Friday, December 28, 2007

Suicide By Islam

In the United States, we have an expression:

"Suicide by cop."

We use that expression when some junkie decides to take himself out by committing some meaningless crime, often resulting in a car chase which ends with the police shooting the idiot to death.

The car chases are often broadcast on television where they serve as dramatic reminders of America's gluttony for buffoonery and the absurd.

Europe has its own flair for the dramatic. However, whereas idiocy reigns in the personal suicides of America, Europe is absolutely serious; Europe really wants to die, on a macro-level, and
they are using their Muslim immigrants to pull the trigger:

An analysis from former Ambassador Christian Lambert, writing at Les 4 Vérités, predicts a terrible fate for Europe. He titles his essay, "The Inexorable Suicide of Europe."

The Brussels administration admits officially that each year some 550,000 immigrants from Africa, the Middle East and China, plus South America, enter the European Union. In reality the figure is twice that, in other words, more than a million.

We will briefly take it country by country.

Italy wins the prize right now. For this to become known, a young Italian girl had to be raped and murdered by a Gypsy. Then Rome was forced to reveal that Italy, a country even more poorly governed than France, which is saying a lot, now has 3.7 million immigrants (the official figure), that 700,000 new arrivals were recorded in 2006, and that 560,000 Gypsies have settled there. More than 100,000 of them arrived in the ten-month period after January 1, 2007.

More than 50% of the crime in Italy is due to these "Rumanians". In addition, every year some 60,000 immigrants from Tunisia and Libya (where even Colonel Qadhafi admits that his country is invaded by Sub-Saharians waiting to get into Europe and certain to succeed in their goal) arrive in Italy via the island of Lampedusa. In general, it is easy to enter Europe through Italy where the administration is "lax"...

In Greece, it's worse and Cyprus is one of the great doors of entry into Europe.

In France, nothing has changed. It can be assumed that 350,000 new arrivals enter our country each year, 70% of them from Africa. The number of visas granted has not lessened. It is still more than 2 million - 2,038,000 in 2006 - which proves that the fight against massive immigration is, like all the rest, purely verbal.

While I'm on the topic, I should note in passing that the town of Aulnay-sous-Bois, in Seine-Saint-Denis, has just experienced 4 days and nights of street fighting between gangs of "Afro-Maghrebins" and the police, according to the press itself. At Villiers-le-Bel, Val d'Oise, it is even more serious. The police, attacked with rifles, proved to be impotent. In order to quell these riots military units specializing in street fighting are now necessary, especially since stockpiles of war weapons from the Balkans are being stashed in the suburbs.

In Germany there are 4 million Turks, and new arrivals every day. One German told me that Islamist Turks feel more at ease practicing their religious activities in Germany than in Muslim Turkey.

In Great Britain, 50 powerful Muslim associations control millions of faithful followers, mostly Pakistanis. In the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, beneath the smile of her gracious very Christian Majesty, there are now koranic schools where children can learn to become kamikazes and blow up automobiles.

In the Netherlands where there are many North African, Caribbean and Indonesian Muslims serious trouble is on the increase. The press writes that the situation is becoming "à la française", in other words: pillaged shops, torched cars, violent confrontations with the police.

Scandinavia is not to be left out where, in order to be in tune with the times, Norway discovered and recruited, as a government minister, a black woman from Martinique.

I might add that there is no common European policy on immigration. Spain and Italy amnestied millions of illegals - a tremendous message for others - without even informing their neighbors.

On the other hand, in the countries of Eastern Europe, there are no immigrants. Why? Because these countries were subjected to communism and are therefore underdeveloped, with no welfare state or free hand-outs, housing, health care or schools.

Some say that one must not exaggerate. The great invasions from the 4th to 7th centuries eventually worked themselves out, didn't they? Great ignorance. We have to realize that these invasions had only a limited effect on the population of nascent France. As a matter of fact, in general, gangs of invaders and vandals, totaling only a few thousand individuals did not settle down in France, except for the Franks to the East. Furthermore, these barbarians quite rapidly converted to Christianity, more precisely to arianism.

It is true that at the time the merovingian monarchy did not distribute to these barbarians welfare of all kinds, declaring: "You are a great opportunity for France. Come, all of you, and join us with your large and beautiful families." No. Back then, people still had common sense.

And now, what will happen? In the short term, immigration will continue to flood in. Problems which have never been this serious will continue to spread and worsen. In the very long term, Europe, which created the most beautiful civilization that humanity has ever produced, will disappear.

When the barbarians converted to Christianity they helped create the Europe that is now being dismantled. The Franks also routed the Muslims who are now getting their revenge, without much of a fight, while mosques are rising everywhere on the European landscape to replace magnificent structures like this one. The cliché "what goes around comes around" seems to apply to our current situation. We must count on the unexpected now.

