Thursday, January 28, 2010

The State of the Union? Ask the Voters in Massachusetts

boring_and_carter.jpgIn an address punctuated by a crazy call for increased drilling (Sarah Palin anyone?) I was struck, before being put into a sleep deep enough for a root canal, by a wonder that if George Soros was taking a hike on this guy, and Hillary was busy doing her hair, WHAT WAS NEXT?

It's hard to fathom he could be done.

I can't accept that.

But amid his calls to fight, fight, fight prior to this speech, and his stunningly inaccurate statement on the recent SCOTUS decision and demagogic smear of the justices AT SOTU, .. he just seemed deflated before the botoxed semi rictus of Pelosi's smile and the vapid dentifriced ketamine like gaze of Biden.

But he cannot be all done.

Can he? Not buying it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Anonymous said...

I couldn't even watch it. I decided to watch Joy Behar gossip and denegrate conservatives, instead, knowing that I could read about it later.

Today, reports that we are paying off the Taliban! Infidel tax? (I refuse to use their words. It only adds to world Islmatization. So it is not "j**za," it is infidel tax. It is not a "h*j*b," it is a headscarf, got it? We should not use their words!!! Also pretty disturbed about the US Air Flight where a woman reports suspicious activity only to be ignored. I can't handle what I'm reading on a daily basis. Couldn't even look at him last night. How did he get there?

Pastorius said...

I see your point.

If you write a short piece on your idea, I'll post it here.

I think it is an idea worth discussing.

Anonymous said...

Thank you. I think it's an important topic to get out there.

I'll try and work on it.


Glen at TROP is also giving my agurment some thought. Yes, we should all think seriously about their terminology.

How would I submit any essay to you? I've looked quickly, but see no way of getting it you without replying to a post? I respect your privacy and would never want to do anything to compromise the wonderful work you and Paul:) are doing. He's Paul right? You're John? I am the Walrus:)

Pastorius said...

Yeah, I'm John, cuz I'm the one with the Asian wife.


You can email me at

Pastorius said...

By the way, that's interesting that you may be changing the minds of two guys who blog on this subject every freaking day of their lives.

You may really be on to something.

If it was just me, that would be one thing.

Problem we have here is this whole blog is predicated on taking their terminology and shoving it back in their faces. We are called "Infidel" Bloggers Alliance, after all.

Maybe we should change our name to Crusaders Alliance.

Reliapundit wrote to me last night and suggested we start calling ourselves "Crew Satyrs."


sa·tyr (str, str)
1. often Satyr Greek Mythology A woodland creature depicted as having the pointed ears, legs, and short horns of a goat and a fondness for unrestrained revelry.
2. A licentious man; a lecher.

midnight rider said...

Well, we certainly fit # 2.

Pastorius said...

I do like the name.

I don't think we ought to rebrand ourselves at this point.


midnight rider said...

No, no rebranding. Infidel is not an Islam word. We used it to describe them during the Crusades themselves.

By the way, anon. you can also send stuff to me (Paul) (Saul?) at . Send your submissions to us both, one of us will see it.

Anonymous said...

10/4. I will try and work on getting my thoughts into a coherent argument. I definitely don't like the word creep, it's part of the whole shitlamization process, imo.

Also, I like Infidel Blogger's Alliance and agree that infidel is not an Islamic term.