Sunday, November 20, 2016

Donald Trump, America's First Independent President

From The Washington Post:

Viewed through any conventional lens, President-elect Donald Trump’s candidacy was improbable from start to finish. Today, two things about his victory seem to be in sharper focus: one, that Trump’s victory might best be understood as the success of the country’s first independent president, and second, that the Trump coalition may be even more uniquely his than President Obama’s has turned out to be. 
Think again about how he prevailed. There are a handful of major events during a general election that give the nominees a chance to showcase themselves, their judgment and their vision. 
One is the selection of a running mate. 
Another is the staging of the conventions. 
A third is performance in the debates. 
Hillary Clinton did better than Trump on all three tests, though Trump’s team believes the debates did not fall so decisively in her favor. 
Then there are the other factors that go into producing a successful candidacy. These include resources, the operations and mechanics of campaigning, and the skill with which candidates avoid mistakes and deal with the unexpected setbacks. 
Clinton raised more money than Trump. She had a larger number of paid staffers on the ground in the battleground states. She ran more television ads by far. 
He created needless controversies throughout the general election, while her problems were far fewer. Only in the final days did he seem surer of himself. In other words, Trump came out the loser on virtually every aspect of how campaigns are usually evaluated. 
Yet today he is staffing his administration and Clinton is still absorbing the brutal shock of having lost a race she believed was hers. 
Trump took the elements of an independent candidacy — the lack of clear ideology, the name recognition of a national celebrity and the personal fortune needed to fund a presidential campaign — and then did what no one seemed to have thought of before. He staged a hostile takeover of an existing major party. 
He had the best of both worlds, an outsider candidacy with crosscutting ideological appeal and the platform of a major party to wage the general election. By the time he had finished, he had taken down two political dynasties: the Bush dynasty in the primaries and the Clinton dynasty in the general election.


Anonymous said...

Twitter now allowing Trump donor doxxing account

Kid said...

Go Trump !

Pete Rowe said...

It missed something critical, a distinguishing feature between the two candidates: Trump loves this country.

Pastorius said...

Yes, that's an important point, but not one I would imagine the WaPo would ever be able to see.

Tim said...

He was smart not to include Christie into his circle after the election. Although, he may get thrown a morsel in the future.

thelastenglishprince said...

Christie was allowed until he appeared to be a liability due to Bridgegate. Trump knew he had to make it to the White House to be able to offer Christie anything in the future.

Pastorius said...

Christie has more problems than Bridgegate. I don't like Christie. He's the food equivalent of a full-blown alcoholic. He is ill. His temper tantrums are evidence of an addiction cycle.

Anonymous said...

Oh, this is rich . . .
CBSNews tweets:
"President-elect Trump is going to be inheriting the worse fiscal situation of any president other than President Truman..."