Sunday, February 24, 2008

Mosques. Command Centres For War?

Surprise, surprise? It seems that 75% of the mosques in the US are hotbeds of anti-Western extremism. No doubt the same applies to mosques in the UK and Europe too. The form of extremism is such that it would be extremely foolish to allow them to exist. Seems to me that they ought to be redesigned in the horizontal format as an artistic collection of disconnected brick and concrete. Here's an extract:

Sermons that preach women are inferior to men and can be beaten for disobedience; that non-Muslims, particularly Jews, are infidels and inferior to Muslims; that jihad or support of jihad is not only a Muslim's duty but the noblest way, and suicide bombers and other so-called "martyrs" are worthy of the highest praise; and that an Islamic caliphate should one day encompass the U.S.

Though not all mosques in America are radicalized, many have tended to serve as safe havens and meeting points for Islamic terrorist groups. Experts say there are at least 40 episodes of extremists and terrorists being connected to mosques in the past decade alone.

Some of the 9/11 hijackers, in fact, received aid and counsel from one of the largest mosques in the Washington, D.C., area. Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center is one of the mosques indentified by undercover investigators as a hive of terrorist activity and other extremism.

It was founded and is currently run by leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood. Imams there preach what is called "jihad qital," which means physical jihad, and incite violence and hatred against the U.S.

Dar al-Hijrah's ultimate goal, investigators say, is to turn the U.S. into an Islamic state governed by sharia law.

I then found a long, and hard to read article from Summer Patriot, Winter Soldier which is ostensibly about the history and architecture of mosques. I have extracted some of the relevant paragraphs. They serve to remind us what Mosques ARE REALLY about:

. . . in short and as a matter of fact, the mosque has always been a fulcrum of conquest, as the mosque serves the role of military and political conquest, religious indoctrination and education, and political and religious administration of conquered areas and populations.

It has done so by the artifice of an advanced outpost of trade and economic relations if you must deal in current parlance; it has done so by the direct adjunct of military conquest; and it does so now as the adjunct and fulcrum of demographic conquest in western europe, and as the operational base for worldwide terror and the jihad wherever the mosque is found.

No distinction can be drawn between Islam, muslims, mosques, madrasa’s and any of the arms and accoutrements of Islam conquest in the 1400 years of Islam, and any distinction that would view the presence of a mosque in an american neighborhood as an innocent event is drawn by apologists, deceivers, or the very seriously delusional.

. . . Islam has been spread by the point of the sword, e.g., by conquest from the time of the beginning of the religion, nor for the fact that it is being spread by conquest now. why should there be? it is now as it was then, and that is the simple truth of the matter

. . . I am going to wrap this post up, as it is getting late and the post is far too long. this will be the last installment or post relative to the notion that mosques are forts. if you are not convinced at this point, nothing additional will convince you on this point.

. . . we need to start gathering intelligence on american mosques, to gain some appreciation of just how they have sought to establish these links, and with whom. and, we need to understand just how seemingly unrelated activities and organizations are linked up, and how centralized their planning is, and just how well they have their agenda’s mapped out.

. . . the examples of long range planning by the Muslim Brotherhood, their goals and agendas, and how they have implemented the same via a worldwide terrorist network, coordinated with a demographic attack on Europe, does not suggest that Islamic and arab interests in this country have been satisfied to sit around and do nothing.

. . . and it is, plain and simple, wrapped up in the communications network of the mosque. It has always been so, and there is absolutely no reason to believe that it should be otherwise in this country. the mosques are up and running and we know their agenda, because it has been the agenda of all mosques ever built: it is to expand islam.

There you have it. Get redesigning in the horizontal mode, but don't vote in Obama because he won't support such a notion.

(cross posted with CommonSense)

10 comments:

Michael Travis said...

Blimey! This cannot be true! A 5th column in Falls Church VA????? Why that's right in the DC area....and our [deaf, dumb, dumber, and blind] government!

Wow! Yerushalmi sure has a scoop this time!!!!!

Always On Watch said...

Ray,
A superior posting!

Back in college, I did a term paper on the Muslim influence on the architecture of Spain. Mosques are indeed as stated in the second of the above excerpts you provided: mosques are forts and the role of military and political conquest, religious indoctrination and education, and political and religious administration of conquered areas and populations.

In 14 centuries, Islam is what it is and continues to spread via military and cultural conquest.

BTW, I've interviewed Yerulshalmi and read some of the findings of Mapping Shari'ah. That interview was some months back; the group, no doubt, has even more findings now.

Also, more than one Wahhabist tied to the Falls Church mosque has been jailed for ties to terrorism. That particular mosque is also in the immediate vicinity of the convicted "paintball jihadists."

Michael Travis said...

A am absolutely certain that Always know more about Falls Church and the Jihadis in our midst than does David. No offence intended, but Yerushalmi's interest in the spread of Islam in the USA is rather new and is best measured in months and weeks. He has an awful lot to learn.

Always On Watch said...

Michael,
Well, I was in the Falls Church mosque before 9/11, to do some prep work for teaching World Literature.

I recall a lot of what I saw there but did not notice jihadi material, likely not on display as the day was open house. The panel discussion about jihad was, um, something else and quite heated. Looking back, I'm sure that the one Muslim who so vehemently insisted that jihad means holy war was of the jihadist persuasion.

Northern Virginiastan and I have compiled quite a bit of info over the past few years. You might find the archives there quite informative; I did inform Dave Gaubatz of those archives some time back.

I do happen to know a lot about the Islamic Saudi Academy, particularly the campus on Popes Head Road. The site was previously a Christian school; now it looks like a fortress. I told Dave Gaubatz about that change, too.

Maybe some of the info I gave Gaubatz made its way to Yerulshalmi.

In any case, an in-depth investigation of the Falls Cnurch mosque and ISA is long overdue.

Always On Watch said...

Michael,
Oh, and thanks for the compliment.

Always On Watch said...

Years ago, Paul Sperry sounded the alarm about the Islamist infiltration of the D.C. Metro area. HERE is the section on the Wahhabi Corridor, and that's just one example from Sperry's materials of several years ago.

Michael Travis said...

Always....My little group has found your research and information invaluable in the preparation for our own little holidays in Virginia and the DC area. Dr. Paul Williams has acknowledged your contributions on the radio and on Fox-News.....your work is very important.

Gaubatz's ridiculous essays on the Dar Al Hijrah mosque gave plenty of ammo to the enemy, alerted them to possible incursions, and served to prove that he had not actually set foot in the place.

Peace

Anonymous said...

I foresee some difficulties with the mapping project: At the rate they are going, it will take years to map the thousands of extant mosques. While they are at it, new ones sprout up and the extant ones that have been checked and found to be OK at the time may turn fundamentalist later on.

With regard to Paul Sperry, I wish he had continued with his investigation after the publication of his book.

Always On Watch said...

As of this morning, on Friday, February 29, David Yerulshalmi is scheduled to be interviewed on the Blog Talk Radio show which I cohost. Info about the show is up at the show's web site.

Always On Watch said...

Michael,
Always....My little group has found your research and information invaluable in the preparation for our own little holidays in Virginia and the DC area. Dr. Paul Williams has acknowledged your contributions on the radio and on Fox-News.....your work is very important.

You're kidding! I had no idea!