Unbelievable: UN 'human rights council' calls for boycott of US companies, arrest of their employees
Well, now the UN is paying back President Hussein Obama for his devotion to the 'human rights council.' On Thursday, the council called for boycotting American companies that do business with Israel. That includes companies like Motorola, Hewlett Packard and Caterpillar. It also includes companies based in Britain, France, Mexico, Israel and others. Really (Hat Tip: Lance K).
The Free Beacon has obtained a report soon to be released by the United Nations that calls for an international campaign of legal attacks and economic warfare on a group of American companies that do business in Israel, including Hewlett-Packard, Caterpillar Inc., and Motorola Solutions Inc.
In a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon, the Anti-Defamation League’s Abraham Foxman blasted the report and the HRC’s special rapporteur: “We believe you should have prevented the Secretariat from being a party to Mr. Falk’s anti-Israel agenda. Mr. Falk’s entire tenure as Special Rapporteur has served to undermine the credibility of the institution of the United Nations.”
The report attempts to instigate a campaign of boycott, divestment, sanctions, and legal action against a litany of international companies doing business in Israel. In addition to American companies, the U.N. targets include major European firms such as Veolia Environnement, Group 4 Security, the Dexia Group, the Volvo Group.
“The costs to companies and businesses of failing to respect international humanitarian law are considerable,” the report warns, “including damage to a company’s public image, impact on shareholder decisions and share price and could result in employees being criminally responsible for rights abuses.”But wait - it gets worse.
The report warns American employees of targeted companies that they face legal risks.Mitt Romney should call now for the US to withdraw from the 'human rights council' and should pledge to withdraw immediately should he become President. Enough is enough.
“Employees of companies can face investigation and prosecution for human rights violations committed irrespective of where the violation was committed.”
In addition to legal action against American employees of targeted companies, the Special Rapporteur “concludes that all companies that operate in or otherwise have dealings with Israeli settlements should be boycotted.” The companies should ”be prepared to accept any consequences—reputation, financial, or legal—of continuing operations.”
Should the companies continue doing business in Israel, the Human Rights Council “calls on civil society to actively pursue legal and political redress against non-complying business” and “to vigorously pursue initiatives to boycott, divest and sanction the businesses highlighted in this report” and “calls on the international community to consider requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice” to punish the businesses.
Pres Barack HUSSEIN Obama issued a proclamation observing United Nations Day 2012, urging all U.S. governors to do the same
(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama issued a proclamation observing United Nations Day 2012, urging all U.S. governors to do the same.
“I urge the Governors of the 50 States, and the officials of all other areas under the flag of the United States, to observe United Nations Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities,” the presidential proclamation said.PASTORIUS COMMENT:
IT MAKES SENSE THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WOULD CELEBRATE UN DAY. AFTER ALL, WE AS A NATION ARE INVOLVED IN THE UNITED NATIONS. IT IS PART OF OUR DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS TO FORM RELATIONSHIPS AND SOLVE PROBLEMS OVER TIME.
BUT THE GOVERNORS OF OUR STATES HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE UNITED NATIONS. STATES ARE NOT PART OF THE NATIONAL DIPLOMATIC EFFORT. STATES ARE INVOLVED IN THE BUSINESS OF THE STATES, NOT OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
THERE IS NO PURPOSE FOR INDIVIDUAL STATES TO BE PROMOTING THE UNITED NATIONS, MUCH LESS PARTICIPATING IN ANY UN EFFORTS.
IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION IN SOME WAY (OF IT'S SPIRIT, IF NOT IT'S LETTER).