Monday, August 30, 2010

SPLC Redefines "Hate": Islamic Jihadists Good, Pammiecakes Bad
Mark Potok, SLPC: "With regard to monitoring radical jihadists, we have made a pragmatic decision to leave that mainly to" others


Click on the title to read the whole story over at Atlas.

I have long said I hate the SPLC. The reason? Because my own subjective observation told me they ignored the Jihad and the Jew-hate of Islam.

This proves my observation was correct.

Because of people like the SPLC piling on her, Pamela Geller is seeing a spike in death threats directed at her and her family.

I would encourage everyone to donate what you can to help out:

Death Threats and Security

In recent weeks, the Muslim Brotherhood front, Hamas funder co-conspirator CAIR has been given ongoing  nationwide exposure. They have  taken to the airwaves accusing me of leading the crusade against Muslims which is patently untrue.
Both Saturday and Sunday nights, this past weekend, Geraldo Rivera had the vile Zead Ramadan of CAIR who, yet again, made wild accusations as an incitement to violenceagainst those who oppose the Islamic supremacist Ground Zero mosque and the sharia in America.  Laura Ingraham , Bill O'Reilly, MSNBC, Chris Matthews, Keith Olberamann  and others have allowed these stealth jihadists to go on the air and gin up the jihadists by publicly accusing us of "leading the opposition to the Ground Zero mosque"  which has resulted in a spike in death threats to me and my family.
These same media outlets (Geraldo, Matthews, Ingraham, O'Reilly etc) have not given me (or Spencer) the opportunity to defend ourselves and state our case against the lying jihadists but have allowed these lies to stand unchallenged by enemies of the state.
I  oppose the Muslim Brotherhood, their proxies, and Islamic supremacists like CAIR, ISNA, ICNA, MAS, MPAC who are actively working to subvert the constitution and in a Brotherhood  internal captured document "eliminate and destroy western civilization from within" with millions contributed by the Saudis and the State department.
Why mainstream media would host these avowed enemies of the state is beyond reason.
It is now a steady stream of threats, intimidation and violent screeds.
I must increase my security. It is costly. I need your help. Badly. Please contribute something (anything!) to help me defray the costs of the new and significant expense. There is no money in what we do. Neither I nor SIOA or FDI has benefactors, donors etc. We operate on a tattered shoestring budget  but we get it done.
We use every dime that good people send to buy buses (1oK a city), taxi top (10K a city) , stage rallies etc. We need real money to stage the 911 rally against the Ground Zero mosque. If you wish your contribution to go a specific issue (ie Ground Zero rally, bus campaign,security...) Just specify. The Ground Zero rally on Septermber11th is going to need your help. The security cots for the rally will be enormous. If you want to contribute to that specifically go here: Stand with us on September 11
Help me keep me and  family safe. I can't run certain threats for obvious reasons but here's a typical sampling.
Donate using GPal
Subscribe using GPal


Anonymous said...

Imagine the uproar if threats on Pamela were instead directed at a mosque or an abortionist. The MSM, FBI, homeland security, justice dept. etc. would find the perpetrators in 5 minutes and immediately notify the UN of American human rights abuses.

Pastorius said...

Yes, good point.

Damien said...


I used to frequent Hate Watch prior to 9/11. Someone might want to point out to the guys who run Hate Watch that just because some white supremacists happen to agree with you on something, doesn't mean that you're a white supremest or that you're wrong. Off course white supremacy is still immoral, but that doesn't change the fact.

Epaminondas said...

Comment CALMLY as to their errors...


Epaminondas said...

BTW if you look at SPLC's blogroll it should be obvious that they have transmuted themselves from the good work done against real intolerance and evil to a hack's group of the political left with the leftover edge to hopefully power their dialectic, WHICH IS NOW INDISTINGUISHABLE POLITICALLY FROM THE MOST RADICAL ON THE LEFT

They cannot discriminate between a secure border and immigration policy.

They cannot discriminate between muslim intolerance and valid resistance to it.

They cannot because their political fate now lies outside the good fight and the good domain they made their fight in when they began.

Until finally, they are against those whose resistance to intolerance LEGALIZED religiously in a 'perfect document' whose inveighing against the sons of apes and pigs stands in opposition to EVERYTHING this group originally stood for

An amazing feat!

Pastorius said...

You know what I find amazing is how innovative, creative people of good will and courage build organizations like the SPLC, the Rockerfeller Foundation, and the ADL, and how after the fact, they are hijacked by Leftist maniacs who take over the money, and destroy all that was created.

How is it that this happens?

I wonder if Alinsky has an answer to that question?

Pastorius said...

The long march through the institutions.

Damien said...


I think it might have to do with whomever used to run it no longer being able to than. Than some wealthy ultra liberal comes along who finds the group's stated mission, appealing, and offers to put a lot of his money towards group, if they let him take over, and just it jus so happens that he is much further left than the people who originally ran it.

Pastorius said...

"just so happens"

No, I don't think it just so happens.

it happens too consistently for it to be simple happenstance.

Damien said...


Well these tend to be groups with goals that tend to appeal to radical leftists, that get radicalized like this. The day that the anti Jihad becomes appealing leftists, we'd have to worry about who would take over the IBA, after you quite. Of course if that day comes, Jihad and Islamic terrorism probably won't be the threat that it is today. The irony is that leftists today like to complain about racism and often label conservatives as racists, but when racism was a real problem in this country most leftists were racists as well. Now I'm not saying most leftists are really Muslim Jihadist, that would be incredibly far fetched to say the least, but they don't seem to care that much right now as a whole.