Saturday, September 30, 2006

Muslim Cab Driver Refuses To Pick Up Blind Woman

A Muslim cab driver refuses to pick up a blind woman and her guide dogs. Why? Because Muslims think dogs are filthy animals:


A Muslim minicab driver refused to take a blind woman with her guide dog because of religious objections. In Islam, dogs are regarded as being “unclean” in the same way that pigs are. But his refusal has led to his being convicted under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.

Bernie Reddington, 37, was furious when London taxi driver Basir Miah refused to take her and her guide dog Orla in his private hire vehicle. Mrs Reddington, from Norwich, along with her son Christopher, 13, who is also blind, attended a hospital appointment at Great Ormond Street children’s hospital in London last November.

Taxi driver Basir Miah arrived in his cab to collect Mrs Reddington to take her to Liverpool Street station, but when he saw her guide dog, he said: “No dogs”. After ignoring Mrs Reddington’s insistence that his refusal to take the dog was illegal, Miah left the group with a hospital receptionist. This week, at London’s Horseferry Road Magistrates’ Court, he admitted refusing to carry out a booking made by a disabled person on the grounds that the disabled person was accompanied by her assistance dog. He was fined £150 and agreed to pay £250 compensation.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's strange that Death-cultists have such a low opinion of dogs, and yet they'll still have sex with them (before or after they kill them?) when they get the chance.

http://jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/010760.php

Give a dog a bone (so to speak) Allah f***ing Akhbar!!!

Anonymous said...

What an excellent topic for discussion with those "nice, polite, moderate Muslim folks down the block who are just like you and me". Let's get a dialogue going about what they really think of us for picking up after our pooches. That should provide a cultural wake-up call for the neighbors. Maybe "Bridges TV" (see post above) could do a few public service spots on the subject... promote greater understanding, ya know.

Prodicus said...

This wouldn't even be news in Malmo. Standard procedure.

Pastorius said...

Hi Tasbeeh,
You sound like a decent guy. Thanks for you comment.

I believe there are probably many Muslims who feel the same way as you. However, two sources on Non-Muslims being najis are Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Ayatollah al-Sistani.

As I understand it, this idea that Infidels are najis is a Shiite idea. Maybe you are Sunni?

Anonymous said...

Yes, Pastorius, she is Sunni. She answers it at the end of this post:
http://confessionsofasorethumb.blogspot.com/2006/09/muslims-and-america.html

Regards.

Pastorius said...

Thanks, Blueslord.

I hope she comes back and sees what I wrote. I hate thinking that she thinks we just make this shit up.

sharpshooter said...

In the N.American white Christian culture and the exported white culture abroad it's OK to hunt down and shoot any living thing in the wilderness moose, mountain lions, humans in the case of the natives dear, turtles, wolves, ducks. gees, wolverines, baggers, buffalo seals which are skinned alive by a disgusting white man who never heard of the word mercy.Christians believe Earth and everything in it was created for the sake of man, and man can exploit anything in it living or otherwise. Such brutality justified in your book, why don't write about the ongoing slaughter of the koalas in Australia by white Christians and the extinction of many species in Australia such as the Thilasine and koalas in some areas on the hands of the same criminals. Log in to this link to white christian crimes against animals: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3112460106993701342&q=seal+being+skinned+alive&total=4&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
justifying 12 days old baby seals for their fur coat skinning them alive with complete disregard to their pain and suffering:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-646299

Anonymous said...

Why do Muslim dislike dogs?
Let's understand Islam and it's creator.
Prophet Muhammed was a very horny fellow. He was one of those people if he lived in this day and age will be a convicted child rapist rather than a prohet. During the live and times of Muhammed there was no law requiring a man to keep his penis in his pants and having sex with anything that had a hole. So explains the fact that he raped a 9 year old Aisah. Of course he and Muslims claim he married her. But honestly do you think any real prohpet will even consider marrying a six year girl and start having sex with her by the time she is nine. Maybe a phedophile prophet.
So in general to protect young girls and women from the horny, violent Muhammed, the the girls were forced to cover themselves up from head to foot. Not on modest grounds but as a protective measure. Some where along the way this became a tradition.
When the women starting covering themselves up Muhammed had difficulty getting young girls, so he turned to the dog. However, after poking the dogs behind a few times he found it unpleasurable. Being unhappy with the dog he made a decree dogs are dirty and unislamic.

Anonymous said...

Islam is a filthy religion. Just look at how it takes what in many (though by no means all) cases is a normal human, and turns him into a beast.

ytba