now that I have said that, I will say this to you, Pete.
If a man like these assholes raped your daughter or your wife, would you kill him?
Because that is my test for manhood.
How do you feel about that?
We all have our own opinions on morality. I work out my salvation with fear and trembling.
No one wants to cross some of my lines.
I've seen quite enough shit in my life. I don't have much patience for much more.
I like you. This is not against you. It is said as in illustration of how morality can be constructed in an individual.
Do you want to tell me I would be immoral if I tore one of these motherfuckers throats out with my bare hands?
I do have a problem with capital punishment for rapists or those who harm children. I only have a problem with punishing the innocent, which is exactly what the unborn are. Due Process is given to everyone who makes it outside the womb. The State should not sanction death for those who are not born and cannot even speak to defend themselves.
Rather, I do not have a problem with capital punishment...
Well, you and I have made our opinions clear. I respect you very much. You do great work. I do not do work at your level, Pete. So please understand my level of respect for you.
But yeah, murder is on my mind when I think of these men.
Anything that comes from them is filth to me. They are modern day Cananites, as far as I am concerned.
Now, God did not tell me that, so no one has to worry that I am going to act on that. It is only my opinion. And I have all kinds of opinions.
But if these people crossed my family, yeah. Again, yeah.
I understand your feelings. If I was on a jury for someone accused of killing a child rapist, then I would probably vote not guilty.
Post a Comment