Saturday, September 26, 2009

Evil leading the blind

The United States government's stepped-up courting of Islamist groups is on display at the State Department web portal The site bills itself as a place to "meet the people" and "explore the values and ideas that define the character of the United States." But when it comes to American Muslim organizations, that often means providing a U.S. government stamp of approval to organizations linked to the Muslim Brotherhood such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) or apologists like the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

A September 4 podcast about President Obama's Community Service Initiative illustrates how the federal government gives free and favorable publicity to Brotherhood-linked Islamists. noted the contribution of Dalia Mogahed (a protégé of terror-apologist John Esposito) to the president's initiative. Mogahed and Esposito work together at the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies. The two collaborated in writing a book. Read a favorable review here.

The podcast added that Mogahed, executive director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies and a member of the President's Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, had launched, "a Web site that identifies a national goal of 1,000 service projects for Muslim Americans." It quoted at length from a speech Mogahed delivered to ISNA's national convention setting out principles for the president's initiative.

During the Cold War, government bureaus like the United States Information Agency worked to counter disinformation by driving home the point that freedom and democracy are superior to communism and tyranny. But Zuhdi Jasser, head of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, says that in today's struggle with radical Islam, the United States government is doing something very different – even perverse.

It is aiding and abetting the efforts of groups like CAIR and ISNA to anoint themselves representatives of all American Muslims - even though many Muslims want nothing to do with the Islamists.

At a July 20 meeting on Capitol Hill with Farah Pandith, head of the State Department's new office of representative to Muslim communities, Jasser criticized the 64-page booklet "Being Muslim in America" as an example of what is wrong. The publication is "like Pravda. It's all about how Muslims in America are motherhood and apple pie," Jasser said he told Pandith. "It's like the Muslim community has no warts" or divisions.

Nothing could be further from the truth, says Jasser. In presenting this monolithic, idyllic picture of Muslims, the State Department is ignoring inconvenient facts like the intra-Muslim debate over imposition of Sharia and Muslims' larger relationship with non-Muslims, Jasser told IPT News.

At the meeting, organized by Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus founder Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC), Pandith reacted defensively when Jasser (accompanied by representatives of non-Islamist Muslim groups like the World Organization for Resource Development & Education and the Islamic Supreme Council of America) criticized the State Department for letting Islamists monopolize the debate.

In interviews, Jasser and Khalim Massoud, head of Muslims Against Sharia (who did not attend the meeting organized by Myrick) emphasized that the State Department continues to assist anti-freedom elements in the Muslim community. As examples of what is wrong, they pointed to a number of items that appeared on the site in recent weeks:

*An August 26 story by Carla Higgins entitled "Muslim Americans Mourn Death of Sen. Edward Kennedy" consisted almost entirely of an ISNA statement praising the late Massachusetts senator.

* An August 26 story by Ahmed Mohamed ("Muslim Americans Launch Community Service Initiative") which reported that "Muslim Americans are showing their support for Obama's community service appeal by launching the Muslim Americans Answer the Call Campaign."

Like the September 4 podcast quoted above, Mohamed's story noted that the campaign is led by Mogahed and quoted at length from her ISNA national convention speech in July. The article also included a list of seven bullet points outlining CAIR's contribution to the President's community service initiative. It quoted CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad praising the initiative as "a unique opportunity to tell their story through service to others."

* An August 20 story also by Ahmed Mohamed ("New Documentary Film Explores Muslim Experience in America") that reads like a press release for "Journey into America," a movie which premiered July 4 at ISNA's convention. In making the film, a research team traveled to numerous American mosques. The story quotes ISNA President Ingrid Mattson praising the film as one that would allay Americans' fears of "what might be going on behind the doors of these mosques."

Producers of the ISNA-endorsed documentary linked to Mohamed's Aug. 20 article on their blog. They wrote that the story "not only gives our documentary an immense amount of publicity in the global arena of politics and international relations" but "also proves that high ranking American officials have endorsed the message which we communicated."