The suicide of Europe is not unavoidable - there are many solutions. The fact that there are no leaders willing to do what must be done is the problem. Another strange fact is that so many people seem to "sense" that this is inevitable, as if they have an insight, or an intuition, that Europe's time has come. These are the people besotted by what they see on television and dumbed down by an inferior education. They turn a commentary such as this article into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

That being said, I want to note that, other than the 560,000 "Rumanians" who are noted to be inflicting Italy, all of this damage is being done by people from predominently Muslim countries. In short, the problems originate with Muslims.

Those who support political parties like the Vlaams Belang and the BNP believe that "immigration" is to blame for the problems of Europe. This is not true, according to any evidence that I have ever been able to find.

Instead, Europe's problems are caused by Muslims. Yes, they are immigrants, but the problem is not that they immigrated. The problem is that they are Muslims. If they were Chinese people, or Indians, or even Pakistani Christians, there would be very little problem, and any problems which might exist would be solved by assimilation over a generation or two.

But, the problem is Islam.

If Islam were not the problem, then the evidence would show that the violence comes from people other than Muslims. However, there is no evidence to support any other idea. If anyone has any, then please give it to me.


Anonymous said...

From the article is this quote:

"On the other hand, in the countries of Eastern Europe, there are no immigrants. Why? Because these countries were subjected to communism and are therefore underdeveloped, with no welfare state or free hand-outs, housing, health care or schools."

That may well be true, but circumstances changed a week ago with the expansion of the Schengen Treaty. See this link for details and map which now depicts Eurabia's Schengen visa free zone reaches all the way to Russia's borders.

European nations bring down the last remnants of the Iron Curtain on Friday when they form a vast free-movement zone embracing 24 countries from Spain to Estonia. Nine mostly eastern European EU members will join Schengen, erasing internal border controls for some 400 million Europeans. A news report.

Apparently, the European suicide pact is a done deal. They've rolled out the blood red carpet.

Citizen Warrior said...

Calling the European problem an "immigration" problem is similar to calling the jihad problem a "terrorist" problem. It obscures the real problem, which makes it more difficult to have a productive public debate.

Good article, Pastorius. And a damn good point. Islam is the problem. Let's stop calling it immigration.

WATCHER71 said...

Good post Pas...and the answer is, as I have been calling for all along, an end to all Islamic immigration,Asylum,humanitarian aid etc...or if we in extreme circumstances allow a female Muslim Asylum...(which I think we should) she cannot bring anyone other than her children in with her, she can't marry from the old country and bring them in etc...Which ever way we turn the intricacies of the solution are fraught with ethical problems but overall the answer has to be a complete ban on allowing more Muslims in. In a sense your right about this feeling of inevitability of war on our streets, even ethnic cleansing. As ever we will forget the issue (Islam) and go after those who belong to a different ethnicity. Me I'm getting tooled up and then getting out.

Michael Travis said...

Immigration id the problem. In most cases it is bad for the host country (US, Britain, etc.) and worse for the homeland (Mexico, Israel, Jordan, Ivory Coast..). by using the West as an overflow valve these countries have managed to avoid confronting vital social issues and have sidestepped implementing true representative democratic frameworks.....and instead, strengthened their institutionalised system of corruption.

I have seen it and I have lived it. I used to believe in open borders and the free flow of other people and cultures (especially to the US and Britain...whose food, culture, and women, for the most part, are 3rd rate in my opinion.)..I have personally seen the result in Mexico, Central America, Africa, and the Middle East. These regions are far worse for the open borders policies of the West. There has been no incentive for change, at least for the better. The Americans on the other hand (not individual "good guys" such as Pastorius and myself of course) led by the US Chamber of Commerce and the Wal-Mart types...merely lust for cheap labour and and a workforce that is blindly unaware of our societal cornerstones i.e. The Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights (unfortunately this ignorance is like a plague, infecting folks who seem to think that Paul Revere is merely a brand of cheap pots and pans). The thirst for cheap labour used to be referred to as endless, indentured sub-class, beholden to their Masters. We fought several wars to rid our country of such ideas.

If Mexico, Israel, Jordan and other countries did not have the emigration overflow valve of Western immigration they would rise up and end the corruption that has ruined their lives. Instead....the move to the San Fernando Valley,,,leaving their Homeland to the despots and criminals.

Michael Travis said...

Wow! Sorry for the typos...I have just woke-up and I'm still a bit groggy.


Pastorius said...

