Saturday, October 20, 2007

CounterJihad Brussels 2007

From the press release:
The first day of the Counterjihad Brussels 2007 conference was held in the European Parliament, and the second day of working groups was held in the Flemish Parliament....
Check out Pamela Geller's report, which includes Robert Spencer's speech on video and other resources.


Anonymous said...


The primary objective of all Muslims is to spread Islam throughout the globe by whatever means may be necessary, including lying and killing. Killing kuffars (unbelievers) who resist Islam is not a sin, in fact it is the only sure way of attaining paradise. Kuffars who do not resist must be either enslaved (dhimmis) or converted to Islam.

So, with the current Jihad in the West, how does this Islamic program of killing/enslavement/conversion apply to kuffar kids?

The first wave of attacks in the present Jihad mostly killed adults, though there were a few children incinerated on the 9/11 flights. It was only with the deliberate torturing and killing of kuffar children at Beslan that the civilised world realised that Muslims worship Allah in the same way that the abominators worshipped Moloch.
In addition, many of the Beslan children were humiliated by being raped and forced to drink their own urine before being killed. Humiliation of the kuffar is very important in Islam.

Muslim theologians have called for the sacrifice of 2 million American children to Allah, and recent events in Scotland seem to show that children in the U.K. are also prime targets for attack. Jihadists tortured, castrated and murdered a fifteen year old , and the failed Glasgow airport attack was timed for the first day of the school holidays with the obvious intention of burning as many families as possible.

It is rather disconcerting to realise that this attack appears to have been carried out by doctors, especially as the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association are on record as stating that their duty of care does not extend to kuffars.
How many of these Doctors of Death have access to childrens wards?

In summary: a jihadist who believes that killing kuffars will get him to Allah's bordello in the sky doesn't care whether his victims are men, women or children. All kuffar human-sacrifices are equally pleasing to Allah.

The Islamic abduction, rape and sexual subjugation of young kuffar girls may be new to our generation with the comparatively recent cultural enrichment of our cities, but this typical Muslim practice goes back into history, and the West has suffered from it before.

Of course every culture produces child molesters, but in non-Muslim societies these are usually isolated loners. In contrast, Muslim pedophiles are well-organised and these predators often hunt their prey in rape-gangs in a tradition of Muslim razzia going back to the 'prophet'. The reason for this cultural difference is that pedophilia and rape are abhorrent in civilised societies, but are socially acceptable to Muslims because they are dutifully following Mohammed's example.

As well as being after our children's bodies, either as burned and mangled sacrifices to Allah or living sex-slaves, they are also determined to brainwash our children's minds with their vile cult.

A favorite trick is 'role playing' to indoctrinate young children to think of themselves as Muslims.

In addition, there is an insidious program to destroy our children's cultural heritage , with attempts to abolish festivals loved by generations of kuffar children and put Islamic events in their place.

British Muslims are demanding a ban within state schools on music, dance, drama, biology, swimming and lessons about any other religion but Islam. There are also to be compulsory history lessons about the 'massive contribution that Islam has made to the development of Western civilisation'. In fact, Islamic culture is so backward that Muslims are incapable of bringing anything new to the West. The West has long ago moved on from its medieval phase and few citizens of Western countries (apart from immigrant Muslims) would want to return to it. All the things that Muslims have brought to our civilisation are negative and barbaric. However, don't expect historical accuracy to stand in the way of implementing a politically correct curriculum.

So, unless present trends can be reversed, the only foreseeable future for our children will be death, dhimmitude or conversion.

Pastorius said...

Mark my words, as long as this movement is defined as a "counter-Jihad" movement, and not as a pro-freedom, or pro-Western democracy movement, it will be a failure.

The influence of Robert Spencer also does not bode well. He is a supremely negative person. While I respect the likes of Spencer, Steyn, and Fjordman, all three of them have basically told us we are on an inveitable course towards destruction.

That is not how one wins.

That is not how Abraham Lincoln won the Civil War. And, it is not how Winston Churchill won WWII.

Always On Watch said...

I understand what you're saying about defeatism. However, at this point in the struggle (and we're early on with regard to the West's understanding the significance of the threat), division amongst us is problematic. Political change is absolutely necessary for victory.

I don't see Spencer as negative as you do. I DO see him as having been immersed in watching the oncoming train-wreck for 20 years. In my observation, the longer the observer, the more negative he feels.

I watched the video of Spencer's speech in Brussels and didn't feel that it was negative to the core.

We are still milling around a lot in this movement, whatever you want to call it. We're doing a lot of preaching to the choir. How do we get beyond those problems? Is there anything we can DO to get beyond the problems, or are we at the mercy of another spectacular attack in that such an attack is what it will take for most Westerners to understand the gravity of the situation? I think about that a lot.

I'd also point out that the Brussels summit had a second day about which we don't know the details. I have to hope for that second day being positive.

Mark said...

I think there is a lot of truth in what you say, Always, that we are preaching to the choir. In many ways, people who read these blogs are often convinced of the problems we face anyway. We simply must get the message out to a wier audience. If we don't, the West is sunk.

WATCHER71 said...

The question is how to get that message out..? Our own state authorities effectively prohibit lawful protest leaving unlawful action as the only option...Is the average Joe really ready to go against state authorities..? Especially in an environment when he doesn't have any guns...? I think if the state were to give the go ahead....well all would be different....the state needs to declare war on Islam....and let us have the open war that is coming....with the support of the people defending our way of life. Of course the state will never do that as the flow of oil would rapidly dry up.....perhaps things would be different if we were not dependent on oil....