ISIS acts to kill Americans and Democrats not only polarize the nation in a nonsensical way, they FORCE the issue into their dialectic.
there was no tragedy in Orlando. There was a military attack carried
out by a saboteur enemy terrorist, whose specific target was Americans
Civilians. That’s why Disney was scouted.
HAMAS blows up Sbarro.
HAMAS shoot up a Mall.
HAMAS blows up a Passover Seder (with cyanide involved, btw)
and Islamic Fundamentalism causes attacks in Orlando, San Bernadino, Ft
Hood, North Carolina, Seattle, and ps >> NYC, PA, and DC AMONG OTHERS
is the reality. If the Sig Sauer was not available the enemy terrorist
would have blown himself to bits, or walked in with 8 loaded Glock 19′s
or 22′s and 20 reloads and fired away with both hands.
This is not some nut with mommy’s weapons. It was a military operation by a single enemy terrorist (we think).
to the Democrats the facts are an inconvenience. This world MUST exist
only through the mind’s eye of their world theory of how things work.
Therefore this is a gun murder and the solution is an anti gun solution.
And they shut down the House and divide the nation over their dialectic.
the senate BY ONE VOTE did not pass a bill which would have given the
FBI the authority to examine remotely, your browser history WITHOUT A
COURT ORDER.(PS Ted Cruz, the Constitutionalism expert, voted YEA). Will
we be searching histories to allow us to gain our own rights soon?
Conduct ‘certain types’ of interstate business? Be denied certain
licenses or certifications?
I am an American who happens to be
Jewish, and I blog, and I have been threatened. I would not be overly
SHOCKED to find my name on a ‘list’, now or later. Does this mean I
SHOULD HAVE a weapon or my having a weapon means I am a threat to
Americans who happen to be Muslims who are minding their own business
and see Islamic Fundamentalism and want to throw up? Who decides? Some
people who are the type that gave Nidal Hassan glowing fitness reports,
or fired Stephen Coughlin? On what basis will the decision be made?
three day waiting period a five day waiting period, a new star chamber
to create a no gun list, would only have DELAYED this attack by days AT
MOST, and created a new way to attack, or method to obtain a gun at
What difference does any of this make when the FBI is told
OVER and OVER and OVER that this enemy terrorist may be an enemy
terrorist and they either cannot at or will not act (as if there is a
We are currently witnessing a sit-in by Democrats
which no doubt proves in the their own echo chambered minds, that
similar to Chris Murphy’s broken brain, the republicans don’t care if
they sell guns to ISIS.
Missing from any of them in this lockstep
lemming parade is a SINGLE thought about who the enemy terrorist really
is and represents, how to stop and kill them WHERE THEY ARE INSPIRED,
and how to WIN THIS WAR.
This war is against the USA’s people
having guns, in their minds, and winning means we accept we are bad and
only certain few of us get them, and they will decide who that is, by
their own criteria.
I don’t care about the
civilian casualties where these enemy terrorist attackers are built
mentally, anymore than I would have cared about the civilians in the
Ruhr, or Nagoya in 1941-45.
There are many people, experts,
smart and studious people, such as Tom Nichols, who think ISIS etc can
never be an existential threat to the USA.
But in the fallout, and
in the reaction to these threats to our daily lives we can see the
roots of dissolution, national enmity here, and finally violence to
enforce the domestic political policies in response. The democrats have
shut down the house to enforce their will on guns. Suppose the
republicans there called for local political support on the Mall to show
The mujahedin in Afghanistan were not an existential to the USSR, were they?
The history of self government tells us that our societies fail by suicide. Some quickly.
the Democrats the USA MUST BE a violent nation, because we are a
violent people, with a violent history, and does evil and violent things
because we were flawed at birth.
In their heightened
consciousness ‘love and compassion’ will keep us together and safe as we
overcome our collective id, by heeding their leadership to a better
place. The USA is bad, and we must take away those items which make us
so. GUNS, PROFIT, BUSINESS, and substitute for that our obeisance to the
inevitable end of individual professionalism and individual success
which have unethically made the USA the principal aggressor in the
Those who oppose this on principle are ridiculed as
marching around with ‘tri-cornered hats’, or pilloried as evil gun nuts,
bitter ended bible thumpers, and suspected of being racist recidivists
who don’t care if enemy terrorists in the USA have guns as long as they
Is there ANYONE who thinks FDR, HST, JFK, HHH, LBJ could have supported what is going on in their party right now?
SHAME JOHN LEWIS
SHAME CHRIS MURPHY
SHAME STENY HOYER
Excellent. Btw has anyone wondered whether individually or collectively if the IBA bloggers are on that 8000 Americans ISIS list?
I've wondered a bit.
But I think if we were, we would know. I think SOMEONE would have told us. If not the FBI, then I think someone else who does what we do would have told us.
Obviously Pamela and Robert and Bosch would be on that list.
Edward Cline, who is a friend of friends, is on that list.
We are currently witnessing a sit-in by Democrats
They are making fools of themselves -- and driving some who typically vote Democratic either to sit out this election or vote for Trump.
BTW, they were feasting on a buffet during the sit-in and sitting on pink-striped pillows.
Why The Democrats Are Pushing Gun Control Even Though They Know It's Pointless and Likely a Political Loser
Damage control. Also squirrel!
The possibility that terrorist attacks might shift the electoral terrain in Donald Trump's favor has been one of Democrats' biggest worries since he emerged as the presumptive nominee.
...More broadly, both experimental and real-world studies have tended to show that in the US and abroad, the major party with a more hawkish reputation usually benefits when international terror becomes a major concern.
...In that context, focusing the political argument on gun regulation rather than Omar Mateen's admiration for ISIS or questions around Muslim immigration to the United States is a strategic win. Democrats may not win many votes with thin gruel, poll-tested gun control proposals, but they aren't going to lose any.
I personally know a few Dems and independents who are fed up and won't vote this time around. Two factors driving them away before this inane sit-in? This administration's many lies and obvious Islamophilia.
Post a Comment