Sunday, August 29, 2010

Islam 101: Koran Verse 5:32~ A License to Kill

From Logan's Warning:

I am sure that many of us have heard Muslims make the following statement.
“To kill one innocent man or woman is to kill all of humanity; to save one human is to save all of humanity.”
When they say this they are being very deceptive. They are leaving out the most important part of the verse, which is “unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land” Here it is in its entirety.
YUSUFALI: On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land- it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our messengers with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.
Obviously “mischief in the land” is a very open statement, and “mischief” can be defined as almost anything.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary-mischief
3 a : action that annoys or irritates
As I said, this verse is a license to kill which is proven in the this video. (Video from 2009)

Here are the possible punishments for “spreading mischief”.
YUSUFALI: The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;
For the sake of our families future generations, we need to fight Sharia with all we have, otherwise they will suffer.


Damien said...


You wrote,
"For the sake of our families future generations, we need to fight Sharia with all we have, otherwise they will suffer."

I agree, but that is an understatement.

Damien said...


By the way, its things like this that really make me thank God for our constitution, especially the first amendment.

K said...

Muslims do a lot of wrong - NOT BECAUSE OF THAT VERSE.

"spreading mischief" can have have a lot of meaning.
but the word used in the Quran is "Fasad" and it is only linked to aggressive attacks that follow murder, rape and plunder

it is the Arabic equivalent to non-jihadi war where the purpose is to gain land and power through the means of armed attack.

remember islam and quran is a man made attempt at converting people to a "just" and "moral" system.

unfortunately, it is flawed and outdated.

There are loads of ahadith and rulings which cause Muslims to adopt the Shariah and oppress people.

he fault of Islam is not they want to kill the world or commit terror (that is what the media tells you)

the real fault is the shariah that they want to implement shariah, ban and forbid dissension and impede scientific progress.

islamists are scam artists that try to play the role of heroes at the time of recruitment but in stead are promoting dogma.

these feeble nonsensical attacks are laugable.

the real evil of islam is a lot deeper than this.

islam is a very refined deception. it is not the rough blatant murder book like the bible.

islam poses as a peaceful religion and its real teeth are the shariah which is vile and brutal.

you will not find any fault in the quran save its brutal punishments for brutal acts and its nonscientific view of creation and the structure of the universe. you will also note that it is filled repetitive nonsense about past history - mostly about moses.

but that verse you quoted is just not what is wrong with islam

I can tell you loads of stuff that is wrong with islam and it is these loads of filth that we need expose.

your attempts are only revealing the true source of these attempts - a desperate zionist attempt at maligning islam done wrong

Alexander Münch said...

Ahlan Ya Khurram !
Kif HalaK?
Kul Quwayes?
Al Hamdulila !

===" I can tell you loads of stuff... "=== etc.

Please... Please... - PLEASE DO !



Pastorius said...

Everything Khurram says supersedes anything anyone else says. If you say, "The sky is blue," Khurram will say, "Oh, but the fact that the sky is blue is not the important part. Sure, the sky is blue, but you can not imagine how blue the sky is, until you have see the sky with my eyes, which not only tell me the sky is blue, but tell me, at the same time, why the sky is blue. To say the sky is blue is dogma. TO KNOW THE SKY IS BLUE IS TO KNOW THAT I, KHURRAM, HAVE SEEN THAT THE SKY IS BLUE."

Until one can grok the above sentence, one will not be able to understand anything Khurram says.

Endless arguing with Khurram will never achieve anything, because Khurram is not arguing your point. He is arguing the point that NOTHING IS A POINT UNTIL KHURRAM CONCEIVES IT AS A POINT.