On 9/16/12 American Thinker ran the
article “A Plan to Stop the Islamization of the World is at Hand.”
This article heartily praised the organization Stop the Islamization of the
World (SION) as the world’s leading anti-Jihad organization. And it
lauded the inaugural meeting of SION’s International Freedom of Speech Congress (IFSC) held on
9/11/12.
However, it was argued that the IFDC would
have more impact if their meetings supplemented the focus on speeches with
policy formation. As such, my American Thinker article proposed 11 policy
planks that the IFSC could consider. After 175 comments many were
revised, deleted and added. Here are the 21 policy ideas that we, the American
Thinker community, think the IFSC should consider adopting as policy.
We believe the IFSC should:
1) Stand for the immediate
halt of immigration by Muslims into western nations.
2) Denounce the violation of any
rights or the harassment of any peaceful Muslim citizens in the West.
3) Reclassify Islam from a religion to a
political organization for the purposes of law.
4) Call for an investigation
into the CAIR and other Islamic advocacy groups under the Foreign Agent
Registration Act.
5) Undertake regular inventories of
mosques in the West to look for pro-violence materials. Furthermore, we support
surveillance of mosques where more than 5 % of the materials advocate violence.
6) Close down any mosque which
advocates Jihad.
7) Call for the immediate investigation
into foreign mosque funding in the West. And, proposes to make foreign funding
of mosques in non-Islamic nations illegal.
8) Oppose the use as spiritual mentors in
prisons by any person associated with either mosques that advocate violence or
terror affiliated organizations.
9) Initiate deportation hearings against
non-citizens who promote Jihad in our nations.
10) Make clear that we oppose the cultural
blindness of multiculturalism and are not racist, the IFDC promotes the words “culturism” (the opposite of
multiculturalism) and “culturist.”
Recognizing the importance of diversity, announce that we are a culturist
movement, not a racist one.
11) Support culturist profiling at
airports and in hiring practices when national security and public safety could
be compromised.
12) Require curriculum to describe the
violent tactics of Muhammad and the 1,400-year conflict between Islam and
non-Islamic nations and peoples. This curriculum should also be used in
museums and memorials which touch upon the topic of Islam.
13) Make the foreign funding of Islamic
Studies departments and faculty positions in our universities illegal.
14) Advocate that we not accept students
from Islam dominated countries to enter into any fields of study which would
endanger national security or be used to military purposes.
15) Adopt the policy of disproportionate
response whenever our property or citizens are harmed.
16) Support a culturist foreign policy
wherein we make decisions that take cultural affiliation into account. We
must side against Muslims who are ethnically cleansing Christians.
17) Call for a halt of foreign aid to
Islamic nations.
18) Demand
the revoking of UN resolution 16/18 and any other resolutions that might limit
the freedom of speech.
19) Either lobby to have the UN to declare
all Jihad a crime against humanity or totally withdraw from the UN and ask it
to relocate to another nation.
20) Recommend that nations pursue a policy
of energy independence with the aim of defunding Islamic expansion.
21) Prohibit the use of Sharia-based law
or practices in any western court, nation, or any government functions in said
nations.
The preceding suggestions do not represent
the official policy of SION or the IFSC. Neither do each of these
policies represent the views of the forum moderator, John K. Press. We
recognize that the leadership of IFSC will formulate policy on behalf of the
IFSC. And, if the IFSC formulates policies, we rank-and-file Jihad
activists will ultimately enthusiastically support the final policy platform.
We hope that they do.
Dr. Press is the author of the book Culturism:
A Word, A Value, Our Future. He is also the inspiration behind the
British political movement the National
Culturists.
1 comment:
Despite OIC rhetoric, the poor human rights record and poor record of religious tolerance of many OIC countries comes as no surprise to the intelligent and informed observer. The OIC admits in its own 1990 Cairo Declaration that all human rights are subject to sharia, and this of course would include freedom of religion. Article 24 of the Declaration clearly states:
“All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari’ah.”
That is a huge get out clause to ensure that any actual human rights that are endorsed elsewhere in the document to deceive the stupid, are clearly and decisively abrogated. Human rights according to shari’ah are not human rights according to the actual understood meaning of the term. It is also a get out clause for the reasonably sounding United Nations resolution 16/18 because by the OIC’s own documents such resolutions are ‘subject to the Islamic Shari’ah’ and therefore rendered meaningless in terms of the way it is understood in the West.
Clearly sharia is inconsistent with human rights and this was been recognised by the European Court of Human Rights in 2003 the following is taken from its Annual Report of that year:
“In Refah Partisi,it carried out a thorough examination of the relationship between the Convention, democracy, political parties and religion, and found that a sharia-based regime was incompatible with the Convention, in particular, as regards the rules of criminal law and procedure, the place given to women in the legal order and its interference in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts.”
Post a Comment