So it begins. President Obama's paid thugs are now routinely assaulting taxpayers as directed by their leader. Remember?• Obama to ACORN: "They Bring a Knife...We Bring a Gun"
• Obama to his organizers: "Get in Their Faces!"
• Obama's Alabama-area OFA organizer: "We're not looking for a fight. That will come later, when we have an army."
• Obama discussing ACORN support: "I don't want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I'm angry!"
• Obama to his paid ACORN mercenaries (on the taxpayer dime, no less):"Hit Back Twice As Hard"
In Tucson, over 1,000 anti-socialized medicine protesters peacefully assembled, quietly listening to speakers until an anti-free speech thug disrupted the meeting.The man entered the meeting shouting, screaming and shaking a sign.
The crowd was shocked.
When a man asked him to stop shouting and leave, the thug elbowed him in the face.
It looks like a clear-cut case of assault and battery to me.
A police officer removed the man from the meeting.
In Georgia, another pro-ObamaCare thug had to be threatened with a taser by police before he was arrestedfor threatening senior citizens peacefully protesting against socialized medicine.
And the precedent for tolerating voter intimidation at the polls has been set.
Folks, I'll be frank.
I don't have a good feeling about this.
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Party of Hope, Change and Beatdowns
From Doug Ross:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Lawsuits may be the way to go, but they are costly and time-consuming and about as much guarantee against violence as are restraining orders. Whatever the means, it must be made clear to the thug-in-chief that we will not back down.
Your article is well sourced and convincingly makes the argument that there is plenty of evidence for grave concern.
Whatever you do, do NOT return violence for violence. LET THE POLICE handle it.
Protect your head and face if they are kicking you.
They want to provoke you so the government has the justification to crack down on you. These are "probing" incidents, to see how we react.
We should take a page from the MLK Jr. playbook - non-violent all the way.
In DC - every single person should have a camera at the ready.
It is too bad that the DC marchers do not have training in dealing with professional provacateurs, but perhaps an e-mail could go out from the sponsoring organizations.
Ro
Thank god cops have been at all these things.
What scares me about the election is that they know that if they do their job Holder will not have their backs. We have a relatively awesome justice system and Obama and his cronies hate that.
Andy McCarthy wrote a couple of weeks ago at the Corner, "Even if Obama were a normal politician, 2012 is three years away, and he’ll worry about that later, if he has to worry at all: With his Justice Department green-lighting election fraud, ACORN and the New Black Panther party riding high, and amnesty for millions of illegal aliens on the horizon, 2012 may take care of itself."
It could get violent after that. At protests I'm fairly sure that our side won't resort to violence.
I have mixed feelings on this idea but I believe the progressives will draw first blood and in a bad way.
Especially if Obama gives in on this health scare plan. The progressives will go into a rage and take matters into their own hands.
One can have mixed feelings on whether violence may become necessary, but, in my opinion, it is not appropriate at this time. It would be a very bad idea.
I'm with Ro.
I got an e-mail back from one of the sponsors of the DC march. It states that the DC cops are aware of the threats, and they have a large number of volunteer security working the event as well.
So let's hope all is well.
As for the elections, I think we also need helpful, happy poll watchers who will escort folks in who otherwise would feel intimidated.
We will see as we get closer to the midterm elections, but we should make sure there are some helpful Repub poll watchers standin' with the Democratic poll watchers.
You can tell who the Democratic poll workers are - they are the ones with paramilitary garb and threatening demeanor! Now, if we could just get them to wear their Democratic credentials on their fetching jackets - oh, or maybe on their berets!
Ro
Post a Comment