That's a very good point, and one I have never previously considered. The most tenacious and brave citizens are the ones who up and leave their various countries (not the case with Mexico) and hightail it to the United States. That is a very bad thing for their countries of origin.

By the way, yeah, I agree American women are 3rd rate.


Pastorius said...

Oh, by the way, Michael, I don't concede the entirety of the point. The problem is Islam. I certainly do not expect to have to take up arms against Viet Namese immigrants. Do you?

Pastorius said...

Sadly, I must say, I'm glad to hear you're going to leave the UK.

Epaminondas said...

Immigration itself is NOT the problem. From ~1890-1915 the USA took in by % AND numbers way more than we have recently, even illegally.

It's the IMPORTATION by the host state of missing labor which is the problem (THAT should scarify the greedy business interests backing illegal immigration here and amnesty for those who are here now). Those imported have nothing at stake in becoming assimilated. They aren't wanted, they are needed for unter-tasks. Then when they are not accepted, or when the fact that they have no stake in the new country is compounded with Qutbite islam State within a state. Sharia within the west.

All europe has to do is stop all immigration and insist that the price of citizenship is the adoption of national historic values, but the quid pro quo is complete economic and social mobility. The latter is something europe has not succeeded at with it's own citizens.

WATCHER71 said...

'All europe has to do is stop all immigration and insist that the price of citizenship is the adoption of national historic values, but the quid pro quo is complete economic and social mobility. The latter is something europe has not succeeded at with it's own citizens.'

That is very true, I read something recently that said the UK has the worst social mobility in the world. That the Uk has social mobility akin to the 1950's....I agree although find it hard to believe the Uk's is the worst in th entire world, what about the developing world? Still the point is valid.

Pastorius said...

Having known several Americans who have moved to the UK as Sales Managers only to end up running large corporations, it is hard for me to believe the UK has low social mobility.

I think that is a bullshit anti-Western assertion.

Epaminondas said...

"several Americans"..therein lies the rub.

substitute .. xxxxx with low educational back ground, but a high work ethic and where are we...

more...England is not quite as bad as the rest of europe, especially where the cousins are concerned..God Save the Queen, luv

WATCHER71 said...

WATCHER71 said...

It is a problem.

Epaminondas, 'substitute .. xxxxx with low educational back ground, but a high work ethic and where are we...'

I take it your saying we have a low work ethic? Lower than the average American worker? Am I getting you right?

Epaminondas said...

No, not at all, I am saying an immigrant of identifiably different national back ground and or color from a 'briton', with low educational back ground, but YET with an (invisibly) high work ethic is in a different position with rgd to social mobility and economic mobility despite any level of brilliance than an arriving professional american who in the end is a visitor, not a prospective british citizen.

WATCHER71 said...

Oh OK Epaminondas, Sorry I took you wrong. I think that's very insightful. I don't think its anti western to say it either. My attitude is identify a something about it and for the UK it is an issue (IMHO) more so than for the US (and that's admiration.) My career path would have been a lot...quicker in the US. I pitch it in as a contribution to the debate in that it is a factor in the equation for the UK as to going some of the way in explaining the isolationism and consequential radicalising of British Muslims.

magnus said...

Hi Pastorious.

I blogged the Lambert-article, with som critics. I too think he's too much pessimism on immigration, and almost some racist comments. But his article is anyway in total a relevant description of Europe and the threat we now face.

I agree with you to the point that Islam is the big problem, but a too large immigration can/may also be a problem. The multiculturalism without limits may very well be an utopia, don't you think?

Do we even yet know the importance of some level of consistency in culture?

To target Muslims only may also be a non-feasable way... I don't know if an immigration where Muslims is rejected selectively is allowed. I guess it is prohibited by the nowadays very important Human Rights (**).

(** I'm not against HR, but there are those in in social science that claims that HR is our new religion and that this has not only positive implications; HR as something devine, despite it is by humans defined rules. Shouldn't they rather be treated as such?)

Pastorius said...

Yes, I think there is too much immigration in Western countries. There is too much of a flood of new entries. They move into neighborhoods which are no different from the country they came from. They don't learn the language or the culture. They have no allegiance to our countries. And, this is all because there are so many of them that they do not have to communicate with us.

However, our main problem is Islam. I think we need to deal with the biggest problem first.

The other problem will not require killing.

Citizen Warrior said...

Another point, Magnus, is that immigration is already selective. We take specified amounts of people from certain countries. There are quotas and upper limits. There are limits on accepting criminals.

So all that would be needed is to extend or alter the existing limits. The only problem I can see with that is that first enough non-Muslims would have to be informed to be okay with limiting people from that specific religion. Right now I'm sure there would be a big stink about it.

In a few years, if we do our jobs right, there won't be much resistance to the idea.