* An August 19 story by Howard Cincotta entitled "Muslim Americans Find Their Voice Through Advocacy, Engagement: Muslim organizations bringing message of inclusiveness, involvement." Salam al-Marayati, executive director of MPAC, was quoted extensively in the story, and his picture appears in it. The story linked to the websites of CAIR, ISNA and MPAC. MPAC its officials have a history of defending terrorist organizations like Hizballah and anti-Israel slanders, including al-Marayati's suggestion that Israel may have been behind the September 11 attacks. (See here and here).

ISNA President Mattson was also quoted in the article, which notes that Valerie Jarrett, one of President Obama's top advisers, spoke at ISNA's July convention. The piece links to the to the websites of the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University, a Saudi-funded institution headed by Esposito, and the Fiqh Council of North America.

* An August 11 story by Ahmed Mohamed reads like a press release for ISNA's "interfaith dialogue" efforts.

* An August 3 story by Ahmed Mohamed entitled "American Muslims Urged to Increase Community Activism" reads like a press release for ISNA's national convention. The story consists of quotes from Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) and other convention speakers dispensing platitudes about the need to reform health care and the importance of things like "peace," "dignity," "serving humanity" and being a "good citizen" and "good neighbor." The story said nothing about ISNA's radical background, in particular its Muslim Brotherhood links.

* A July 9 story by Mohamed entitled "Islamic Society of North America Promotes Community Service" was a veritable infomercial for ISNA's 2009 national convention. Like the other stories about the ISNA convention noted above, it made no mention of the hate speech or defenses of Hizballah that occurred there.

The above-mentioned items are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the State Department's promotion of Muslim Brotherhood-tied groups and other radicals. The site includes a video depicting the Dar Al Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Va. as a model of harmony and diversity, despite a longstanding history of connections between the mosque, its leadership and radicalism. Read more about Dar Al Hijrah here.

Under its International Visitor Leadership Program, the State Department continues to partner with Islamist groups linked to the Brotherhood such as the Muslim American Society. Read more about that here.

The State Department's efforts to court radical Islamists did not begin with the Obama Administration. Read IPT Executive Director Steven Emerson's testimony about the Bush Administration's performance here.

U.S. Muslim outreach since September 11 has been plagued by a bias in favor of "Saudi-funded or -supported groups with the biggest publicity machines," said Nina Shea, a member of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and senior fellow with the Hudson Institute. "All too often, the ones getting covered are the ones with grievances against the United States. Those who are pro-freedom like Zuhdi Jasser are excluded."



Pastorius said...


Christine said...


Christine said...

You do realize my post title has a double meaning, based on interpretation?

Pastorius said...

No, sorry. What's the double-meaning?

Christine said...

Evil Islam leading the blind in our government and evil government leading the blind Americans.

Pastorius said...


Epaminondas said...

Great post Christine.

I think often about why the govt fails to acknowledge that MB derived organizations represent the heart of the bad guys.

I don't think it's evil intent on the part of a few, I truly believe it is an arrogant incompetence and it strikes across party lines.

Two prime examples... Gordon England and his firing of Mr. Coughlin and his book, and simultaneous defense of Hesham England ... and Sylvestre Reyes..which was btw then BACKED UP by current secdef Gates, (D) Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee..who thought Al Qaeda a Shia organization after wondering what the Salafi:Shia ration on their 'executive' was.

When you think of the ability of people like this to overcome the good works being done by Sue Myrick, Peter King, Hoekstra and (on this subject) Chuck Schumer it's a big WTF.

We see people like Sessions and Kyl on health care, but where are they on this? They have voices. McCain? The Cheney's en masse? Giuliani? Romney?

Christine said...

I often wonder about those who [must] know the truth. Do they not speak out, due to fear? Or is it because they think it wouldn't make a difference?

That's why I am edging towards evil. Certainly not for all, but for a few. How long does the truth need to be out there, before they have crossed that evil line?

I also see those who espouse communism or socialism as evil. Who's to say, that some would not see sharia as being bad for us.